Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The neighboring countries don’t want to take in the Palestinians not because they are Palestinian but because they simply do not have the economic ability to do so. There is little to no industry to support a mass influx of immigrants. They can barely manage their own population. Additionally, many of the people in Gaza have limited education (not because they don’t want it but because they aren’t allowed to have schools) and are women and children (all the men are dead) so just like we won’t take in all the immigrants from south and Central America despite our bounty of riches why is it even a consideration.

Here’s a thought. Why not allow the Palestinians to actually live like normal people, to be educated, receive adequate healthcare, farm, have industry occupy their time with productivity? Why is the answer sending them somewhere else? If Israel is so worried about its safety. (It’ll be surrounded by these same people) why not move themselves to Germany, they will be safe there.

They had plenty of opportunity within Gaza to build a strong society. The foreign aid they received was diverted instead to making preparations to invade Israel and to then resist the inevitable response. Aid from Iran was purely military in character. If their schools taught peace instead of instilling a commitment to eradicate Israel, a core policy foundation of Hamas, they might now be in a different position.

24/7/365 shoot-on-sight land, sea and air blockade. No airport. No control of access via land or sea. Constant buzzing of drones. Nothing goes in or out with direct Israeli control. Children shoot for picking up rocks, or for no reason at all.

GTFOH with this “plenty of opportunity” Zionism edging of yours …

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The neighboring countries don’t want to take in the Palestinians not because they are Palestinian but because they simply do not have the economic ability to do so. There is little to no industry to support a mass influx of immigrants. They can barely manage their own population. Additionally, many of the people in Gaza have limited education (not because they don’t want it but because they aren’t allowed to have schools) and are women and children (all the men are dead) so just like we won’t take in all the immigrants from south and Central America despite our bounty of riches why is it even a consideration.

Here’s a thought. Why not allow the Palestinians to actually live like normal people, to be educated, receive adequate healthcare, farm, have industry occupy their time with productivity? Why is the answer sending them somewhere else? If Israel is so worried about its safety. (It’ll be surrounded by these same people) why not move themselves to Germany, they will be safe there.

They had plenty of opportunity within Gaza to build a strong society. The foreign aid they received was diverted instead to making preparations to invade Israel and to then resist the inevitable response. Aid from Iran was purely military in character. If their schools taught peace instead of instilling a commitment to eradicate Israel, a core policy foundation of Hamas, they might now be in a different position.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The neighboring countries don’t want to take in the Palestinians not because they are Palestinian but because they simply do not have the economic ability to do so. There is little to no industry to support a mass influx of immigrants. They can barely manage their own population. Additionally, many of the people in Gaza have limited education (not because they don’t want it but because they aren’t allowed to have schools) and are women and children (all the men are dead) so just like we won’t take in all the immigrants from south and Central America despite our bounty of riches why is it even a consideration.

Here’s a thought. Why not allow the Palestinians to actually live like normal people, to be educated, receive adequate healthcare, farm, have industry occupy their time with productivity? Why is the answer sending them somewhere else? If Israel is so worried about its safety. (It’ll be surrounded by these same people) why not move themselves to Germany, they will be safe there.

They had plenty of opportunity within Gaza to build a strong society. The foreign aid they received was diverted instead to making preparations to invade Israel and to then resist the inevitable response. Aid from Iran was purely military in character. If their schools taught peace instead of instilling a commitment to eradicate Israel, a core policy foundation of Hamas, they might now be in a different position.

Anonymous wrote:I was told in good conscious they could not vote for Biden(Kamala) over Palestine. I wonder how they feel now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As if the neighboring countries, Egypt, Jordan and Lebnanon, don't already have millions of displaced Palestenians whose homes and land have been taken by Israel.

The only country that doesn't want to deal with the refugees they created is Israel. They want to ethnically cleanse like Germany did after WWII but is facing the same issue when the U.S. and Europe didn't want to take any refugees. Just look at the West Bank as further proof.

Israel is not evening honoring the ceasfire with Lebanon and is trying to stay permenantly in the south Lebnanon area and parts of Syria. This is Leibensraum.

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trump-says-he-wants-to-clean-out-gaza-send-refugees-to-egypt-and-jordan-d90beccc

How do the good people of Dearborn, Michigan feel about this?

I'm not sure why progressives seem to think deeply conservative Muslims ought to be their natural ally. Most religious Muslims have very little in common with progressives and their trans, equity, DEI, soft on crime agenda. It's a little mystifying why progressives are so enthusiastic for extremist Islamic groups. The feelings are not reciprocated. Most progressives would not be welcome in Gaza, Riyadh, or Tehran. It shouldn't be a surprise that Dearborn didn't want them either.

So you’re saying that Dearborn Muslims knowingly voted for Palestinians to be removed from Gaza?

DP....the Trump campaign certainly didn't hide this as a policy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The neighboring countries don’t want to take in the Palestinians not because they are Palestinian but because they simply do not have the economic ability to do so. There is little to no industry to support a mass influx of immigrants. They can barely manage their own population. Additionally, many of the people in Gaza have limited education (not because they don’t want it but because they aren’t allowed to have schools) and are women and children (all the men are dead) so just like we won’t take in all the immigrants from south and Central America despite our bounty of riches why is it even a consideration.

Here’s a thought. Why not allow the Palestinians to actually live like normal people, to be educated, receive adequate healthcare, farm, have industry occupy their time with productivity? Why is the answer sending them somewhere else? If Israel is so worried about its safety. (It’ll be surrounded by these same people) why not move themselves to Germany, they will be safe there.

They had plenty of opportunity within Gaza to build a strong society. The foreign aid they received was diverted instead to making preparations to invade Israel and to then resist the inevitable response. Aid from Iran was purely military in character. If their schools taught peace instead of instilling a commitment to eradicate Israel, a core policy foundation of Hamas, they might now be in a different position.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As if the neighboring countries, Egypt, Jordan and Lebnanon, don't already have millions of displaced Palestenians whose homes and land have been taken by Israel.

The only country that doesn't want to deal with the refugees they created is Israel. They want to ethnically cleanse like Germany did after WWII but is facing the same issue when the U.S. and Europe didn't want to take any refugees. Just look at the West Bank as further proof.

Israel is not evening honoring the ceasfire with Lebanon and is trying to stay permenantly in the south Lebnanon area and parts of Syria. This is Leibensraum.

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trump-says-he-wants-to-clean-out-gaza-send-refugees-to-egypt-and-jordan-d90beccc

How do the good people of Dearborn, Michigan feel about this?

I'm not sure why progressives seem to think deeply conservative Muslims ought to be their natural ally. Most religious Muslims have very little in common with progressives and their trans, equity, DEI, soft on crime agenda. It's a little mystifying why progressives are so enthusiastic for extremist Islamic groups. The feelings are not reciprocated. Most progressives would not be welcome in Gaza, Riyadh, or Tehran. It shouldn't be a surprise that Dearborn didn't want them either.

So you’re saying that Dearborn Muslims knowingly voted for Palestinians to be removed from Gaza?

DP....the Trump campaign certainly didn't hide this as a policy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As if the neighboring countries, Egypt, Jordan and Lebnanon, don't already have millions of displaced Palestenians whose homes and land have been taken by Israel.

The only country that doesn't want to deal with the refugees they created is Israel. They want to ethnically cleanse like Germany did after WWII but is facing the same issue when the U.S. and Europe didn't want to take any refugees. Just look at the West Bank as further proof.

Israel is not evening honoring the ceasfire with Lebanon and is trying to stay permenantly in the south Lebnanon area and parts of Syria. This is Leibensraum.

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trump-says-he-wants-to-clean-out-gaza-send-refugees-to-egypt-and-jordan-d90beccc

How do the good people of Dearborn, Michigan feel about this?

I'm not sure why progressives seem to think deeply conservative Muslims ought to be their natural ally. Most religious Muslims have very little in common with progressives and their trans, equity, DEI, soft on crime agenda. It's a little mystifying why progressives are so enthusiastic for extremist Islamic groups. The feelings are not reciprocated. Most progressives would not be welcome in Gaza, Riyadh, or Tehran. It shouldn't be a surprise that Dearborn didn't want them either.

So you’re saying that Dearborn Muslims knowingly voted for Palestinians to be removed from Gaza?

DP....the Trump campaign certainly didn't hide this as a policy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As if the neighboring countries, Egypt, Jordan and Lebnanon, don't already have millions of displaced Palestenians whose homes and land have been taken by Israel.

The only country that doesn't want to deal with the refugees they created is Israel. They want to ethnically cleanse like Germany did after WWII but is facing the same issue when the U.S. and Europe didn't want to take any refugees. Just look at the West Bank as further proof.

Israel is not evening honoring the ceasfire with Lebanon and is trying to stay permenantly in the south Lebnanon area and parts of Syria. This is Leibensraum.

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trump-says-he-wants-to-clean-out-gaza-send-refugees-to-egypt-and-jordan-d90beccc

How do the good people of Dearborn, Michigan feel about this?

I'm not sure why progressives seem to think deeply conservative Muslims ought to be their natural ally. Most religious Muslims have very little in common with progressives and their trans, equity, DEI, soft on crime agenda. It's a little mystifying why progressives are so enthusiastic for extremist Islamic groups. The feelings are not reciprocated. Most progressives would not be welcome in Gaza, Riyadh, or Tehran. It shouldn't be a surprise that Dearborn didn't want them either.

So you’re saying that Dearborn Muslims knowingly voted for Palestinians to be removed from Gaza?

Anonymous wrote:The title of this thread is fake news and it’s appalling to read.
Israel did not colonize the land, so you see all the archaeological finds or read about history? Different peoples were on this land including the Jews.
Secondly, BLAME HAMAS.
They are holding hostages and even for years, corpses. They don’t care about their people and they were given free rein of Gaza when Israel left.
Israel is not in the right for all it is doing but get a grip—it treats Gazans in its hospitals at this very moment. It wants to end terorrism not a group of people.

Anonymous wrote:The neighboring countries don’t want to take in the Palestinians not because they are Palestinian but because they simply do not have the economic ability to do so. There is little to no industry to support a mass influx of immigrants. They can barely manage their own population. Additionally, many of the people in Gaza have limited education (not because they don’t want it but because they aren’t allowed to have schools) and are women and children (all the men are dead) so just like we won’t take in all the immigrants from south and Central America despite our bounty of riches why is it even a consideration.

Here’s a thought. Why not allow the Palestinians to actually live like normal people, to be educated, receive adequate healthcare, farm, have industry occupy their time with productivity? Why is the answer sending them somewhere else? If Israel is so worried about its safety. (It’ll be surrounded by these same people) why not move themselves to Germany, they will be safe there.