Anonymous wrote:Bump.
Anonymous wrote:I think wild behind the scenes
Anonymous wrote:I think to myself, "why did 18:31 resurrect this idiotic thread?"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think that it's more likely that the kid contributes to my impression of the school than that the school contributes to my impression of the kid. And "Big 3" isn't a relevant category in that regard. I don't expect Sidwell, NCS/StA, GDS kids to be similar in ways that would differentiate them from kids who go to WIS, Deal, Latin, Burke, WES, etc.
My personal observation is that, for whatever reason, the kids from the schools perceived to be more "conservative" - NCS/STA/St. Patricks/NPS - tend to be more polite, polished, and better groomed, although a bit cookie-cutter.
We have visited 2 of these schools. Observation seems spot-on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think that it's more likely that the kid contributes to my impression of the school than that the school contributes to my impression of the kid. And "Big 3" isn't a relevant category in that regard. I don't expect Sidwell, NCS/StA, GDS kids to be similar in ways that would differentiate them from kids who go to WIS, Deal, Latin, Burke, WES, etc.
My personal observation is that, for whatever reason, the kids from the schools perceived to be more "conservative" - NCS/STA/St. Patricks/NPS - tend to be more polite, polished, and better groomed, although a bit cookie-cutter.
Anonymous wrote:I think that it's more likely that the kid contributes to my impression of the school than that the school contributes to my impression of the kid. And "Big 3" isn't a relevant category in that regard. I don't expect Sidwell, NCS/StA, GDS kids to be similar in ways that would differentiate them from kids who go to WIS, Deal, Latin, Burke, WES, etc.