Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/117923/documents/HHRG-119-JU10-20250225-SD001.pdf

They were ‘selling’ babies as American citizens to sponsor their donor parents. They need to close this loophole asap. Otherwise trump is right about birthright citizenship (and I really don’t want him to be.)

Imagine that.

Strangely enough, the biden administration did nothing whatsoever to stop this . . .

They did, however, open the flood gates for child rape, as if there wasn’t already enough evil.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/117923/documents/HHRG-119-JU10-20250225-SD001.pdf

They were ‘selling’ babies as American citizens to sponsor their donor parents. They need to close this loophole asap. Otherwise trump is right about birthright citizenship (and I really don’t want him to be.)

A child can’t sponsor a parent until they are either 18 or 21. That’s a helluva long game.

Maybe that’s why the house where they were found was set up like a hotel/school? Wasn’t one of the kids found there older, like 13? They pay for the babies via surrogacy > educate them in this weird orphanage until 18-21 > essentially sell them to a rich Chinese couple when they hit the age of majority and force them to bring the Chinese “parents” to the US > young adult born to surrogacy is now essentially an indentured servant to these Chinese strangers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/117923/documents/HHRG-119-JU10-20250225-SD001.pdf

They were ‘selling’ babies as American citizens to sponsor their donor parents. They need to close this loophole asap. Otherwise trump is right about birthright citizenship (and I really don’t want him to be.)

Imagine that.

Strangely enough, the biden administration did nothing whatsoever to stop this . . .

Anonymous wrote:https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/117923/documents/HHRG-119-JU10-20250225-SD001.pdf

They were ‘selling’ babies as American citizens to sponsor their donor parents. They need to close this loophole asap. Otherwise trump is right about birthright citizenship (and I really don’t want him to be.)

Imagine that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This “couple” claimed they just wanted a big family.

That is obviously a lie.

They planned to traffic these children for profit.

This sounds more reasonable. Sell them via adoption.

Surrogates are paid $50k or more for their services, per baby.

Whatever this “couple” was planning, they would have to make in excess of $50k to make a profit.

Also: who funded their house and gave them all the money?

Were there any prior surrogate babies they bought and already disposed of ?

How do you know the babies have their DNA? I wouldn’t be surprised if they are actual babies are from different couples.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This sounds more like a trafficking issue than a surrogacy issue.

But our lax surrogacy laws made it possible.

I believe surrogacy should void against public policy with narrow exceptions, like a family member carrying for a couple. Yes, I realize that leaves some people out of parenthood, but IMO the risk for exploitation or women and children outweighs that interest.

Agreed. No one is entitled to a child.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/117923/documents/HHRG-119-JU10-20250225-SD001.pdf

They were ‘selling’ babies as American citizens to sponsor their donor parents. They need to close this loophole asap. Otherwise trump is right about birthright citizenship (and I really don’t want him to be.)

A child can’t sponsor a parent until they are either 18 or 21. That’s a helluva long game.

Harvesting tween/teen organs back in China would be quicker and more profitable.

Or just sell them into sex-slavery to someone in one of the rich Gulf states.

Anonymous wrote:https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/117923/documents/HHRG-119-JU10-20250225-SD001.pdf

They were ‘selling’ babies as American citizens to sponsor their donor parents. They need to close this loophole asap. Otherwise trump is right about birthright citizenship (and I really don’t want him to be.)

A child can’t sponsor a parent until they are either 18 or 21. That’s a helluva long game.

https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/117923/documents/HHRG-119-JU10-20250225-SD001.pdf

They were ‘selling’ babies as American citizens to sponsor their donor parents. They need to close this loophole asap. Otherwise trump is right about birthright citizenship (and I really don’t want him to be.)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This “couple” claimed they just wanted a big family.

That is obviously a lie.

They planned to traffic these children for profit.

This sounds more reasonable. Sell them via adoption.

Surrogates are paid $50k or more for their services, per baby.

Whatever this “couple” was planning, they would have to make in excess of $50k to make a profit.

Also: who funded their house and gave them all the money?

Were there any prior surrogate babies they bought and already disposed of ?

Anonymous wrote:This “couple” claimed they just wanted a big family.

That is obviously a lie.

They planned to traffic these children for profit.

This sounds more reasonable. Sell them via adoption.

The most likely explanation is the children were being raised so that they could be surgically killed and their organs harvested and sold on the illicit market.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This “couple” claimed they just wanted a big family.

That is obviously a lie.

They planned to traffic these children for profit.

Were the babies Chinese?

As minors, their identities are concealed.

Anonymous wrote:This “couple” claimed they just wanted a big family.

That is obviously a lie.

They planned to traffic these children for profit.

Were the babies Chinese?

This “couple” claimed they just wanted a big family.

That is obviously a lie.

They planned to traffic these children for profit.