Anonymous wrote:These pro-public school parents will do anything to justify their poor decisions to expose their kids to the cut-throat (literally!!) environment of public schools. Just admit you were too selfish to sacrifice or make any effort to find a better place for your kid. I hope they are ok.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids are in college now and the kids who left for private didn’t have any better college outcomes than the kids who stayed. Bright kids are going to thrive anywhere.
You need to read the other millions of threads on this. Most of us don't send our kids to private for college outcomes. If that's your goal stay public! We send our kids private for whole child development, leadership development, social development etc. in addition to academic development - which is still better at private because of smaller more engaging classes.
I sent one of my kids for a year at TJ and on all those fronts mentioned above it was a disaster - he went back to his private school and my younger 3 never attended public.
Good for you, but nobody cares. The point of this thread was ROI for people who can’t easily afford private school
DP
You must be thick. The point of that post is directly aligned with the topic. If college is your goal and you are middle class - stay public. The PP that this poster responded to (probably you) didn't understand why people would choose private school if college outcomes are the same - I think the post covers that. Clearly, your ISEE reading comprehension score would be too low for private school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids are in college now and the kids who left for private didn’t have any better college outcomes than the kids who stayed. Bright kids are going to thrive anywhere.
You need to read the other millions of threads on this. Most of us don't send our kids to private for college outcomes. If that's your goal stay public! We send our kids private for whole child development, leadership development, social development etc. in addition to academic development - which is still better at private because of smaller more engaging classes.
I sent one of my kids for a year at TJ and on all those fronts mentioned above it was a disaster - he went back to his private school and my younger 3 never attended public.
Good for you, but nobody cares. The point of this thread was ROI for people who can’t easily afford private school
Anonymous wrote:These pro private school posters are simply not middle class. They just aren’t. The only true middle class people paying for private school are doing it for religious reasons which tend to be cheaper anyway, plus you can see the financial sacrifices they are making in their homes, vacations etc.
This ain’t rocket science.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids are in college now and the kids who left for private didn’t have any better college outcomes than the kids who stayed. Bright kids are going to thrive anywhere.
It's not just about college, but I guess people can't quite grasp that concept. I prefer to have my kid happy, safe, and less stressed in her high school years vs. being in a violent environment where there might not be a place to sit in your classroom or lunchroom or a bathroom close by to use.
Obviously, a lot of public school parents don’t care about their kid’s daily environment and are instead focused on what college the kid ends up at.
Or they think being in such an environment builds their kid’s ‘resilience.’
Or it’s not as bad as you choose to believe to justify your choice. Confirmation bias.
Or it is bad and you're in denial. My parents didn't think it was that bad for me and I went to a wealthy public school. In middle school I got offered cocaine in the bathroom. I saw people having sex in the hallway. I saw a real gun that someone brought to school (it stayed in the kid's backpack) - and this was the early 90s before Columbine. I knew gang members- and even sang with one of them in our district choir - so we were kinda friends. Kids drank, smoked and did drugs. I was exposed to all of it and may parents didn't know, because I didn't say anything- it was my normal. Not a chance I'm sending my kid to the wealthy public schools I attended. I know there are no gang members or guns at my kid's schools. Sire there are sex and drugs - but not in the bathroom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids are in college now and the kids who left for private didn’t have any better college outcomes than the kids who stayed. Bright kids are going to thrive anywhere.
True, but life is about the journey not the destination. Everyone has the same destination- death.
Anonymous wrote:My kids are in college now and the kids who left for private didn’t have any better college outcomes than the kids who stayed. Bright kids are going to thrive anywhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids are in college now and the kids who left for private didn’t have any better college outcomes than the kids who stayed. Bright kids are going to thrive anywhere.
You need to read the other millions of threads on this. Most of us don't send our kids to private for college outcomes. If that's your goal stay public! We send our kids private for whole child development, leadership development, social development etc. in addition to academic development - which is still better at private because of smaller more engaging classes.
I sent one of my kids for a year at TJ and on all those fronts mentioned above it was a disaster - he went back to his private school and my younger 3 never attended public.
Good for you, but nobody cares. The point of this thread was ROI for people who can’t easily afford private school
DP
You must be thick. The point of that post is directly aligned with the topic. If college is your goal and you are middle class - stay public. The PP that this poster responded to (probably you) didn't understand why people would choose private school if college outcomes are the same - I think the post covers that. Clearly, your ISEE reading comprehension score would be too low for private school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids are in college now and the kids who left for private didn’t have any better college outcomes than the kids who stayed. Bright kids are going to thrive anywhere.
It's not just about college, but I guess people can't quite grasp that concept. I prefer to have my kid happy, safe, and less stressed in her high school years vs. being in a violent environment where there might not be a place to sit in your classroom or lunchroom or a bathroom close by to use.
Obviously, a lot of public school parents don’t care about their kid’s daily environment and are instead focused on what college the kid ends up at.
Or they think being in such an environment builds their kid’s ‘resilience.’
Or it’s not as bad as you choose to believe to justify your choice. Confirmation bias.
Or it is bad and you're in denial. My parents didn't think it was that bad for me and I went to a wealthy public school. In middle school I got offered cocaine in the bathroom. I saw people having sex in the hallway. I saw a real gun that someone brought to school (it stayed in the kid's backpack) - and this was the early 90s before Columbine. I knew gang members- and even sang with one of them in our district choir - so we were kinda friends. Kids drank, smoked and did drugs. I was exposed to all of it and may parents didn't know, because I didn't say anything- it was my normal. Not a chance I'm sending my kid to the wealthy public schools I attended. I know there are no gang members or guns at my kid's schools. Sire there are sex and drugs - but not in the bathroom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids are in college now and the kids who left for private didn’t have any better college outcomes than the kids who stayed. Bright kids are going to thrive anywhere.
You need to read the other millions of threads on this. Most of us don't send our kids to private for college outcomes. If that's your goal stay public! We send our kids private for whole child development, leadership development, social development etc. in addition to academic development - which is still better at private because of smaller more engaging classes.
I sent one of my kids for a year at TJ and on all those fronts mentioned above it was a disaster - he went back to his private school and my younger 3 never attended public.
Good for you, but nobody cares. The point of this thread was ROI for people who can’t easily afford private school
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids are in college now and the kids who left for private didn’t have any better college outcomes than the kids who stayed. Bright kids are going to thrive anywhere.
It's not just about college, but I guess people can't quite grasp that concept. I prefer to have my kid happy, safe, and less stressed in her high school years vs. being in a violent environment where there might not be a place to sit in your classroom or lunchroom or a bathroom close by to use.
Obviously, a lot of public school parents don’t care about their kid’s daily environment and are instead focused on what college the kid ends up at.
Or they think being in such an environment builds their kid’s ‘resilience.’
Or it’s not as bad as you choose to believe to justify your choice. Confirmation bias.
Or it is bad and you're in denial. My parents didn't think it was that bad for me and I went to a wealthy public school. In middle school I got offered cocaine in the bathroom. I saw people having sex in the hallway. I saw a real gun that someone brought to school (it stayed in the kid's backpack) - and this was the early 90s before Columbine. I knew gang members- and even sang with one of them in our district choir - so we were kinda friends. Kids drank, smoked and did drugs. I was exposed to all of it and may parents didn't know, because I didn't say anything- it was my normal. Not a chance I'm sending my kid to the wealthy public schools I attended. I know there are no gang members or guns at my kid's schools. Sire there are sex and drugs - but not in the bathroom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids are in college now and the kids who left for private didn’t have any better college outcomes than the kids who stayed. Bright kids are going to thrive anywhere.
It's not just about college, but I guess people can't quite grasp that concept. I prefer to have my kid happy, safe, and less stressed in her high school years vs. being in a violent environment where there might not be a place to sit in your classroom or lunchroom or a bathroom close by to use.
Obviously, a lot of public school parents don’t care about their kid’s daily environment and are instead focused on what college the kid ends up at.
Or they think being in such an environment builds their kid’s ‘resilience.’
Or it’s not as bad as you choose to believe to justify your choice. Confirmation bias.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids are in college now and the kids who left for private didn’t have any better college outcomes than the kids who stayed. Bright kids are going to thrive anywhere.
You need to read the other millions of threads on this. Most of us don't send our kids to private for college outcomes. If that's your goal stay public! We send our kids private for whole child development, leadership development, social development etc. in addition to academic development - which is still better at private because of smaller more engaging classes.
I sent one of my kids for a year at TJ and on all those fronts mentioned above it was a disaster - he went back to his private school and my younger 3 never attended public.