Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This debate is only good for the entertainment value, but there are people that really believe this stuff. What's going on in your area and even at your age group in that area are really all that should matter to you. Things are always changing and the impending school year change is going to shift things again. Arlington boys joining MLS Next is also going to change things by sending their girls elsewhere. Sorry I couldn't help myself

???

This is not going to happen. It can't. They would lose almost all of their girls.

its a half joke because folks thought it was going to get announced next season. It will just in 2 yrs instead of one. Arlington is bleeding boy players right now to MLSN and Academy. And no when there are no ECNL options it will have no impacts on girls side.

What a weird take - girls pay the same amount as boys, so if Arlington keeps ECNL and can field two ECNL teams, then you get even more girls ... who pay the same as boys.

So either it's all about the money, in which case Arlington to will do just fine because there are more girls wanting to play ECNL, or it's not about the money ad you just think boys are somehow more important than girls.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This debate is only good for the entertainment value, but there are people that really believe this stuff. What's going on in your area and even at your age group in that area are really all that should matter to you. Things are always changing and the impending school year change is going to shift things again. Arlington boys joining MLS Next is also going to change things by sending their girls elsewhere. Sorry I couldn't help myself

???

This is not going to happen. It can't. They would lose almost all of their girls.

its a half joke because folks thought it was going to get announced next season. It will just in 2 yrs instead of one. Arlington is bleeding boy players right now to MLSN and Academy. And no when there are no ECNL options it will have no impacts on girls side.

What a weird take - girls pay the same amount as boys, so if Arlington keeps ECNL and can field two ECNL teams, then you get even more girls ... who pay the same as boys.

So either it's all about the money, in which case Arlington to will do just fine because there are more girls wanting to play ECNL, or it's not about the money ad you just think boys are somehow more important than girls.

Nobody thinks this just look at the cost balance sheet at any socccer club in any state across the nation. Boys are more profitable so yes unfortunately boys are somehow more important than girls in the pay to play soccer landscape. Wake the F up! Arlington will sell out girls ECNL to acquire Boys MSLN and thus GA. Deal with it while waking the F up! Not mad just irritated at the stupidity that never ends.

The primary motivator for all of these clubs is their balance sheet?

No, its Development (with a straight face)

I think a lot of these coaches directors do care about the players and development. Not all of them are driven by money.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This debate is only good for the entertainment value, but there are people that really believe this stuff. What's going on in your area and even at your age group in that area are really all that should matter to you. Things are always changing and the impending school year change is going to shift things again. Arlington boys joining MLS Next is also going to change things by sending their girls elsewhere. Sorry I couldn't help myself

???

This is not going to happen. It can't. They would lose almost all of their girls.

its a half joke because folks thought it was going to get announced next season. It will just in 2 yrs instead of one. Arlington is bleeding boy players right now to MLSN and Academy. And no when there are no ECNL options it will have no impacts on girls side.

What a weird take - girls pay the same amount as boys, so if Arlington keeps ECNL and can field two ECNL teams, then you get even more girls ... who pay the same as boys.

So either it's all about the money, in which case Arlington to will do just fine because there are more girls wanting to play ECNL, or it's not about the money ad you just think boys are somehow more important than girls.

Nobody thinks this just look at the cost balance sheet at any socccer club in any state across the nation. Boys are more profitable so yes unfortunately boys are somehow more important than girls in the pay to play soccer landscape. Wake the F up! Arlington will sell out girls ECNL to acquire Boys MSLN and thus GA. Deal with it while waking the F up! Not mad just irritated at the stupidity that never ends.

The primary motivator for all of these clubs is their balance sheet?

No, its Development (with a straight face)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This debate is only good for the entertainment value, but there are people that really believe this stuff. What's going on in your area and even at your age group in that area are really all that should matter to you. Things are always changing and the impending school year change is going to shift things again. Arlington boys joining MLS Next is also going to change things by sending their girls elsewhere. Sorry I couldn't help myself

???

This is not going to happen. It can't. They would lose almost all of their girls.

its a half joke because folks thought it was going to get announced next season. It will just in 2 yrs instead of one. Arlington is bleeding boy players right now to MLSN and Academy. And no when there are no ECNL options it will have no impacts on girls side.

What a weird take - girls pay the same amount as boys, so if Arlington keeps ECNL and can field two ECNL teams, then you get even more girls ... who pay the same as boys.

So either it's all about the money, in which case Arlington to will do just fine because there are more girls wanting to play ECNL, or it's not about the money ad you just think boys are somehow more important than girls.

Nobody thinks this just look at the cost balance sheet at any socccer club in any state across the nation. Boys are more profitable so yes unfortunately boys are somehow more important than girls in the pay to play soccer landscape. Wake the F up! Arlington will sell out girls ECNL to acquire Boys MSLN and thus GA. Deal with it while waking the F up! Not mad just irritated at the stupidity that never ends.

The primary motivator for all of these clubs is their balance sheet?

Profot margins? Pick a busines term that makes you happy. It irrelevant to the point that boys make more money then girls. So business models favor what's best for boys. Becuase its a business, sinking in yet?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This debate is only good for the entertainment value, but there are people that really believe this stuff. What's going on in your area and even at your age group in that area are really all that should matter to you. Things are always changing and the impending school year change is going to shift things again. Arlington boys joining MLS Next is also going to change things by sending their girls elsewhere. Sorry I couldn't help myself

???

This is not going to happen. It can't. They would lose almost all of their girls.

its a half joke because folks thought it was going to get announced next season. It will just in 2 yrs instead of one. Arlington is bleeding boy players right now to MLSN and Academy. And no when there are no ECNL options it will have no impacts on girls side.

What a weird take - girls pay the same amount as boys, so if Arlington keeps ECNL and can field two ECNL teams, then you get even more girls ... who pay the same as boys.

So either it's all about the money, in which case Arlington to will do just fine because there are more girls wanting to play ECNL, or it's not about the money ad you just think boys are somehow more important than girls.

The money is with the Boys, from the National teams on down. The USWNT has won World Cups, Gold medals, etc and were still fighting for equal pay with a group that hasn't won anything. Even look at ECNL, you hear ECNL and immediately think of a Girls league, but ECNL has like 30 more Boys clubs than it has Girls. Boys Soccer is truly where the money is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This debate is only good for the entertainment value, but there are people that really believe this stuff. What's going on in your area and even at your age group in that area are really all that should matter to you. Things are always changing and the impending school year change is going to shift things again. Arlington boys joining MLS Next is also going to change things by sending their girls elsewhere. Sorry I couldn't help myself

???

This is not going to happen. It can't. They would lose almost all of their girls.

its a half joke because folks thought it was going to get announced next season. It will just in 2 yrs instead of one. Arlington is bleeding boy players right now to MLSN and Academy. And no when there are no ECNL options it will have no impacts on girls side.

What a weird take - girls pay the same amount as boys, so if Arlington keeps ECNL and can field two ECNL teams, then you get even more girls ... who pay the same as boys.

So either it's all about the money, in which case Arlington to will do just fine because there are more girls wanting to play ECNL, or it's not about the money ad you just think boys are somehow more important than girls.

Nobody thinks this just look at the cost balance sheet at any socccer club in any state across the nation. Boys are more profitable so yes unfortunately boys are somehow more important than girls in the pay to play soccer landscape. Wake the F up! Arlington will sell out girls ECNL to acquire Boys MSLN and thus GA. Deal with it while waking the F up! Not mad just irritated at the stupidity that never ends.

The primary motivator for all of these clubs is their balance sheet?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This debate is only good for the entertainment value, but there are people that really believe this stuff. What's going on in your area and even at your age group in that area are really all that should matter to you. Things are always changing and the impending school year change is going to shift things again. Arlington boys joining MLS Next is also going to change things by sending their girls elsewhere. Sorry I couldn't help myself

???

This is not going to happen. It can't. They would lose almost all of their girls.

its a half joke because folks thought it was going to get announced next season. It will just in 2 yrs instead of one. Arlington is bleeding boy players right now to MLSN and Academy. And no when there are no ECNL options it will have no impacts on girls side.

What a weird take - girls pay the same amount as boys, so if Arlington keeps ECNL and can field two ECNL teams, then you get even more girls ... who pay the same as boys.

So either it's all about the money, in which case Arlington to will do just fine because there are more girls wanting to play ECNL, or it's not about the money ad you just think boys are somehow more important than girls.

Nobody thinks this just look at the cost balance sheet at any socccer club in any state across the nation. Boys are more profitable so yes unfortunately boys are somehow more important than girls in the pay to play soccer landscape. Wake the F up! Arlington will sell out girls ECNL to acquire Boys MSLN and thus GA. Deal with it while waking the F up! Not mad just irritated at the stupidity that never ends.

The primary motivator for all of these clubs is their balance sheet?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This debate is only good for the entertainment value, but there are people that really believe this stuff. What's going on in your area and even at your age group in that area are really all that should matter to you. Things are always changing and the impending school year change is going to shift things again. Arlington boys joining MLS Next is also going to change things by sending their girls elsewhere. Sorry I couldn't help myself

???

This is not going to happen. It can't. They would lose almost all of their girls.

its a half joke because folks thought it was going to get announced next season. It will just in 2 yrs instead of one. Arlington is bleeding boy players right now to MLSN and Academy. And no when there are no ECNL options it will have no impacts on girls side.

What a weird take - girls pay the same amount as boys, so if Arlington keeps ECNL and can field two ECNL teams, then you get even more girls ... who pay the same as boys.

So either it's all about the money, in which case Arlington to will do just fine because there are more girls wanting to play ECNL, or it's not about the money ad you just think boys are somehow more important than girls.