Anonymous wrote:I did cry tonight in front of my first grader. This is it guys. The US is over. Or maybe it won't have ripple effects outside of DC .... /S
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do we think the government will own up to how many people it eventually terminates this year? I suspect not, though I suppose that might be FOIA'able
Presumably we see something in the jobs numbers but I don’t know that that will be broken out by sector
This has got to be massive. The huge numbers of those who took the fork alone will drastically increase unemployment.
But these firings? These will be much much bigger. No one is going to have a job soon.
We are looking at The Great Depression 2.0 here folks.
The Forkers - if they weren’t fired today - are still technically employed, so they should increase the unemployment nos.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do we think the government will own up to how many people it eventually terminates this year? I suspect not, though I suppose that might be FOIA'able
Presumably we see something in the jobs numbers but I don’t know that that will be broken out by sector
This has got to be massive. The huge numbers of those who took the fork alone will drastically increase unemployment.
But these firings? These will be much much bigger. No one is going to have a job soon.
We are looking at The Great Depression 2.0 here folks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do we think the government will own up to how many people it eventually terminates this year? I suspect not, though I suppose that might be FOIA'able
Presumably we see something in the jobs numbers but I don’t know that that will be broken out by sector
This has got to be massive. The huge numbers of those who took the fork alone will drastically increase unemployment.
But these firings? These will be much much bigger. No one is going to have a job soon.
We are looking at The Great Depression 2.0 here folks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do we think the government will own up to how many people it eventually terminates this year? I suspect not, though I suppose that might be FOIA'able
Presumably we see something in the jobs numbers but I don’t know that that will be broken out by sector
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DOE let go of most of their probationary staff today. It’s been a gut wrenching sort of day to tell smart STEM professionals who you recruited away from industry and who moved their families that they were being let go.
Department of Energy? Or are you one of those idiots who is calling ED DOE?
Anonymous wrote:I heard secondhand that attorneys in the probationary period are exempt from the cuts. Is that correct?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DOE let go of most of their probationary staff today. It’s been a gut wrenching sort of day to tell smart STEM professionals who you recruited away from industry and who moved their families that they were being let go.
Department of Energy? Or are you one of those idiots who is calling ED DOE?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am anticipating a huge increase in deaths of despair. This is not right...lives are being ruined overnight.
X1000. I am close and not even probationary. This is all too much.
Anonymous wrote:DOE let go of most of their probationary staff today. It’s been a gut wrenching sort of day to tell smart STEM professionals who you recruited away from industry and who moved their families that they were being let go.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know quite a few people at CFPB who were fired this week. They are not probationary and they were supposedly fired for cause. No severence. Maybe they can convince the state to offer them unemployment, but goes against everything civil service laws are supposed to protect against.
Sorry to be clear - just firing them with no notice, no severence, no consideration of years of service - that's what goes against civil service protections.