Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch out for SJC!!! Didn't lose much and very strong Freshman Class. Those seniors last year along with their new coach changed the culture of SJC Girl's lacrosse for the foreseeable future. No mean girls!

GC will handle them like last year.

I'm hearing otherwise. The pendulum swings in the WCAC this year.

Delusional- Biggest holes at St. John's are the goalie position and midfield.

Rational post ahead: First, I would say that GC should still be favored to defend their title again. That said, the PP is far from "delusional". Your critiques also miss the mark.

The SJC goalie is solid, returning for senior year, and their midfield is far from a weakness. All three starting midfielders made all-conference, two as freshmen, and their returning senior captain was, and will be again, a legit WCAC POY candidate. You may want to review your scouting card there.

Does the WCAC select POY from the 2nd or 3rd place team?

POY last year played at PVI.

odd

Not odd if you paid attention, player is now at Florida and did everything for her team but play goalie. GC was riddled with injuries during the year and no player really stood out. GC coach didn't even nominate anyone from his team.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch out for SJC!!! Didn't lose much and very strong Freshman Class. Those seniors last year along with their new coach changed the culture of SJC Girl's lacrosse for the foreseeable future. No mean girls!

GC will handle them like last year.

I'm hearing otherwise. The pendulum swings in the WCAC this year.

Delusional- Biggest holes at St. John's are the goalie position and midfield.

Rational post ahead: First, I would say that GC should still be favored to defend their title again. That said, the PP is far from "delusional". Your critiques also miss the mark.

The SJC goalie is solid, returning for senior year, and their midfield is far from a weakness. All three starting midfielders made all-conference, two as freshmen, and their returning senior captain was, and will be again, a legit WCAC POY candidate. You may want to review your scouting card there.

Does the WCAC select POY from the 2nd or 3rd place team?

POY last year played at PVI.

odd

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch out for SJC!!! Didn't lose much and very strong Freshman Class. Those seniors last year along with their new coach changed the culture of SJC Girl's lacrosse for the foreseeable future. No mean girls!

GC will handle them like last year.

I'm hearing otherwise. The pendulum swings in the WCAC this year.

Delusional- Biggest holes at St. John's are the goalie position and midfield.

Rational post ahead: First, I would say that GC should still be favored to defend their title again. That said, the PP is far from "delusional". Your critiques also miss the mark.

The SJC goalie is solid, returning for senior year, and their midfield is far from a weakness. All three starting midfielders made all-conference, two as freshmen, and their returning senior captain was, and will be again, a legit WCAC POY candidate. You may want to review your scouting card there.

Does the WCAC select POY from the 2nd or 3rd place team?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch out for SJC!!! Didn't lose much and very strong Freshman Class. Those seniors last year along with their new coach changed the culture of SJC Girl's lacrosse for the foreseeable future. No mean girls!

GC will handle them like last year.

I'm hearing otherwise. The pendulum swings in the WCAC this year.

Delusional- Biggest holes at St. John's are the goalie position and midfield.

Rational post ahead: First, I would say that GC should still be favored to defend their title again. That said, the PP is far from "delusional". Your critiques also miss the mark.

The SJC goalie is solid, returning for senior year, and their midfield is far from a weakness. All three starting midfielders made all-conference, two as freshmen, and their returning senior captain was, and will be again, a legit WCAC POY candidate. You may want to review your scouting card there.

Does the WCAC select POY from the 2nd or 3rd place team?

POY last year played at PVI.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch out for SJC!!! Didn't lose much and very strong Freshman Class. Those seniors last year along with their new coach changed the culture of SJC Girl's lacrosse for the foreseeable future. No mean girls!

GC will handle them like last year.

I'm hearing otherwise. The pendulum swings in the WCAC this year.

Delusional- Biggest holes at St. John's are the goalie position and midfield.

Rational post ahead: First, I would say that GC should still be favored to defend their title again. That said, the PP is far from "delusional". Your critiques also miss the mark.

The SJC goalie is solid, returning for senior year, and their midfield is far from a weakness. All three starting midfielders made all-conference, two as freshmen, and their returning senior captain was, and will be again, a legit WCAC POY candidate. You may want to review your scouting card there.

Does the WCAC select POY from the 2nd or 3rd place team?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch out for SJC!!! Didn't lose much and very strong Freshman Class. Those seniors last year along with their new coach changed the culture of SJC Girl's lacrosse for the foreseeable future. No mean girls!

GC will handle them like last year.

I'm hearing otherwise. The pendulum swings in the WCAC this year.

Delusional- Biggest holes at St. John's are the goalie position and midfield.

Rational post ahead: First, I would say that GC should still be favored to defend their title again. That said, the PP is far from "delusional". Your critiques also miss the mark.

The SJC goalie is solid, returning for senior year, and their midfield is far from a weakness. All three starting midfielders made all-conference, two as freshmen, and their returning senior captain was, and will be again, a legit WCAC POY candidate. You may want to review your scouting card there.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch out for SJC!!! Didn't lose much and very strong Freshman Class. Those seniors last year along with their new coach changed the culture of SJC Girl's lacrosse for the foreseeable future. No mean girls!

GC will handle them like last year.

I'm hearing otherwise. The pendulum swings in the WCAC this year.

Delusional- Biggest holes at St. John's are the goalie position and midfield.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch out for SJC!!! Didn't lose much and very strong Freshman Class. Those seniors last year along with their new coach changed the culture of SJC Girl's lacrosse for the foreseeable future. No mean girls!

GC will handle them like last year.

I'm hearing otherwise. The pendulum swings in the WCAC this year.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch out for SJC!!! Didn't lose much and very strong Freshman Class. Those seniors last year along with their new coach changed the culture of SJC Girl's lacrosse for the foreseeable future. No mean girls!

GC will handle them like last year.

I'm hearing otherwise. The pendulum swings in the WCAC this year.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch out for SJC!!! Didn't lose much and very strong Freshman Class. Those seniors last year along with their new coach changed the culture of SJC Girl's lacrosse for the foreseeable future. No mean girls!

GC will handle them like last year.

Anonymous wrote:Can she coach? How did she do in her public HS roles at Independence and Stone Bridge. Any good playoff runs? She will certainly have more talent to work with at PVI.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good for Visi to lock down an internal option and point toward the new season.

This Spring is going to be a good one. 4-5 teams across ISL and WCAC will be very competitive and could rise to the top.

SR and SSSAS probably look strongest on paper, but GC is a perennial power these days.

Visi is likely being underestimated. Potomac lost a lot, but not everything. SJC has a second year with their new coach and lots of returning contributors.

Who has the strongest 2029s? Any contributors expected from this group for the top teams across ISL and WCAC? Haight and KJ don't let Freshman play, of course, but I imagine they could help some of the others.

Can PVI and BI reset and be competitive after losing their top players?

My early pre-season take

1. GC
2. SR
3. Saints
4. SJC
5. Potomac
6. VISI

It should be SSSA for ISL champs. They’ve basically gutted the future of the program to get a championship with this senior class. It’s now or never.

For those picking the Saints for ISL, what is your confidence level that they can avoid the late-season swoon that hit them last year? They looked to be the strongest team in the ISL up until the last 7-10 days. SR, on the other hand, got better toward the final weeks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More interested in her coaching.

Obviously, the Pride separation was not ideal, but sounds like full exoneration, and old news in any case. Let's stick to lacrosse.

Is her DD on PVI team?

Designated Driver?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More interested in her coaching.

Obviously, the Pride separation was not ideal, but sounds like full exoneration, and old news in any case. Let's stick to lacrosse.

Is her DD on PVI team?