Wikipedia:

In April and May 2020, United States President Donald Trump dismissed the inspectors general (IGs) of five cabinet departments in the space of six weeks.[1][2] The inspectors general removed were Michael K. Atkinson, Intelligence, on April 3; Glenn Fine (acting), Defense, April 7; Christi Grimm (acting), Health and Human Services, May 1; Mitch Behm (acting), Transportation, May 15; and Steve Linick, State, May 15.[3] In four of the cases the announcement was made late on a Friday night in a classic Friday news dump.[citation needed] In several cases the fired IGs had taken an action which Trump disliked, so that the dismissals were widely described as retaliation.[4] In two other cases, questions were raised about whether the dismissals related to ongoing IG investigations into the conduct of the cabinet secretary in charge of that department.[5][6] The cumulative firings were often described as a "purge"[7] or as a "war on watchdogs".[8][9]

Anonymous wrote:I’m assuming there is just cause and a new one will be hired. So what the problem?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m assuming there is just cause and a new one will be hired. So what the problem?

It’s 17 people at once, many in which he hired himself the first administration, not performance based.

Obv he didn’t like their performance and considering the poor job the last administration did and the state things have been left in, seems reasonable to replace some staff. People voted for him bc they want change

He violated the law

np Yes and he was supposed to notify Congress

Just a guess. He has people on the inside with evidence of specific wrong doing and those that were fired will not contest it if they are confronted with that evidence.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s the deal: Every time Trump fires anyone at a whim, they end up winning in the end. In the Fed, there are personnel rules and laws. You stray from them, you pay. Ask Andrew McCabe and the other FBI agents he “fired” during his last administration. Federal Judges reversed the firings, ordered back pay and the payment of punitive fines by DOJ. In the end, it’s the taxpayers who bears the brunt of these shoot from the hip decisions. They’re all likely millionaires now.

+million

The ignorance continues to take me by surprise.

Anonymous wrote:Here’s the deal: Every time Trump fires anyone at a whim, they end up winning in the end. In the Fed, there are personnel rules and laws. You stray from them, you pay. Ask Andrew McCabe and the other FBI agents he “fired” during his last administration. Federal Judges reversed the firings, ordered back pay and the payment of punitive fines by DOJ. In the end, it’s the taxpayers who bears the brunt of these shoot from the hip decisions. They’re all likely millionaires now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m assuming there is just cause and a new one will be hired. So what the problem?

It’s 17 people at once, many in which he hired himself the first administration, not performance based.

Obv he didn’t like their performance and considering the poor job the last administration did and the state things have been left in, seems reasonable to replace some staff. People voted for him bc they want change

He violated the law

np Yes and he was supposed to notify Congress

Just a guess. He has people on the inside with evidence of specific wrong doing and those that were fired will not contest it if they are confronted with that evidence.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m assuming there is just cause and a new one will be hired. So what the problem?

It’s 17 people at once, many in which he hired himself the first administration, not performance based.

Obv he didn’t like their performance and considering the poor job the last administration did and the state things have been left in, seems reasonable to replace some staff. People voted for him bc they want change

He violated the law

np Yes and he was supposed to notify Congress

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m assuming there is just cause and a new one will be hired. So what the problem?

It’s 17 people at once, many in which he hired himself the first administration, not performance based.

Obv he didn’t like their performance and considering the poor job the last administration did and the state things have been left in, seems reasonable to replace some staff. People voted for him bc they want change

He violated the law

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
ANYONE not doing their job,
MUST be FIRED.

Trump is a business person, not a lifelong dumbass politician, like Pelosi, Schumer and Chinese Mitch.

The Senate is going to ask for evidence that they weren't doing their jobs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGA may be gone in a few years, or in 30 years after a ruling as an autocracy.

But make no mistake, the stain of it will never wash off the people who participated and their children. I know, I've seen it before.

The frightening thing for me has been the dawning realization that a certain percent of the population has always had MAGA-type ideas: isolationism; an attitude of as long as I get mine, I don't care about anyone else; fear and/or hatred of the "other," particularly non-hetero people; discomfort with the growing number of non-white Americans; discomfort with the rise in economic and social power of women and what they perceive as the corresponding loss of that power in men; feelings of victimization; and so on and so forth.

Anonymous wrote:I’m assuming there is just cause and a new one will be hired. So what the problem?

Anonymous wrote:The problem is these Inspector General employees are loyal to somebody already and it will show in their work product. Can't hide it, just a fact.