Anonymous wrote:The bill caps law student loans at $50,000 a year. I feel having fewer lawyers is a public benefit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:… if they’re not billionaires? They honestly believe that the cuts to Medicaid will only kick out “illegals” and lazy people? That the new higher deficit won’t have a negative impact on the economy and everyday people? I’m really trying to understand how Rep voters believe this. Is it Fox News propaganda? Are they really that gullible?
I give no effs about lazy losers on Medicaid.
There are significant benefits to this bill for the not-rich average American. My DH is a LEO and the no tax on overtime will be huge in our house, we were doing the math on that last night. I expect a lot of middle class people who work an hourly wage will find this benefit substantial.
Deductions for social security is also a big winner.
I am a small business owner and the depreciation of 100% now for equipment is huge. So is the pass through deduction of 20%.
So no we aren’t gullible or stupid, we just know how to read.
The "you guys are fools!" were telling us a mere year ago that Biden was perfectly healthy and that any suggestion otherwise was a "right wing talking point." And any video evidence that he was unsteady on his feet was a "cheap fake." Then they told us that if President Trump were reelected, he would somehow rescind the rights of black people and they would be sent to camps. They said that once he got into office, he would declare martial law. They were urging people to get their passports ready to flee the country! They said our economy would crash and burn. And Biden and Hillary both said that if we elected Trump, it would be our last election ever. Now they want us to believe their vague and unspecified claims that we misunderstand the BBB situation and that actually, by giving us money they will be taking our money. And we, they assess, are the uneducated morons. Lol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:… if they’re not billionaires? They honestly believe that the cuts to Medicaid will only kick out “illegals” and lazy people? That the new higher deficit won’t have a negative impact on the economy and everyday people? I’m really trying to understand how Rep voters believe this. Is it Fox News propaganda? Are they really that gullible?
The BBB will absolutely benefit the middle class by making tax cuts permanent and eliminating taxes on overtime and tips. I would rather have my hard earned money in my pocket, than have goons like Jeffries or AOC decide where it is to be spent. My money will be spent for the benefit of my children. The goons spend money to stay in power.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SS number of recipients has had a surprising drop recently. Perhaps this is DOGE finding fraud, or perhaps something to do with COVID vaccines.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What higher deficit? They largely kept the same tax rates.
There would have been a higher debt no matter what budget passed, as we saw with all the CRs the last 15 years.
This time they managed to corral the conservatives whining about the deficit who refused to vote for any budget bill. Thus they didn't have to go to Democrats for votes and could pass a lower level of spending.
Those tax rates were set to expire because they could not be made permanent under reconciliation the first time around. When passed, Trump and Republicans assumed Trump would have two terms and the Dems would likely handle the fallout.
But now they have to handle it. And instead of doing that, they are making the tax cut permanent at a 3.3T cost of the deficit.
The deficit and debt will increase because these cuts were never meant to be permanent. They are not sustainable even with massive spending cuts. Republicans just proved that the level of spending cuts required to get the deficit under control are not viable politically. The only answer is tax increases, and instead of addressing the issue, they are kicking the can down the road and massively increasing the deficit and rate of increase to the debt.
No. The answer is to stop spending our money! It's not the government's money, it's not your money, etc. It's our money, and they can reduce the deficit by cutting programs that don't improve anything and arent working. All this foreign aid has bought us nothing but the hate of the nations we give it to. Covering medical bills of poor people has brought nothing but a growing "eat the rich" mentality. So no more. You want class warfare- or more accurately warfare between people who want to live and work honestly and those who don't-- you've got it now. We aren't duped. We know what we are doing.
You still don't get it, and you obviously DON'T know what you're doing, because they are going to be spending A LOT MORE of "your money."
Explain to me how, by me being able to keep an additional 66k for every million in income, I am losing money. Please. Be specific.
The bill adds trillions of dollars to the debt. By 2032 the national debt will be about $50 trillion because of this bill.
Taxpayers already pay a trillion interest a year on our debt. 1) your taxes will go to pay even more interest on the debt because this adds to that burden. Interest on the debt is going to increase more. 2) the bill makes the SS trust fund run out a year earlier in 2032. Do you think Congress is going to let a bunch of seniors SS check get cut when the trust fund runs out? Hell no. How do you pay for it? Increase taxes or run even more debt.
Removing more illegal immigrants, as this bill does, will lower a lot of costs and boost wages. It will also reduce spending in a lot of government programs.
Illegal immigrants are helping to prop up SS. They pay into but don’t collect from it. Federal law doesn’t allow illegal immigrants to get most federal benefits. Some states use their own state dollars to give Medicaid to them but those aren’t federal dollars Los
People below the 50% of income earners effectively dont pay taxes. So I find the claim that the people detasseling cornfields are sending in billions in tax revenue to be very dubious.
You’re wrong. Federal income tax, state and local income tax, property tax, vehicle taxes, sales tax — and that’s just what I thought of quickly. Lower incomes are actually hit harder by certain kinds of taxes — like sales taxes — because the sums that the taxes represent are a relatively higher percentage of their income.
Taxes are the price everyone pays to live in a civilized society. Even the poor should contribute as part of living and benefiting from these things.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SS number of recipients has had a surprising drop recently. Perhaps this is DOGE finding fraud, or perhaps something to do with COVID vaccines.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What higher deficit? They largely kept the same tax rates.
There would have been a higher debt no matter what budget passed, as we saw with all the CRs the last 15 years.
This time they managed to corral the conservatives whining about the deficit who refused to vote for any budget bill. Thus they didn't have to go to Democrats for votes and could pass a lower level of spending.
Those tax rates were set to expire because they could not be made permanent under reconciliation the first time around. When passed, Trump and Republicans assumed Trump would have two terms and the Dems would likely handle the fallout.
But now they have to handle it. And instead of doing that, they are making the tax cut permanent at a 3.3T cost of the deficit.
The deficit and debt will increase because these cuts were never meant to be permanent. They are not sustainable even with massive spending cuts. Republicans just proved that the level of spending cuts required to get the deficit under control are not viable politically. The only answer is tax increases, and instead of addressing the issue, they are kicking the can down the road and massively increasing the deficit and rate of increase to the debt.
No. The answer is to stop spending our money! It's not the government's money, it's not your money, etc. It's our money, and they can reduce the deficit by cutting programs that don't improve anything and arent working. All this foreign aid has bought us nothing but the hate of the nations we give it to. Covering medical bills of poor people has brought nothing but a growing "eat the rich" mentality. So no more. You want class warfare- or more accurately warfare between people who want to live and work honestly and those who don't-- you've got it now. We aren't duped. We know what we are doing.
You still don't get it, and you obviously DON'T know what you're doing, because they are going to be spending A LOT MORE of "your money."
Explain to me how, by me being able to keep an additional 66k for every million in income, I am losing money. Please. Be specific.
The bill adds trillions of dollars to the debt. By 2032 the national debt will be about $50 trillion because of this bill.
Taxpayers already pay a trillion interest a year on our debt. 1) your taxes will go to pay even more interest on the debt because this adds to that burden. Interest on the debt is going to increase more. 2) the bill makes the SS trust fund run out a year earlier in 2032. Do you think Congress is going to let a bunch of seniors SS check get cut when the trust fund runs out? Hell no. How do you pay for it? Increase taxes or run even more debt.
Removing more illegal immigrants, as this bill does, will lower a lot of costs and boost wages. It will also reduce spending in a lot of government programs.
Illegal immigrants are helping to prop up SS. They pay into but don’t collect from it. Federal law doesn’t allow illegal immigrants to get most federal benefits. Some states use their own state dollars to give Medicaid to them but those aren’t federal dollars Los
People below the 50% of income earners effectively dont pay taxes. So I find the claim that the people detasseling cornfields are sending in billions in tax revenue to be very dubious.
You’re wrong. Federal income tax, state and local income tax, property tax, vehicle taxes, sales tax — and that’s just what I thought of quickly. Lower incomes are actually hit harder by certain kinds of taxes — like sales taxes — because the sums that the taxes represent are a relatively higher percentage of their income.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, 100%.
My brother is a bartender and a Republican. He voted for Trump. He initially thought the no tax on tips or OT would start immediately and was dismayed to find out those don't start until he files taxes for 2025.
He literally thought this would be done at the restaurant level, not IRS level. Laughable. Even after I told him time and time again it wouldn't be instant money in his pocket, but instead come as a refund.
He feels lied to but is going to trust the process because Trump is such a smart businessman.
I roll my eyes because he'll never see any of that money. He owes back taxes for like 4 years at the federal level and 3 years at the state level. He also owes like $4k in back child support. I tried to tell him that he wouldn't see any refund but because he got refunds during the covid years, he thinks he'll get them again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SS number of recipients has had a surprising drop recently. Perhaps this is DOGE finding fraud, or perhaps something to do with COVID vaccines.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What higher deficit? They largely kept the same tax rates.
There would have been a higher debt no matter what budget passed, as we saw with all the CRs the last 15 years.
This time they managed to corral the conservatives whining about the deficit who refused to vote for any budget bill. Thus they didn't have to go to Democrats for votes and could pass a lower level of spending.
Those tax rates were set to expire because they could not be made permanent under reconciliation the first time around. When passed, Trump and Republicans assumed Trump would have two terms and the Dems would likely handle the fallout.
But now they have to handle it. And instead of doing that, they are making the tax cut permanent at a 3.3T cost of the deficit.
The deficit and debt will increase because these cuts were never meant to be permanent. They are not sustainable even with massive spending cuts. Republicans just proved that the level of spending cuts required to get the deficit under control are not viable politically. The only answer is tax increases, and instead of addressing the issue, they are kicking the can down the road and massively increasing the deficit and rate of increase to the debt.
No. The answer is to stop spending our money! It's not the government's money, it's not your money, etc. It's our money, and they can reduce the deficit by cutting programs that don't improve anything and arent working. All this foreign aid has bought us nothing but the hate of the nations we give it to. Covering medical bills of poor people has brought nothing but a growing "eat the rich" mentality. So no more. You want class warfare- or more accurately warfare between people who want to live and work honestly and those who don't-- you've got it now. We aren't duped. We know what we are doing.
You still don't get it, and you obviously DON'T know what you're doing, because they are going to be spending A LOT MORE of "your money."
Explain to me how, by me being able to keep an additional 66k for every million in income, I am losing money. Please. Be specific.
The bill adds trillions of dollars to the debt. By 2032 the national debt will be about $50 trillion because of this bill.
Taxpayers already pay a trillion interest a year on our debt. 1) your taxes will go to pay even more interest on the debt because this adds to that burden. Interest on the debt is going to increase more. 2) the bill makes the SS trust fund run out a year earlier in 2032. Do you think Congress is going to let a bunch of seniors SS check get cut when the trust fund runs out? Hell no. How do you pay for it? Increase taxes or run even more debt.
Removing more illegal immigrants, as this bill does, will lower a lot of costs and boost wages. It will also reduce spending in a lot of government programs.
Illegal immigrants are helping to prop up SS. They pay into but don’t collect from it. Federal law doesn’t allow illegal immigrants to get most federal benefits. Some states use their own state dollars to give Medicaid to them but those aren’t federal dollars Los
People below the 50% of income earners effectively dont pay taxes. So I find the claim that the people detasseling cornfields are sending in billions in tax revenue to be very dubious.
You’re wrong. Federal income tax, state and local income tax, property tax, vehicle taxes, sales tax — and that’s just what I thought of quickly. Lower incomes are actually hit harder by certain kinds of taxes — like sales taxes — because the sums that the taxes represent are a relatively higher percentage of their income.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is so evil and blatant to start the bill right after mid terms. People are so easily manipulated and duped. I’m scared for this country.
And republicans do this every time they pass a crappy bill. And voters fall for it over and over again.
Check out the "infrastructure" built with Build Back Better.
How much do you pay for health care vs pre-Obamacare?
Were you able to "keep your doctor?"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SS number of recipients has had a surprising drop recently. Perhaps this is DOGE finding fraud, or perhaps something to do with COVID vaccines.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What higher deficit? They largely kept the same tax rates.
There would have been a higher debt no matter what budget passed, as we saw with all the CRs the last 15 years.
This time they managed to corral the conservatives whining about the deficit who refused to vote for any budget bill. Thus they didn't have to go to Democrats for votes and could pass a lower level of spending.
Those tax rates were set to expire because they could not be made permanent under reconciliation the first time around. When passed, Trump and Republicans assumed Trump would have two terms and the Dems would likely handle the fallout.
But now they have to handle it. And instead of doing that, they are making the tax cut permanent at a 3.3T cost of the deficit.
The deficit and debt will increase because these cuts were never meant to be permanent. They are not sustainable even with massive spending cuts. Republicans just proved that the level of spending cuts required to get the deficit under control are not viable politically. The only answer is tax increases, and instead of addressing the issue, they are kicking the can down the road and massively increasing the deficit and rate of increase to the debt.
No. The answer is to stop spending our money! It's not the government's money, it's not your money, etc. It's our money, and they can reduce the deficit by cutting programs that don't improve anything and arent working. All this foreign aid has bought us nothing but the hate of the nations we give it to. Covering medical bills of poor people has brought nothing but a growing "eat the rich" mentality. So no more. You want class warfare- or more accurately warfare between people who want to live and work honestly and those who don't-- you've got it now. We aren't duped. We know what we are doing.
You still don't get it, and you obviously DON'T know what you're doing, because they are going to be spending A LOT MORE of "your money."
Explain to me how, by me being able to keep an additional 66k for every million in income, I am losing money. Please. Be specific.
The bill adds trillions of dollars to the debt. By 2032 the national debt will be about $50 trillion because of this bill.
Taxpayers already pay a trillion interest a year on our debt. 1) your taxes will go to pay even more interest on the debt because this adds to that burden. Interest on the debt is going to increase more. 2) the bill makes the SS trust fund run out a year earlier in 2032. Do you think Congress is going to let a bunch of seniors SS check get cut when the trust fund runs out? Hell no. How do you pay for it? Increase taxes or run even more debt.
Removing more illegal immigrants, as this bill does, will lower a lot of costs and boost wages. It will also reduce spending in a lot of government programs.
Illegal immigrants are helping to prop up SS. They pay into but don’t collect from it. Federal law doesn’t allow illegal immigrants to get most federal benefits. Some states use their own state dollars to give Medicaid to them but those aren’t federal dollars Los
People below the 50% of income earners effectively dont pay taxes. So I find the claim that the people detasseling cornfields are sending in billions in tax revenue to be very dubious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Short term the bill will give me tax cuts, which means I keep more of my paycheck. Also I don't understand the obsession on the left with billionaires getting tax cuts. They are just going to pass down higher taxes to consumers or move their businesses and jobs overseas and so the whole point of tax cuts for them is to keep business here flowing through the US economy.
With that I agree with Musk that increased national Debt is not good and we should've stayed the course of trying to cut spending, even if the tax cuts aren't as generous. This is a gamble that or may not pay off.
And finally im not at all convinced I would be any more pleased with a democrat sponsored bill if they were in power.
When money goes to the lower and middle classes, every dollar spent cycles through the economy ten times and grows our GDP. When wealth is consolidated at the top, the money is simply hoarded and doesn't benefit anyone but the billionaires. Giving billionaires a tax cut does nothing for the billionaires or the economy. Do you understand how much a billion dollars is? They are not doing anything extra with the hundreds of thousands in taxes they are not going to be paying. And for what? So seniors get kicked out of nursing homes and poor kids from Appalachia lose SNAP benefits. What is the value there?
This analysis is garbage. The rich have become richer in this economy. They have not become poorer. If your analysis were correct, their wealth would have fallen. You cannot even preserve capital in an inflationary economy without investing it, ie, putting it back into the economy in the form of stocks, acquisitions. Etc.
How do stocks and acquisitions help the middle and lower classes?
The middle class boom for this country occurred when taxes for the rich were much higher. Now the middle class is vanishing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is so evil and blatant to start the bill right after mid terms. People are so easily manipulated and duped. I’m scared for this country.
And republicans do this every time they pass a crappy bill. And voters fall for it over and over again.
Check out the "infrastructure" built with Build Back Better.
How much do you pay for health care vs pre-Obamacare?
Were you able to "keep your doctor?"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Short term the bill will give me tax cuts, which means I keep more of my paycheck. Also I don't understand the obsession on the left with billionaires getting tax cuts. They are just going to pass down higher taxes to consumers or move their businesses and jobs overseas and so the whole point of tax cuts for them is to keep business here flowing through the US economy.
With that I agree with Musk that increased national Debt is not good and we should've stayed the course of trying to cut spending, even if the tax cuts aren't as generous. This is a gamble that or may not pay off.
And finally im not at all convinced I would be any more pleased with a democrat sponsored bill if they were in power.
When money goes to the lower and middle classes, every dollar spent cycles through the economy ten times and grows our GDP. When wealth is consolidated at the top, the money is simply hoarded and doesn't benefit anyone but the billionaires. Giving billionaires a tax cut does nothing for the billionaires or the economy. Do you understand how much a billion dollars is? They are not doing anything extra with the hundreds of thousands in taxes they are not going to be paying. And for what? So seniors get kicked out of nursing homes and poor kids from Appalachia lose SNAP benefits. What is the value there?
This analysis is garbage. The rich have become richer in this economy. They have not become poorer. If your analysis were correct, their wealth would have fallen. You cannot even preserve capital in an inflationary economy without investing it, ie, putting it back into the economy in the form of stocks, acquisitions. Etc.