Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This guy really tried. He made a vallant effort to fit the theme (black dandyism) and put himself out there. Not insulting, really serious. I admire this effort more than those who played it safe.
Is this the priest from Fleabag?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anne Hathaway
wow, as boring and plain as I've ever seen her
Yeah, very meh.
All the clothes I've seen so far are pretty meh. This in particular is channeling something Sharon Stone and Meryl Streep have both worn over the years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fascinated by Pamela Anderson. Who would've thought she'd be the one wearing no makeup. Her face is beautiful and it's a very cool move to brave wearing no makeup ( or close to it) in your 60s or whatever she is.
She’s been wearing no make up for quite a while now
Agreed, and I think it's all about having been so sexualized her whole career. Her gown looks like a suit of armor. I think it's great that she is making a statement, but I hate her hair and her dress. I don't see any cohesive message here. Suit of armor . . . except for her top which looks pretty well accentuated. Cropped bangs like she's a child or 20-something. A miss for me.
Love Kerry Washington's look, though seems more like summer tea party than Met Gala.
Anonymous wrote:Pharrell and his wife.
![]()
Sydney Sweeny.
![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree the outfits are very boring. In a rare turn, many of the men look better and more interesting than the women. Seems like people either didn't understand the theme, didn't want to engage, or I don't get it. The third option is completely possibl, I am also so lame that I don't recognize half these people
You're not lame. In an effort to make Black artists and celebrities more visible, a lot of less-famous people were invited. Which I suppose is a good thing, especially in this current political context.
But this makes them less visible because it makes the event look like its losing its luster, as up an comer, I would want to be seen with the stars, not with just a bunch of other people like me. This generation doesn't not like to play the "game" but sometimes you have to.
There are some very famous stars, PP. You're not paying attention: Diana Ross, Janelle Monae, ASAP Rocky, etc. You might not like their music or their movies, but they're legitimately famous in their own right.
Please don't speak to me directly and tell me what I am or am not doing. Leave the word "you" out of discussion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
![]()
Is this Melania??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree the outfits are very boring. In a rare turn, many of the men look better and more interesting than the women. Seems like people either didn't understand the theme, didn't want to engage, or I don't get it. The third option is completely possibl, I am also so lame that I don't recognize half these people
You're not lame. In an effort to make Black artists and celebrities more visible, a lot of less-famous people were invited. Which I suppose is a good thing, especially in this current political context.
But this makes them less visible because it makes the event look like its losing its luster, as up an comer, I would want to be seen with the stars, not with just a bunch of other people like me. This generation doesn't not like to play the "game" but sometimes you have to.
Anonymous wrote:
I blame Louis Vuitton, they dressed her. Next year, I suggest pants.
Anonymous wrote:Can someone post a photo of Nicole Kidman?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone post a photo of Nicole Kidman?
![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Meg the Stallion
![]()