Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Focusing on the important issues!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/22/trump-jack-smith-prosecutors-firing-justice-department-investigation/

Even though they’ve lost every election fraud court case, I’m sure they’ll find some fraud with Trump’s folks leading investigations. Also, a good use of tax dollars.

Bondi will be all over this, she was at Four Seasons Total Landscaping with Rudy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the qualifications for DOJ nominee need to be:
NOT from Florida
NOT having ever representing Trump in a legal matter. Isn't that as blatant a conflict of interest as it could possibly be? Not only that, it was in one of his impeachment trials (although of course she didn't have to actually do anything.)
NOT have skeletons pertaining to dogs or sex.
NOT have a law degree from the school ranked 98th.

No, that’s just a list of cheap attacks at Pam Bondi. Can you give the name of one Republican you would support or at least tolerate for AG? If not, that puts your attacks on Bondi in context.

Crickets

I knew you couldn’t provide a name. You would lob silly attacks at whomever Trump appoints.

We know, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that whomever trump nominates for any position in his cabinet that their loyalty is to trump not to the Constitution of the United States of America. We know that he is not using the FBI to vet his choices which screams there must be a lot to hide in his appointees this far.

"First rate people surround themselves with first rate people. Second rate people surround themselves with third rate people.". (Leo Rosen) Trump proves this by his choices.

You are incredibly misguided. I won't frustrate us both by debating you, but I will just say that I am so happy that your view of President Trump was so strongly rejected by the American people.

The final count according to The Nation. Trump won but did not get 50%. He received 49.94 and Harris received 48.26. he won by 1.68 percent and this, poor deluded one, is not a mandate.

https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/donald-trump-vote-margin-narrowed/

Anonymous wrote:WAPO: Trump to gut DOJ of everyone who worked on cases against him

So much winning!!

It doesn't get better. I'm going to get tired of winning!

Hope he goes after all his enemies and bankrupts them with the full litigious force of the U.S. government. You abuse the gov powers, fear having it turned right back on you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m starting to regret my Trump vote.

I was promised - PROMISED! - there would be misogyny. What am I getting instead? Women getting nominated all over the damn place!!! DHS, COS, SG, and now AG!

Where is the misogyny I was assured would happen? Y’all said it would be like “Handmaid’s Tale”! But this is turning out more like “Barbie’s World”!

Y’all LIED!!!!!

I think I'm gonna be waiting a long time for him to send people to gas chambers like Hitler. Whaddya think?

Anonymous wrote:Focusing on the important issues!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/11/22/trump-jack-smith-prosecutors-firing-justice-department-investigation/

Even though they’ve lost every election fraud court case, I’m sure they’ll find some fraud with Trump’s folks leading investigations. Also, a good use of tax dollars.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WAPO: Trump to gut DOJ of everyone who worked on cases against him

So much winning!!

It doesn't get better. I'm going to get tired of winning!

Hope he goes after all his enemies and bankrupts them with the full litigious force of the U.S. government. You abuse the gov powers, fear having it turned right back on you.

They weren't going after.him for political reasons??

Anonymous wrote:WAPO: Trump to gut DOJ of everyone who worked on cases against him

So much winning!!

It doesn't get better. I'm going to get tired of winning!

Hope he goes after all his enemies and bankrupts them with the full litigious force of the U.S. government. You abuse the gov powers, fear having it turned right back on you.

Anonymous wrote:I’m starting to regret my Trump vote.

I was promised - PROMISED! - there would be misogyny. What am I getting instead? Women getting nominated all over the damn place!!! DHS, COS, SG, and now AG!

Where is the misogyny I was assured would happen? Y’all said it would be like “Handmaid’s Tale”! But this is turning out more like “Barbie’s World”!

Y’all LIED!!!!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m starting to regret my Trump vote.

I was promised - PROMISED! - there would be misogyny. What am I getting instead? Women getting nominated all over the damn place!!! DHS, COS, SG, and now AG!

Where is the misogyny I was assured would happen? Y’all said it would be like “Handmaid’s Tale”! But this is turning out more like “Barbie’s World”!

Y’all LIED!!!!!

In Barbie’s world they beat the patriarchy. These women will screw over women so they can have little p power. The paternalism is the point. Trump bribed her, so she caved. The others kissed the ring. These are not strong, independent thinkers with novel ideas. They’re toeing a party line.

You BETTER be right. And there better not be anymore women nominees, for the sake of your remaining shreds of credibility.

Add we better start seeing some concrete evidence of misogyny rolled out in the first hundred days. At the very minimum a ban on women voting, driving and wearing shoes while in the kitchen. Just like you assured us would happen.

Clock will be ticking soon.

Look we know that we have upside down world right now, with Trumpsters saying they are the feminists, but the GOP has a woman problem. Where are they? You can Google it. You also can’t claim “I have a daughter, so I can’t be sexist.” Or, “I have a black friend, so can’t be racist.”

Also, I didn’t say they’d be rolling out the misogyny. I said they would be upholding the patriarchy, which they are doing by virtue of accepting these positions. They will help white men billionaires screw over the taxpayers. You might also ask yourself why these women aren’t billionaires themselves? 🤔

You may have said patriarchy - but women were wearing handsmaid costumes to vote. Speaking of patriarchy - you must support Nancy Mace. Me too!

Why does Nancy Mace want bearded transmen who were born biologically female in womens bathrooms?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m starting to regret my Trump vote.

I was promised - PROMISED! - there would be misogyny. What am I getting instead? Women getting nominated all over the damn place!!! DHS, COS, SG, and now AG!

Where is the misogyny I was assured would happen? Y’all said it would be like “Handmaid’s Tale”! But this is turning out more like “Barbie’s World”!

Y’all LIED!!!!!

In Barbie’s world they beat the patriarchy. These women will screw over women so they can have little p power. The paternalism is the point. Trump bribed her, so she caved. The others kissed the ring. These are not strong, independent thinkers with novel ideas. They’re toeing a party line.

You BETTER be right. And there better not be anymore women nominees, for the sake of your remaining shreds of credibility.

Add we better start seeing some concrete evidence of misogyny rolled out in the first hundred days. At the very minimum a ban on women voting, driving and wearing shoes while in the kitchen. Just like you assured us would happen.

Clock will be ticking soon.

Look we know that we have upside down world right now, with Trumpsters saying they are the feminists, but the GOP has a woman problem. Where are they? You can Google it. You also can’t claim “I have a daughter, so I can’t be sexist.” Or, “I have a black friend, so can’t be racist.”

Also, I didn’t say they’d be rolling out the misogyny. I said they would be upholding the patriarchy, which they are doing by virtue of accepting these positions. They will help white men billionaires screw over the taxpayers. You might also ask yourself why these women aren’t billionaires themselves? 🤔

You may have said patriarchy - but women were wearing handsmaid costumes to vote. Speaking of patriarchy - you must support Nancy Mace. Me too!

Anonymous wrote:I’m starting to regret my Trump vote.

I was promised - PROMISED! - there would be misogyny. What am I getting instead? Women getting nominated all over the damn place!!! DHS, COS, SG, and now AG!

Where is the misogyny I was assured would happen? Y’all said it would be like “Handmaid’s Tale”! But this is turning out more like “Barbie’s World”!

Y’all LIED!!!!!