Anonymous wrote:I agree with all this. I also can't stand that goofy smile he always.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm halfway through the season and I'm enjoying it, but something about it is falling flat- can't quite put my finger on it. Sort of reminds me of The White Lotus but lacking depth, stronger writing?
I mean, it is lacking depth. The characters are one dimensional caricatures. It’s not a well written show, but it’s about wealthy people so it’s entertaining. A lot of shows that lack substance just use wealth to draw viewers in and it works.
I hate to sound mean, but Jon hamm is also terrible in this role. He was great in mad men, and I liked him in the small role he had in Friends with kids, but he’s not really convincing in this role.
True about Barney’s wife. And we saw how messed up her parents were too. I think they could add an interesting element to the show if we got more of this family.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was an easy watch. I have a feeling season 2 is going to suck, but I’ll watch anyway. I actually liked Sam, so was kind of bummed how she turned out. I can’t stand Mel, I hope her and Coop don’t get back together in the next season. Barney and his family were the most interesting and likable IMO. I hope they get more of a storyline in the next Season.
Ugh, I found Barney’s wife to be seriously selfish and overly materialistic. I liked Mel but was so tired of Nick - glad they broke up.
One thing I like about Jon Hamm is the way he plays a father - without having any kids of his own. He’s very believable in that role.
I thought it was weird that there was no big cliffhanger at the end.Anonymous wrote:I thought the ending was boring and flat. It wrapped up too much too perfectly. And the rolling stone song playing montage was trite.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone still watching this? Want to discuss the finale? I was really hoping that there'd be a cliffhanger with the police detective matching Coop's fingerprints to the stolen watch somehow. All in all, this was kind of a waste of time but I'm sure i'll end up watching Season 2 b/c I love Amanda Peet.
I kind of loved the ending - wasn’t expecting that at all! You’d think that a person who barely escaped serious jail time might okay it safe from then on, but apparently not! 😀
Anonymous wrote:It was an easy watch. I have a feeling season 2 is going to suck, but I’ll watch anyway. I actually liked Sam, so was kind of bummed how she turned out. I can’t stand Mel, I hope her and Coop don’t get back together in the next season. Barney and his family were the most interesting and likable IMO. I hope they get more of a storyline in the next Season.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone still watching this? Want to discuss the finale? I was really hoping that there'd be a cliffhanger with the police detective matching Coop's fingerprints to the stolen watch somehow. All in all, this was kind of a waste of time but I'm sure i'll end up watching Season 2 b/c I love Amanda Peet.
Anonymous wrote:9 episodes, this was the finale.Anonymous wrote:This season is supposed to have 10 episodes, correct? This week’s seems like a finale
Anonymous wrote:This show has been a ton of fun. We are looking forward to Season 2. Not every show needs depth.
9 episodes, this was the finale.Anonymous wrote:This season is supposed to have 10 episodes, correct? This week’s seems like a finale
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm halfway through the season and I'm enjoying it, but something about it is falling flat- can't quite put my finger on it. Sort of reminds me of The White Lotus but lacking depth, stronger writing?
I mean, it is lacking depth. The characters are one dimensional caricatures. It’s not a well written show, but it’s about wealthy people so it’s entertaining. A lot of shows that lack substance just use wealth to draw viewers in and it works.
I hate to sound mean, but Jon hamm is also terrible in this role. He was great in mad men, and I liked him in the small role he had in friends with kids, but he’s not really convincing in this role.
I loved him as Don Draper but I think he is good in this role. It seems a lot closer to his actual personality.
I agree with all this. I also can't stand that goofy smile he always.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm halfway through the season and I'm enjoying it, but something about it is falling flat- can't quite put my finger on it. Sort of reminds me of The White Lotus but lacking depth, stronger writing?
I mean, it is lacking depth. The characters are one dimensional caricatures. It’s not a well written show, but it’s about wealthy people so it’s entertaining. A lot of shows that lack substance just use wealth to draw viewers in and it works.
I hate to sound mean, but Jon hamm is also terrible in this role. He was great in mad men, and I liked him in the small role he had in Friends with kids, but he’s not really convincing in this role.