Anonymous wrote:Taylor should get rid of Sullivan before they have a Fairfax county level scandal on their hands.
Parents want to see the return of trust and morality in mcps

Anonymous wrote:Taylor should get rid of Sullivan before they have a Fairfax county level scandal on their hands.
Parents want to see the return of trust and morality in mcps

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some info about these chief positions, including that Taylor will share more about his vision on Dec. 5th.

https://moco360.media/2024/11/26/mcps-to-reshape-leadership-structure/

I am wondering how these executive-level positions are the same number as McKnight had.

I am not a big fan of making people reapply for their jobs. If someone isn't doing what you want, show that person the door. Otherwise, making a team of people fear for their jobs by having to reapply for the jobs weakens the moral of the team as well as that of the overall organization. What a dumb move. I'm beginning to wonder whether Taylor is up to the job.

Agreed. Either get rid of the ones you don’t want or just keep them and change their roles and responsibilities.

+100. FAANG companies do this and it has the exact effect you speak of. Sure people who are retained move past it enough to keep working but it is certainly a contributing factor in turnover and burnout.

FAANG fires people. They allow you to apply for other jobs but they don't change your job. They are firing managers right now and laying off via the RTO.

"Firing" is an ambiguous term and is best avoided.

”Layoffs” are different from "firing for cause".

Amazon loves firing constantly. Others do layoffs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some info about these chief positions, including that Taylor will share more about his vision on Dec. 5th.

https://moco360.media/2024/11/26/mcps-to-reshape-leadership-structure/

I am wondering how these executive-level positions are the same number as McKnight had.

I am not a big fan of making people reapply for their jobs. If someone isn't doing what you want, show that person the door. Otherwise, making a team of people fear for their jobs by having to reapply for the jobs weakens the moral of the team as well as that of the overall organization. What a dumb move. I'm beginning to wonder whether Taylor is up to the job.

Agreed. Either get rid of the ones you don’t want or just keep them and change their roles and responsibilities.

+100. FAANG companies do this and it has the exact effect you speak of. Sure people who are retained move past it enough to keep working but it is certainly a contributing factor in turnover and burnout.

FAANG fires people. They allow you to apply for other jobs but they don't change your job. They are firing managers right now and laying off via the RTO.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some info about these chief positions, including that Taylor will share more about his vision on Dec. 5th.

https://moco360.media/2024/11/26/mcps-to-reshape-leadership-structure/

I am wondering how these executive-level positions are the same number as McKnight had.

I am not a big fan of making people reapply for their jobs. If someone isn't doing what you want, show that person the door. Otherwise, making a team of people fear for their jobs by having to reapply for the jobs weakens the moral of the team as well as that of the overall organization. What a dumb move. I'm beginning to wonder whether Taylor is up to the job.

Agreed. Either get rid of the ones you don’t want or just keep them and change their roles and responsibilities.

+100. FAANG companies do this and it has the exact effect you speak of. Sure people who are retained move past it enough to keep working but it is certainly a contributing factor in turnover and burnout.