Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s two parts?
Yes, the movie covers only Act I of the musical, even though it's as long as the whole musical. You have to wait a year to see Act II.
What a terrible idea.
It’s just such an obvious cash grab that it instantly turns me off from the film.
So movies shouldn't make money?
Did I say that? Why don’t you take that stick out of your ass. They do it so one movie makes twice as much money. It’s cynical and stupid and bloats the whole production.
It’s not done to make the best movie possible.
I shouldn't be surprised but, I think your comment is so over the top angry over nothing.
I am going to wish you a happy Thanksgiving in spite of your crudeness.
I’ll tell you what it is. It’s challenging an observation that is absolutely accurate (that the whole two part movie release thing is a complete cash grab) and with something that was completely NOT said or even implied. Of course no one makes movies for free. People here cannot for five seconds resist trying to start a stupid debate and it gets old really fast.
You shouldn’t be surprised at all when its treated with disgust.