Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because she is a POC women and Americans won’t vote for that - no matter how much more qualified they are than the alternated facts DEI candidate that was elected

I love Winsome Sears and want to see her move up in national politics, but I didn’t vote for a sort of blackish / indianish woman because I hate POCs? Got it. Keep doubling down on that mentality PLEASE.

It will be interesting to see next year if Democrats will be racist and sexist and vote against Winsome Sears.

We already established you vote on policies, not DEI. Why is ok for maga to reject a woman based on race and gender and with the same breath expect Democrats to vote for someone against our policies? It is unbelievable how you want to get us in ' heads I win, tails you lose'

I will vote Democrat over any Republican. It does not matter if they are black, woman, gay or straight or male.

Why do you have rules for us that are different than yours?

DP. Wow, the PP's post went right over your head, didn't it? They were being sarcastic. The entire point is that of course Democrats would never vote for a Republican (even a black woman) - but they would also never consider that "sexism or racism." OTOH, when Republicans (obviously) don't vote for a Democrat (woman, POC, etc), that's all you people do - accuse us of "sexism and/or racism" when the reality is, we weren't about to vote for a Democrat. Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton - they didn't win because they are Democrats. Not because of their race or gender.

So, to recap: no one "rejected Harris based on her race and gender." You can insist otherwise until you're blue in the face, but you just look stupid.

And I will vote Republican over any Democrat. It does not matter if they are black, woman, gay or straight, or male. Get it?

Republicans are always going to vote Republican. Democrats are always going to vote Democrats. But presidential elections are decided by people who cross party lines.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because she is a POC women and Americans won’t vote for that - no matter how much more qualified they are than the alternated facts DEI candidate that was elected

I love Winsome Sears and want to see her move up in national politics, but I didn’t vote for a sort of blackish / indianish woman because I hate POCs? Got it. Keep doubling down on that mentality PLEASE.

It will be interesting to see next year if Democrats will be racist and sexist and vote against Winsome Sears.

We already established you vote on policies, not DEI. Why is ok for maga to reject a woman based on race and gender and with the same breath expect Democrats to vote for someone against our policies? It is unbelievable how you want to get us in ' heads I win, tails you lose'

I will vote Democrat over any Republican. It does not matter if they are black, woman, gay or straight or male.

Why do you have rules for us that are different than yours?

DP. Wow, the PP's post went right over your head, didn't it? They were being sarcastic. The entire point is that of course Democrats would never vote for a Republican (even a black woman) - but they would also never consider that "sexism or racism." OTOH, when Republicans (obviously) don't vote for a Democrat (woman, POC, etc), that's all you people do - accuse us of "sexism and/or racism" when the reality is, we weren't about to vote for a Democrat. Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton - they didn't win because they are Democrats. Not because of their race or gender.

So, to recap: no one "rejected Harris based on her race and gender." You can insist otherwise until you're blue in the face, but you just look stupid.

And I will vote Republican over any Democrat. It does not matter if they are black, woman, gay or straight, or male. Get it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because she is a POC women and Americans won’t vote for that - no matter how much more qualified they are than the alternated facts DEI candidate that was elected

I love Winsome Sears and want to see her move up in national politics, but I didn’t vote for a sort of blackish / indianish woman because I hate POCs? Got it. Keep doubling down on that mentality PLEASE.

The day the DNC can find a WOC like Kemi Badenoch, she will win the election. No more rewards for SAHMs whose husband cheated on them or as a sop to the BLM or any "interest" group.

Who is the SAHM whose husband cheated on her who run for president?

Hillary Rodham Clinton. After law school she worked a few years until Bill became governor of Arkansas and she was given a law firm job as a political favor. She was a SAHM in DC and only became a political force after Bill was finally caught.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t.

Too many idiots listened to RWNJ propaganda.

But the Democrats are fully pushing this narrative that she was a terrible candidate.

“Democrats”?

People trying to get clicks/likes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t.

Too many idiots listened to RWNJ propaganda.

But the Democrats are fully pushing this narrative that she was a terrible candidate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because she is a POC women and Americans won’t vote for that - no matter how much more qualified they are than the alternated facts DEI candidate that was elected

I love Winsome Sears and want to see her move up in national politics, but I didn’t vote for a sort of blackish / indianish woman because I hate POCs? Got it. Keep doubling down on that mentality PLEASE.

It will be interesting to see next year if Democrats will be racist and sexist and vote against Winsome Sears.

"tHaT's dIfFeReNt!!"

We both vote for our policies but if Putin was running as a Democrat I would vote Republican to save our country. That's the difference. How many Republicans came out against him? Even his generals and former vp. That is unheard of.

But you sold us down the river...congrats

You can't actually be equating Trump with... Putin. But sadly, I know you are. That's how far gone some of you are.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because she is a POC women and Americans won’t vote for that - no matter how much more qualified they are than the alternated facts DEI candidate that was elected

I love Winsome Sears and want to see her move up in national politics, but I didn’t vote for a sort of blackish / indianish woman because I hate POCs? Got it. Keep doubling down on that mentality PLEASE.

It will be interesting to see next year if Democrats will be racist and sexist and vote against Winsome Sears.

"tHaT's dIfFeReNt!!"

We both vote for our policies but if Putin was running as a Democrat I would vote Republican to save our country. That's the difference. How many Republicans came out against him? Even his generals and former vp. That is unheard of.

But you sold us down the river...congrats

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t.

Too many idiots listened to RWNJ propaganda.

But the Democrats are fully pushing this narrative that she was a terrible candidate.

A CNN commentator called her a “true double threat” because she could not effectively answer questions thinking on her feet nor did she prepare for expected questions.

She had a great debate, but then “nothing comes to mind” ended her campaign.

But are there any clips of her fumbling a question? I've never seen any, unless you count her answer to the "What would you have done differently?" question on The View, which I think was a very understable response.

She was asked that question repeatedly and didn’t have even a canned response.

Her CNN town hall was just terrible.

How was it terrible? I saw it and thought it was fine.
I think the fact that Trump wouldn't even show up looked far worse.

That’s great. But your opinion wasn’t shared by the American electorate.

How do you know it wasn't?

She lost the popular vote to Trump. Clearly many people did not get the impression she was qualified for the job.

She was qualified for the job. She and Hillary don’t have the charisma that the men have that have been winning. There’s just more hate than common sense in this country right now.

Amazing how blind some democrats are. Hillary was awful. She would have never been there if she wasn’t married to bill. Harris was awful. No original thoughts. Wanted to expand immigration. Never had children. Was half Indian which is the most racist culture in the US. Just politically all wrong

The fact that she doesn't have children should not be a factor. Women don't need to be mothers to succeed

I think many people take the view that people who don’t have children don’t have a vested interest in the future. They have no descendants. It ends with them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I voted for Trump and I watched her concession speech on that Wednesday. I think it was the best speech I’ve ever seen her give. She was relaxed, she looked….happy?……… She sounded confident and assured. If the Kamala Harris that gave THAT speech would’ve been the Kamala Harris on the campaign trail, I really think she might’ve pulled it off.

She hid her best self during the campaign, presumably following the advice of campaign managers and consultants. She should’ve just been herself instead.

Please. Spare us. There is no way you would vote for vice president Harris.

I didn’t imply anywhere in my post that I would’ve changed my vote to her. I’m a Trump supporter, period. I NEVER said she would’ve changed my mind. I was voting for Trump, for reasons that had absolutely nothing to do with her. I didn’t vote against Kamala - I voted for Trump.

What I said was that I thought she might’ve swayed enough uncommitted/undecided voters if she’d been more like the Kamala giving the concession speech than the Kamala of the campaign.

Your lack of reading comprehension is the problem here.

Why do you keep calling vice president Harris 'Kamala' and not Trump 'Donald'? Also, the election is over why are you harping on the past?

Why do you call him “Trump” instead of “President Trump”?

You answer my question first. Everyone here calls him 'Trump' I am going to continue calling him donald, little donnie and dear leader.

I will never call him President and there is nothing you can do to make me.

Doesn’t make him any less your president. Again.

Nope. I refuse.