Anonymous wrote:Yes, facts are important. Not even 15-18 months have passed since they lost Ga

Anonymous wrote:Yes, facts are important. Not even 15-18 months have passed since they lost Ga

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, hopefully they won’t get it. Really not deserving.

ASA policing this thread is crazy, on the clock. Def, not a good look.

It's not ASA, Its ARL. Which boggles me since they are ECNL unless they are worried when they go GA the following year?

No, nothing to do with Arlington, this is an Alexandria thread. Don’t try to mix them up, and divert the attention.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The college recruits I saw that ASS posted were to no name schools.

Is the point to get into college or are you hoping your kid gets that million dollar contract? Is a no name not accredited? I hear so many kids parents acting like it is D1 or bust but they are not bright enough to look as a fan vs parent and say does my kid really cut it? So many times I we hear them blame coach. Coach not playing my kid I right position or my kid was just getting involved and they pull them out. Especially with such weak conferences.

The argument could me made about you. You're, not bright enough to see Alexandria does not currently deserve GA. You just want it.

Not so nice is it? Stop handing out insults because someone doesn't agree with you. It's low class and petty. The "againsters" are making more persuasive arguments.

What exactly did this person say that is low class? You berate a kid going to a no name college? Going to ANY college in this country is an achievement. This digs deeper into privileged people thinking if you don't go to a Duke you are beneath them. Realistically people like you are the same type that only feel certain classes should be playing soccer. So it's actually you that are low class and petty

This goes well beyond the point and again disperses the attention. The girls' program does not have the pool players/coaching to compete: it's just facts, and there is no berating at all, dear ASA keyboard warrior.

This never makes any sense. 1. Girls' program not in a "top league" so talent leaves to join clubs that are in the leagues. 2. Follow me now... that means that the talent/parents are ultimately attracted to the league status. 3. Insert your complaint of "does not have the pool players/coaching to compete." Ummm, the pool isn't as strong because of point 1 and the majority of parents equate team talent with good coaching when that's not the case. So how about you simply wait and see how things look a few years down the line. Because in your short memories Arlington were world beaters when they joined ECNL less than FOUR years ago. Adjusting for the two teams removed, they have gotten better as a club overall, but nothing drastic that suggests anything more than they were able to retain more of their players and have more continuity in development. Girls soccer has gotten the short end of the stick forever and now everyone's piling on when more options are presented that will eventually push the game further. The previous poster mentioning privilege definitely wasn't too far off. And if you think they are, why so much energy into tearing down a program that you don't think will succeed anyway?

Arlington 2021-22 standings (14 teams)
U13 - 7th
U14 - 3rd
U15 - 8th
U16 - 9th
U17 - 11th
U18 - 13th

Current Season (12 teams)

U13 - 2nd
U14 - 1st
U15 - 6th
U16 - 4th
U17 - 8th
U18 - 5th

Let's be real here. We know the stats can be easily manipulated. The VEOs dont lie

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, hopefully they won’t get it. Really not deserving.

ASA policing this thread is crazy, on the clock. Def, not a good look.

It's not ASA, Its ARL. Which boggles me since they are ECNL unless they are worried when they go GA the following year?

Anonymous wrote:Yes, hopefully they won’t get it. Really not deserving.

ASA policing this thread is crazy, on the clock. Def, not a good look.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The college recruits I saw that ASS posted were to no name schools.

Is the point to get into college or are you hoping your kid gets that million dollar contract? Is a no name not accredited? I hear so many kids parents acting like it is D1 or bust but they are not bright enough to look as a fan vs parent and say does my kid really cut it? So many times I we hear them blame coach. Coach not playing my kid I right position or my kid was just getting involved and they pull them out. Especially with such weak conferences.

The argument could me made about you. You're, not bright enough to see Alexandria does not currently deserve GA. You just want it.

Not so nice is it? Stop handing out insults because someone doesn't agree with you. It's low class and petty. The "againsters" are making more persuasive arguments.

What exactly did this person say that is low class? You berate a kid going to a no name college? Going to ANY college in this country is an achievement. This digs deeper into privileged people thinking if you don't go to a Duke you are beneath them. Realistically people like you are the same type that only feel certain classes should be playing soccer. So it's actually you that are low class and petty

This goes well beyond the point and again disperses the attention. The girls' program does not have the pool players/coaching to compete: it's just facts, and there is no berating at all, dear ASA keyboard warrior.

This never makes any sense. 1. Girls' program not in a "top league" so talent leaves to join clubs that are in the leagues. 2. Follow me now... that means that the talent/parents are ultimately attracted to the league status. 3. Insert your complaint of "does not have the pool players/coaching to compete." Ummm, the pool isn't as strong because of point 1 and the majority of parents equate team talent with good coaching when that's not the case. So how about you simply wait and see how things look a few years down the line. Because in your short memories Arlington were world beaters when they joined ECNL less than FOUR years ago. Adjusting for the two teams removed, they have gotten better as a club overall, but nothing drastic that suggests anything more than they were able to retain more of their players and have more continuity in development. Girls soccer has gotten the short end of the stick forever and now everyone's piling on when more options are presented that will eventually push the game further. The previous poster mentioning privilege definitely wasn't too far off. And if you think they are, why so much energy into tearing down a program that you don't think will succeed anyway?

Arlington 2021-22 standings (14 teams)
U13 - 7th
U14 - 3rd
U15 - 8th
U16 - 9th
U17 - 11th
U18 - 13th

Current Season (12 teams)

U13 - 2nd
U14 - 1st
U15 - 6th
U16 - 4th
U17 - 8th
U18 - 5th

Let's be real here. We know the stats can be easily manipulated. The VEOs dont lie

Wow, you are using Arlington to make a comparison with ASA? They are levels above in their program. Remember, you got kicked out!! No one is manipulating stats, just facts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The college recruits I saw that ASS posted were to no name schools.

Is the point to get into college or are you hoping your kid gets that million dollar contract? Is a no name not accredited? I hear so many kids parents acting like it is D1 or bust but they are not bright enough to look as a fan vs parent and say does my kid really cut it? So many times I we hear them blame coach. Coach not playing my kid I right position or my kid was just getting involved and they pull them out. Especially with such weak conferences.

The argument could me made about you. You're, not bright enough to see Alexandria does not currently deserve GA. You just want it.

Not so nice is it? Stop handing out insults because someone doesn't agree with you. It's low class and petty. The "againsters" are making more persuasive arguments.

What exactly did this person say that is low class? You berate a kid going to a no name college? Going to ANY college in this country is an achievement. This digs deeper into privileged people thinking if you don't go to a Duke you are beneath them. Realistically people like you are the same type that only feel certain classes should be playing soccer. So it's actually you that are low class and petty

This goes well beyond the point and again disperses the attention. The girls' program does not have the pool players/coaching to compete: it's just facts, and there is no berating at all, dear ASA keyboard warrior.

This never makes any sense. 1. Girls' program not in a "top league" so talent leaves to join clubs that are in the leagues. 2. Follow me now... that means that the talent/parents are ultimately attracted to the league status. 3. Insert your complaint of "does not have the pool players/coaching to compete." Ummm, the pool isn't as strong because of point 1 and the majority of parents equate team talent with good coaching when that's not the case. So how about you simply wait and see how things look a few years down the line. Because in your short memories Arlington were world beaters when they joined ECNL less than FOUR years ago. Adjusting for the two teams removed, they have gotten better as a club overall, but nothing drastic that suggests anything more than they were able to retain more of their players and have more continuity in development. Girls soccer has gotten the short end of the stick forever and now everyone's piling on when more options are presented that will eventually push the game further. The previous poster mentioning privilege definitely wasn't too far off. And if you think they are, why so much energy into tearing down a program that you don't think will succeed anyway?

Arlington 2021-22 standings (14 teams)
U13 - 7th
U14 - 3rd
U15 - 8th
U16 - 9th
U17 - 11th
U18 - 13th

Current Season (12 teams)

U13 - 2nd
U14 - 1st
U15 - 6th
U16 - 4th
U17 - 8th
U18 - 5th

Let's be real here. We know the stats can be easily manipulated. The VEOs dont lie