Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard should live Within its means. Old fashioned word not familiar in Cambridge budget. Endowment is a Pool of thousands of restrictred funds but that frees up money for other areas that are not fully funded.
Science research grants are not charity. Grant money is exchanged for results.
But Harvard can free up cash to do propaganda and ideology stuff because the government pays for its research component. How is that hard to understand?
You need to read more than right wing propaganda.
And you need to quit thinking Harvard is the be all. It's not.
That's right. You really need to stop fixating on Harvard, because the administration's attack on science is hitting all over, including both public and private universities in the midwest, the south, etc.
This. Not sure why that poster has missed this crucial point. It’s not just about about Harvard. It’s about all science research that is being drastically cut. Not moved to other institutions.
I think it’s because scientists are by nature pretty introverted and not used to the type of PR needed to make Americans aware of what’s going on. Comms is not the strong point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$57 billion says it all and don’t pay property taxes. Harvard’s got a great gig.
How does destroying Harvard help anyone? And the funding is cut across the board not just from Harvard.
Asking a federal funded institution to stay apolitical and non-racist is NOT destroying them!!!
It is not a federally funded institution. institutions compete for research grants and are awarded research grants based on the science, not based on some political ideology you're trying to impose. Or at least that's the way it should be. When you remove that, it is destructive.
The research itself may not be political, but they use the freed up cash to political stuff and become entitled to it. So now they need to lose the entitlement and fund their own research.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Exactly uplift our own citizens. How many American students get grants from China and India to study in their universities in science stem field. Probably could fit in a VW SUV because they won’t allow US cars into their closed markets. Enough!
I know for a fact China offers scholarships to Americans and other foreign nationals to study in their top universities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$57 billion endowment, enough.
^^^ doesn't know how endowments work
LOL just sit on the endowment and get federal money.
I am so freaking tired of this. Let’s say you were a millionaire (like Sam Walton). And I wanted to get some groceries from you because I wanted to feed my family. Should you just give me my groceries because I am so wealthy? Or do you think it’s reasonable for me to say, come to my store and buy what you want. This is how research works too. We (American people) decide research is important and a public good. We look for the best places to get it. The answer is universities (Harvard and Georgia Tech). We pay for it. We don’t get to say “use your own money to pay for this thing that I want”.
Great. Send more money to Ga Tech.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$57 billion says it all and don’t pay property taxes. Harvard’s got a great gig.
How does destroying Harvard help anyone? And the funding is cut across the board not just from Harvard.
Asking a federal funded institution to stay apolitical and non-racist is NOT destroying them!!!
It is not a federally funded institution. institutions compete for research grants and are awarded research grants based on the science, not based on some political ideology you're trying to impose. Or at least that's the way it should be. When you remove that, it is destructive.
When the federal government is cutting just a little bit of fat and it is sending your institution into a financial crisis, maybe you relied too much on the federal government teat...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard should live Within its means. Old fashioned word not familiar in Cambridge budget. Endowment is a Pool of thousands of restrictred funds but that frees up money for other areas that are not fully funded.
Science research grants are not charity. Grant money is exchanged for results.
But Harvard can free up cash to do propaganda and ideology stuff because the government pays for its research component. How is that hard to understand?
You need to read more than right wing propaganda.
And you need to quit thinking Harvard is the be all. It's not.
That's right. You really need to stop fixating on Harvard, because the administration's attack on science is hitting all over, including both public and private universities in the midwest, the south, etc.
This. Not sure why that poster has missed this crucial point. It’s not just about about Harvard. It’s about all science research that is being drastically cut. Not moved to other institutions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard should live Within its means. Old fashioned word not familiar in Cambridge budget. Endowment is a Pool of thousands of restrictred funds but that frees up money for other areas that are not fully funded.
Science research grants are not charity. Grant money is exchanged for results.
But Harvard can free up cash to do propaganda and ideology stuff because the government pays for its research component. How is that hard to understand?
You need to read more than right wing propaganda.
And you need to quit thinking Harvard is the be all. It's not.
That's right. You really need to stop fixating on Harvard, because the administration's attack on science is hitting all over, including both public and private universities in the midwest, the south, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$57 billion says it all and don’t pay property taxes. Harvard’s got a great gig.
How does destroying Harvard help anyone? And the funding is cut across the board not just from Harvard.
Asking a federal funded institution to stay apolitical and non-racist is NOT destroying them!!!
It is not a federally funded institution. institutions compete for research grants and are awarded research grants based on the science, not based on some political ideology you're trying to impose. Or at least that's the way it should be. When you remove that, it is destructive.
When the federal government is cutting just a little bit of fat and it is sending your institution into a financial crisis, maybe you relied too much on the federal government teat...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$57 billion says it all and don’t pay property taxes. Harvard’s got a great gig.
How does destroying Harvard help anyone? And the funding is cut across the board not just from Harvard.
Asking a federal funded institution to stay apolitical and non-racist is NOT destroying them!!!
It is not a federally funded institution. institutions compete for research grants and are awarded research grants based on the science, not based on some political ideology you're trying to impose. Or at least that's the way it should be. When you remove that, it is destructive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard should live Within its means. Old fashioned word not familiar in Cambridge budget. Endowment is a Pool of thousands of restrictred funds but that frees up money for other areas that are not fully funded.
Science research grants are not charity. Grant money is exchanged for results.
But Harvard can free up cash to do propaganda and ideology stuff because the government pays for its research component. How is that hard to understand?
You need to read more than right wing propaganda.
And you need to quit thinking Harvard is the be all. It's not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:stay apolitical and non-racist
Assuming facts not in evidence.
Anonymous wrote:stay apolitical and non-racist
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$57 billion says it all and don’t pay property taxes. Harvard’s got a great gig.
How does destroying Harvard help anyone? And the funding is cut across the board not just from Harvard.
Asking a federal funded institution to stay apolitical and non-racist is NOT destroying them!!!
It is not a federally funded institution. institutions compete for research grants and are awarded research grants based on the science, not based on some political ideology you're trying to impose. Or at least that's the way it should be. When you remove that, it is destructive.
The research itself may not be political, but they use the freed up cash to political stuff and become entitled to it. So now they need to lose the entitlement and fund their own research.
It's not their own research. It belongs to the funders. And lots of other institutions do taxpayer-funded research.
The decision was made decades ago to have various academic institutions perform research for the government, rather than building more and more National labs.
As many have mentioned, NSF, NIH, DOD, National labs etc keep tight reins on the research. There is collaboration with the National labs but this is a way to expand and multiply scientific research.
Is that what you would prefer? More government labs? Or just let our leading position go in scientific research?
Science is an engine not an anchor and if we don’t feed it with PhD candidates it will slowly grind to a halt.
What if your contractor/employee has been plotting to go against your very own interest or promoting something you believe is a total BS? Cut the ties of course.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard should live Within its means. Old fashioned word not familiar in Cambridge budget. Endowment is a Pool of thousands of restrictred funds but that frees up money for other areas that are not fully funded.
Science research grants are not charity. Grant money is exchanged for results.
But Harvard can free up cash to do propaganda and ideology stuff because the government pays for its research component. How is that hard to understand?
You need to read more than right wing propaganda.