Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On the boys side, it looks like ECNL is doing better than the MLSN clubs. Certainly for the DMV area teams.
But the question is, how is your DC doing?
Have they improved since the end of last season
Anonymous wrote:On the boys side, it looks like ECNL is doing better than the MLSN clubs. Certainly for the DMV area teams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On the boys side, it looks like ECNL is doing better than the MLSN clubs. Certainly for the DMV area teams.
What age group? Lots of jockeying for MLSNext teams from ECNL has been squads, so lots of new players at the start of each year.
You see, at MLSNext, they focus on development rather than giving “patches” and wins for mommy and daddy.
Haha. There is literally a whole thread directed to MLSN parents complaining that the lower MLSN tiers have the same “patch.” They are outraged that the MLSN2 teams are dropping the 2 and nobody will know they are not true MLSN1 because of the “patch.”
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1288493.page
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On the boys side, it looks like ECNL is doing better than the MLSN clubs. Certainly for the DMV area teams.
What age group? Lots of jockeying for MLSNext teams from ECNL has been squads, so lots of new players at the start of each year.
You see, at MLSNext, they focus on development rather than giving “patches” and wins for mommy and daddy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On the boys side, it looks like ECNL is doing better than the MLSN clubs. Certainly for the DMV area teams.
Not sure what you are looking at, but Arl and VDA have basically split evenly vs Tier 1 MLSN teams. VDA got dropped 6-1 vs SYC at u13. Union looks to be a doormat in just about every age group.
Anonymous wrote:On the boys side, it looks like ECNL is doing better than the MLSN clubs. Certainly for the DMV area teams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tier 1 teams
Northern Virginia Alliance (NVA)
McLean Youth Soccer (MYS)
Springfield/South County Youth Club (SYC)
The St. James (TSJFC)
These are not good teams. That is because you are not tier 1, tier 1 is academy, so stop trying to separate yourself from tier 2. You are closer to tier 2 than academy. 7 teams in N VA. None of them Academy. You are NCSL. Soon everyone will realize the MLSN hoax for what it is, a race to the bottom, except academy.
SYC just won the U13 championship at the MLSNext Cup this past June. McLean and St.James are Tier 2 MLSNext.
Do your homework before you look more stupid than you already are.
Anonymous wrote:QC Mutiny showing y’all what is UP!
Anonymous wrote:Tier 1 teams
Northern Virginia Alliance (NVA)
McLean Youth Soccer (MYS)
Springfield/South County Youth Club (SYC)
The St. James (TSJFC)
These are not good teams. That is because you are not tier 1, tier 1 is academy, so stop trying to separate yourself from tier 2. You are closer to tier 2 than academy. 7 teams in N VA. None of them Academy. You are NCSL. Soon everyone will realize the MLSN hoax for what it is, a race to the bottom, except academy.
Anonymous wrote:On the boys side, it looks like ECNL is doing better than the MLSN clubs. Certainly for the DMV area teams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:i see the same… which is interestingAnonymous wrote:On the boys side, it looks like ECNL is doing better than the MLSN clubs. Certainly for the DMV area teams.
Arlington U19 ECNL beating TSJ 1-0 isn’t the flex you think it is.
How about U15 Alexandria drawing a RL team.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:i see the same… which is interestingAnonymous wrote:On the boys side, it looks like ECNL is doing better than the MLSN clubs. Certainly for the DMV area teams.
Arlington U19 ECNL beating TSJ 1-0 isn’t the flex you think it is.
Anonymous wrote:i see the same… which is interestingAnonymous wrote:On the boys side, it looks like ECNL is doing better than the MLSN clubs. Certainly for the DMV area teams.
Anonymous wrote:i see the same… which is interestingAnonymous wrote:On the boys side, it looks like ECNL is doing better than the MLSN clubs. Certainly for the DMV area teams.
i see the same… which is interestingAnonymous wrote:On the boys side, it looks like ECNL is doing better than the MLSN clubs. Certainly for the DMV area teams.