Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This DOJ hires someone indicted for crimes on January 6th (he was egging on rioters to kill police officers), transfers Ghislaine Maxwell to a minimum security Club Fed, then grants her work release privileges, but brags about charging this guy with a felony? What a bunch of amoral partisan hacks.

These people have to be assuming that they will never cede power. There is no other way to explain their behavior. Are they really that confident that Trump will live long enough to pardon them all, each and every one?

Anonymous wrote:This DOJ hires someone indicted for crimes on January 6th (he was egging on rioters to kill police officers), transfers Ghislaine Maxwell to a minimum security Club Fed, then grants her work release privileges, but brags about charging this guy with a felony? What a bunch of amoral partisan hacks.

Anonymous wrote:They will not get a felony jury conviction in DC, because that would require ALL not just some of the jurors to vote guilty.

Anonymous wrote:The corner guys were laughing at him. Only some drunk lady in Bethesda is crowing about his heroic actions. Dude is going to end up in federal prison and just blew up his life. Other low info posters were claiming he had backers for a law office despite him not being a lawyer. Maybe dial back on the day drinking and use facts not made up fantasies. Which one of you will encourage your son or daughter to do the same? Go out in DC and do something performative and pointless to ruin their lives?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He just threw away a good federal job with good retirement and benefits.

Hope it was worth it for his 15 seconds of fame in resist online circles.

Could be disbarred, too.

Guys on the corner filming were egging him on. Performing for attention from rough trade is going to be very costly. They were laughing at him but he was oblivious. He even glanced at them while running away.

https://x.com/MichaelSCollura/status/1955815756815614332

Remember the DC principal who ordered up rough trade from a phone line and was murdered in his home? Some people get to late 30s and lack all common sense.

It’s funny to watch but he may got to prison and be stripped of his law license. Smdh.

This principal.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/brian-betts-update-four-suspects-arrested-in-killing-of-dc-principal/

Dunn kept looking to the black guys on the corner for attention in the longer video. They were mocking him. Dude just blew up his life and career. At 37 should not be such a dumbass. All that money for tuition, studying for the bar, being one of the few who land a DOJ job, …

And the “I don’t want you in MY CITY!!!” lol. So MPC narc in energy. Didn’t get a hook up on U but better luck in fed prison, I guess. Maybe he was drunk?

This forum has been taken over by idiots. The DC Bar is not going to disbar Mr Dunn for this single act of civil disobedience. Are any of you actually attorneys? Do any of you understand how the DC Bar operates? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!

You may in fact be taking pills bc your thinking is off. Or it is YOU who is not barred in DC.

————-

If an attorney is convicted of a felony, the D.C. Bar's Office of Disciplinary Counsel initiates a disciplinary proceeding.
Moral Turpitude:
A key factor in determining the severity of the sanction is whether the felony conviction involves "moral turpitude".
Disbarment:
If the conviction is deemed to involve moral turpitude, the Court of Appeals may disbar the attorney, meaning they lose their license to practice law.
Suspension:
The court may also suspend the attorney's license for a fixed period of time.
Other Sanctions:
Less severe sanctions include censure, reprimand, or informal admonition.

The likelihood that Mr Dunn's conduct, assuming it results in a federal felony conviction, will be determined to have involved "moral turpitude" is nil. So, no, he will not be disbarred. His license will be suspended automatially upon conviction, but in the end he will not be disbarred.

You're good at google. Google "moral turpitude."

He isn’t a lawyer, the guy with that name at DOJ is much older. So nattering on about moral turpitude is completely pointless. Facts matter.

Yea I’ve since learned we’ve been talking about the wrong guy. But here is the thing – I’m right that if he was a lawyer, he wouldn’t be disbarred. So yea, facts matter. Dick.

I was completely wrong but just can’t let it go, lol. Ok PP.

Dude has really blown up his life. Sad at his age. Bartender at The Bunker should have cut him off.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He just threw away a good federal job with good retirement and benefits.

Hope it was worth it for his 15 seconds of fame in resist online circles.

Could be disbarred, too.

Guys on the corner filming were egging him on. Performing for attention from rough trade is going to be very costly. They were laughing at him but he was oblivious. He even glanced at them while running away.

https://x.com/MichaelSCollura/status/1955815756815614332

Remember the DC principal who ordered up rough trade from a phone line and was murdered in his home? Some people get to late 30s and lack all common sense.

It’s funny to watch but he may got to prison and be stripped of his law license. Smdh.

This principal.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/brian-betts-update-four-suspects-arrested-in-killing-of-dc-principal/

Dunn kept looking to the black guys on the corner for attention in the longer video. They were mocking him. Dude just blew up his life and career. At 37 should not be such a dumbass. All that money for tuition, studying for the bar, being one of the few who land a DOJ job, …

And the “I don’t want you in MY CITY!!!” lol. So MPC narc in energy. Didn’t get a hook up on U but better luck in fed prison, I guess. Maybe he was drunk?

This forum has been taken over by idiots. The DC Bar is not going to disbar Mr Dunn for this single act of civil disobedience. Are any of you actually attorneys? Do any of you understand how the DC Bar operates? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!

You may in fact be taking pills bc your thinking is off. Or it is YOU who is not barred in DC.

————-

If an attorney is convicted of a felony, the D.C. Bar's Office of Disciplinary Counsel initiates a disciplinary proceeding.
Moral Turpitude:
A key factor in determining the severity of the sanction is whether the felony conviction involves "moral turpitude".
Disbarment:
If the conviction is deemed to involve moral turpitude, the Court of Appeals may disbar the attorney, meaning they lose their license to practice law.
Suspension:
The court may also suspend the attorney's license for a fixed period of time.
Other Sanctions:
Less severe sanctions include censure, reprimand, or informal admonition.

The likelihood that Mr Dunn's conduct, assuming it results in a federal felony conviction, will be determined to have involved "moral turpitude" is nil. So, no, he will not be disbarred. His license will be suspended automatially upon conviction, but in the end he will not be disbarred.

You're good at google. Google "moral turpitude."

He isn’t a lawyer, the guy with that name at DOJ is much older. So nattering on about moral turpitude is completely pointless. Facts matter.

Yea I’ve since learned we’ve been talking about the wrong guy. But here is the thing – I’m right that if he was a lawyer, he wouldn’t be disbarred. So yea, facts matter. Dick.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems like your typical privileged liberal, as evidenced by his adolescent mind and seeming inability to believe that much of anything would happen if he went too far. Like a teenager raging against mom and dad and them expecting to borrow the car.

Or maybe he just couldn't stand it any longer, working at DOJ which is being turned into DO-not-J and seeing the army take over DC ...?

Just because he was wearing pink shorts, doesn't' mean he was wrong.