Anonymous wrote:They aren't looking for your run of the mill people to fire from the probation list. They are looking for newly hired upper level GS who may have influence on policy, etc. Known people associated with the Biden administration. Agency leadership will flag those people for removal. Hopefully, they will also get rid of some poor performers across the board, although with the hiring freeze also in effect...a warm body is a warm body.
Anonymous wrote:When they fire someone in the probationary period, is there any access to unemployment benefits? Does pay get cut off immediately??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does this memo apply to someone in a new fed position who has been a fed employee for over 2 decades? Sorry if this has already been answered- just stressed about everything
Check your SF-50 from when you moved to your new position. It will say in the comments if you have a probation period. If it says nothing, you are fine for now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know offhand the probationary period for FDA - a lawyer in Regulatory Policy specifically CDER? And what are they doing if the lawyer went out on leave during that first year - i.e. sick leave/annual leave for maternity, followed by FMLA for the child? I mean not that anyone knows for sure what they'll too but I guess I'm asking does mat leave/FMLA affect the probationary time at all?
We’re in a different part of HHS and our boss has said that for the excepted service, which includes lawyers, the probationary period is 2 years.
I don’t know whether there are any special rules re counting maternity leave or FMLA for purposes of the probationary period. But I have researched this and spoke to HR about how leave without pay affects the computation of your years of service for pension calculations. The answer there is that you can take up to 6 months in any calendar year without it affecting the calculation. Annual leave and sick leave count the same as being in the office for the years of service number.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My SF-50 says “conditional,” but I have been in a permanent job for nearly five years. I know that my first year was probationary, but I didn’t think it went beyond that.
You might want to have your HR update your SF-50. A while back my agency was doing an audit and realized that people had finished their probationary periods but they never updated the SF-50 to show it and they fixed it as soon as it was caught. In these times, I suggest bringing it up to someone
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My SF-50 says “conditional,” but I have been in a permanent job for nearly five years. I know that my first year was probationary, but I didn’t think it went beyond that.
You might want to have your HR update your SF-50. A while back my agency was doing an audit and realized that people had finished their probationary periods but they never updated the SF-50 to show it and they fixed it as soon as it was caught. In these times, I suggest bringing it up to someone
Agreed. Though conditional is not the same as probationary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My SF-50 says “conditional,” but I have been in a permanent job for nearly five years. I know that my first year was probationary, but I didn’t think it went beyond that.
You might want to have your HR update your SF-50. A while back my agency was doing an audit and realized that people had finished their probationary periods but they never updated the SF-50 to show it and they fixed it as soon as it was caught. In these times, I suggest bringing it up to someone
Anonymous wrote:My SF-50 says “conditional,” but I have been in a permanent job for nearly five years. I know that my first year was probationary, but I didn’t think it went beyond that.