Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School year increases participation at the youngest ages, which increases the quantity and quality of players later. School year also eliminates trapped players in the MS/HS and HS/college transitions. It was a shortsighted switch to BY and it should be corrected. It will be a headache to correct, but it will be good for players (trapped players) and good for the system in the long run.
No it is not an issue. It is not worth the effort for few the “trapped” players. Go play rec.
Why are there so few trapped players? Oh, because they all drop out and stop playing.....
And there will still be trapped players with SY.
Since you are so knowledgeable please list all the school districts that begin the school year before 8/1.
My son is an August birthday in a state where the enrollment cutoff is September 1st. He'll go from playing with his grade level to playing with the class behind him who he has no connection to.
Same here. Its so odd to me that this seems like the better solution. It just leaves a different set of kids trapped.
Nobody is trapped if they can play with their grade. Right now Fall birthday kids are not allowed to play with their correct grade so they’re trapped. With the change nobody will be trapped.
Except the school districts that start Sept 1 or any date after Aug 1. Oh and home school. and private school kids.
But don't let detailed get in the way.
There may still be some trapped players but it will be reduced by a lot. Going from 4 months worth of trapped players to 1 month or less is a significant improvement. No solution is perfect but can we at least agree that having less trapped players is a good thing?
According to https://nces.ed.gov/programs/statereform/tab5_3.asp the only trapped players under a return to 8/1 cutoff would be redshirted kids. There will be some kids who are misaligned on the non-trapped side of the cutoff, requiring them to play up to stay with class, but even that group will be far less than the current trapped kids. If this changes, I'd expect leagues to recommend to clubs that they play kids up whenever possible to stay with class. The tough decision will be for clubs/parents when a kid can only make the B team with class but can make the A team below class.
Nobody is trapped if they can play with their grade. Right now Fall birthday kids are not allowed to play with their correct grade so they’re trapped. With the change nobody will be trapped.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:my DD is born in June 2010 plays u15 but is a 8th grader not a 9th grader (started school late in K) yet. with this new rule can she try out to u15 again next year which means changing teams?
June B days will not be affected. And she will need to remain with the 9th graders.
doesn't that eventually create a problem for kids like that? redshirted kids I guess? her team will graduate a year younger from HS (and maybe go play college) before the June 2010 kid graduates from HS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:my DD is born in June 2010 plays u15 but is a 8th grader not a 9th grader (started school late in K) yet. with this new rule can she try out to u15 again next year which means changing teams?
June B days will not be affected. And she will need to remain with the 9th graders.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School year increases participation at the youngest ages, which increases the quantity and quality of players later. School year also eliminates trapped players in the MS/HS and HS/college transitions. It was a shortsighted switch to BY and it should be corrected. It will be a headache to correct, but it will be good for players (trapped players) and good for the system in the long run.
No it is not an issue. It is not worth the effort for few the “trapped” players. Go play rec.
Why are there so few trapped players? Oh, because they all drop out and stop playing.....
And there will still be trapped players with SY.
Since you are so knowledgeable please list all the school districts that begin the school year before 8/1.
My son is an August birthday in a state where the enrollment cutoff is September 1st. He'll go from playing with his grade level to playing with the class behind him who he has no connection to.
Same here. Its so odd to me that this seems like the better solution. It just leaves a different set of kids trapped.
Nobody is trapped if they can play with their grade. Right now Fall birthday kids are not allowed to play with their correct grade so they’re trapped. With the change nobody will be trapped.
Except the school districts that start Sept 1 or any date after Aug 1. Oh and home school. and private school kids.
But don't let detailed get in the way.
Redshirted and home school kids aren’t trapped if they’re in the wrong grade by choice. Fall birthday kids are trapped by being in their correct grade for school but a different grade for soccer. Get it now?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School year increases participation at the youngest ages, which increases the quantity and quality of players later. School year also eliminates trapped players in the MS/HS and HS/college transitions. It was a shortsighted switch to BY and it should be corrected. It will be a headache to correct, but it will be good for players (trapped players) and good for the system in the long run.
No it is not an issue. It is not worth the effort for few the “trapped” players. Go play rec.
Why are there so few trapped players? Oh, because they all drop out and stop playing.....
And there will still be trapped players with SY.
Since you are so knowledgeable please list all the school districts that begin the school year before 8/1.
My son is an August birthday in a state where the enrollment cutoff is September 1st. He'll go from playing with his grade level to playing with the class behind him who he has no connection to.
Same here. Its so odd to me that this seems like the better solution. It just leaves a different set of kids trapped.
Nobody is trapped if they can play with their grade. Right now Fall birthday kids are not allowed to play with their correct grade so they’re trapped. With the change nobody will be trapped.
Except the school districts that start Sept 1 or any date after Aug 1. Oh and home school. and private school kids.
But don't let detailed get in the way.
There may still be some trapped players but it will be reduced by a lot. Going from 4 months worth of trapped players to 1 month or less is a significant improvement. No solution is perfect but can we at least agree that having less trapped players is a good thing?
No, because I don't think trapped players are an issue. Especially on higher level competitive teams.
If you want to play SY rec with friends from school fine.
You must be REALLY afraid of some fall birthday soccer kids in your kid’s grade to be this opposed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School year increases participation at the youngest ages, which increases the quantity and quality of players later. School year also eliminates trapped players in the MS/HS and HS/college transitions. It was a shortsighted switch to BY and it should be corrected. It will be a headache to correct, but it will be good for players (trapped players) and good for the system in the long run.
No it is not an issue. It is not worth the effort for few the “trapped” players. Go play rec.
Why are there so few trapped players? Oh, because they all drop out and stop playing.....
And there will still be trapped players with SY.
Since you are so knowledgeable please list all the school districts that begin the school year before 8/1.
My son is an August birthday in a state where the enrollment cutoff is September 1st. He'll go from playing with his grade level to playing with the class behind him who he has no connection to.
Same here. Its so odd to me that this seems like the better solution. It just leaves a different set of kids trapped.
Nobody is trapped if they can play with their grade. Right now Fall birthday kids are not allowed to play with their correct grade so they’re trapped. With the change nobody will be trapped.
Except the school districts that start Sept 1 or any date after Aug 1. Oh and home school. and private school kids.
But don't let detailed get in the way.
There may still be some trapped players but it will be reduced by a lot. Going from 4 months worth of trapped players to 1 month or less is a significant improvement. No solution is perfect but can we at least agree that having less trapped players is a good thing?
According to https://nces.ed.gov/programs/statereform/tab5_3.asp the only trapped players under a return to 8/1 cutoff would be redshirted kids. There will be some kids who are misaligned on the non-trapped side of the cutoff, requiring them to play up to stay with class, but even that group will be far less than the current trapped kids. If this changes, I'd expect leagues to recommend to clubs that they play kids up whenever possible to stay with class. The tough decision will be for clubs/parents when a kid can only make the B team with class but can make the A team below class.
Nobody is trapped if they can play with their grade. Right now Fall birthday kids are not allowed to play with their correct grade so they’re trapped. With the change nobody will be trapped.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School year increases participation at the youngest ages, which increases the quantity and quality of players later. School year also eliminates trapped players in the MS/HS and HS/college transitions. It was a shortsighted switch to BY and it should be corrected. It will be a headache to correct, but it will be good for players (trapped players) and good for the system in the long run.
No it is not an issue. It is not worth the effort for few the “trapped” players. Go play rec.
Why are there so few trapped players? Oh, because they all drop out and stop playing.....
And there will still be trapped players with SY.
Since you are so knowledgeable please list all the school districts that begin the school year before 8/1.
My son is an August birthday in a state where the enrollment cutoff is September 1st. He'll go from playing with his grade level to playing with the class behind him who he has no connection to.
Same here. Its so odd to me that this seems like the better solution. It just leaves a different set of kids trapped.
Nobody is trapped if they can play with their grade. Right now Fall birthday kids are not allowed to play with their correct grade so they’re trapped. With the change nobody will be trapped.
Except the school districts that start Sept 1 or any date after Aug 1. Oh and home school. and private school kids.
But don't let detailed get in the way.
There may still be some trapped players but it will be reduced by a lot. Going from 4 months worth of trapped players to 1 month or less is a significant improvement. No solution is perfect but can we at least agree that having less trapped players is a good thing?
No, because I don't think trapped players are an issue. Especially on higher level competitive teams.
If you want to play SY rec with friends from school fine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School year increases participation at the youngest ages, which increases the quantity and quality of players later. School year also eliminates trapped players in the MS/HS and HS/college transitions. It was a shortsighted switch to BY and it should be corrected. It will be a headache to correct, but it will be good for players (trapped players) and good for the system in the long run.
No it is not an issue. It is not worth the effort for few the “trapped” players. Go play rec.
Why are there so few trapped players? Oh, because they all drop out and stop playing.....
And there will still be trapped players with SY.
Since you are so knowledgeable please list all the school districts that begin the school year before 8/1.
My son is an August birthday in a state where the enrollment cutoff is September 1st. He'll go from playing with his grade level to playing with the class behind him who he has no connection to.
Same here. Its so odd to me that this seems like the better solution. It just leaves a different set of kids trapped.
Nobody is trapped if they can play with their grade. Right now Fall birthday kids are not allowed to play with their correct grade so they’re trapped. With the change nobody will be trapped.
Except the school districts that start Sept 1 or any date after Aug 1. Oh and home school. and private school kids.
But don't let detailed get in the way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School year increases participation at the youngest ages, which increases the quantity and quality of players later. School year also eliminates trapped players in the MS/HS and HS/college transitions. It was a shortsighted switch to BY and it should be corrected. It will be a headache to correct, but it will be good for players (trapped players) and good for the system in the long run.
No it is not an issue. It is not worth the effort for few the “trapped” players. Go play rec.
Why are there so few trapped players? Oh, because they all drop out and stop playing.....
And there will still be trapped players with SY.
Since you are so knowledgeable please list all the school districts that begin the school year before 8/1.
My son is an August birthday in a state where the enrollment cutoff is September 1st. He'll go from playing with his grade level to playing with the class behind him who he has no connection to.
Same here. Its so odd to me that this seems like the better solution. It just leaves a different set of kids trapped.
Nobody is trapped if they can play with their grade. Right now Fall birthday kids are not allowed to play with their correct grade so they’re trapped. With the change nobody will be trapped.
Except the school districts that start Sept 1 or any date after Aug 1. Oh and home school. and private school kids.
But don't let detailed get in the way.
There may still be some trapped players but it will be reduced by a lot. Going from 4 months worth of trapped players to 1 month or less is a significant improvement. No solution is perfect but can we at least agree that having less trapped players is a good thing?
According to https://nces.ed.gov/programs/statereform/tab5_3.asp the only trapped players under a return to 8/1 cutoff would be redshirted kids. There will be some kids who are misaligned on the non-trapped side of the cutoff, requiring them to play up to stay with class, but even that group will be far less than the current trapped kids. If this changes, I'd expect leagues to recommend to clubs that they play kids up whenever possible to stay with class. The tough decision will be for clubs/parents when a kid can only make the B team with class but can make the A team below class.
Nobody is trapped if they can play with their grade. Right now Fall birthday kids are not allowed to play with their correct grade so they’re trapped. With the change nobody will be trapped.
Anonymous wrote:my DD is born in June 2010 plays u15 but is a 8th grader not a 9th grader (started school late in K) yet. with this new rule can she try out to u15 again next year which means changing teams?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School year increases participation at the youngest ages, which increases the quantity and quality of players later. School year also eliminates trapped players in the MS/HS and HS/college transitions. It was a shortsighted switch to BY and it should be corrected. It will be a headache to correct, but it will be good for players (trapped players) and good for the system in the long run.
No it is not an issue. It is not worth the effort for few the “trapped” players. Go play rec.
Why are there so few trapped players? Oh, because they all drop out and stop playing.....
And there will still be trapped players with SY.
Since you are so knowledgeable please list all the school districts that begin the school year before 8/1.
My son is an August birthday in a state where the enrollment cutoff is September 1st. He'll go from playing with his grade level to playing with the class behind him who he has no connection to.
Same here. Its so odd to me that this seems like the better solution. It just leaves a different set of kids trapped.
Nobody is trapped if they can play with their grade. Right now Fall birthday kids are not allowed to play with their correct grade so they’re trapped. With the change nobody will be trapped.
Except the school districts that start Sept 1 or any date after Aug 1. Oh and home school. and private school kids.
But don't let detailed get in the way.
There may still be some trapped players but it will be reduced by a lot. Going from 4 months worth of trapped players to 1 month or less is a significant improvement. No solution is perfect but can we at least agree that having less trapped players is a good thing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School year increases participation at the youngest ages, which increases the quantity and quality of players later. School year also eliminates trapped players in the MS/HS and HS/college transitions. It was a shortsighted switch to BY and it should be corrected. It will be a headache to correct, but it will be good for players (trapped players) and good for the system in the long run.
No it is not an issue. It is not worth the effort for few the “trapped” players. Go play rec.
Why are there so few trapped players? Oh, because they all drop out and stop playing.....
And there will still be trapped players with SY.
Since you are so knowledgeable please list all the school districts that begin the school year before 8/1.
My son is an August birthday in a state where the enrollment cutoff is September 1st. He'll go from playing with his grade level to playing with the class behind him who he has no connection to.
Same here. Its so odd to me that this seems like the better solution. It just leaves a different set of kids trapped.
According to https://nces.ed.gov/programs/statereform/tab5_3.asp the only trapped players under a return to 8/1 cutoff would be redshirted kids. There will be some kids who are misaligned on the non-trapped side of the cutoff, requiring them to play up to stay with class, but even that group will be far less than the current trapped kids. If this changes, I'd expect leagues to recommend to clubs that they play kids up whenever possible to stay with class. The tough decision will be for clubs/parents when a kid can only make the B team with class but can make the A team below class.
Nobody is trapped if they can play with their grade. Right now Fall birthday kids are not allowed to play with their correct grade so they’re trapped. With the change nobody will be trapped.
Except the school districts that start Sept 1 or any date after Aug 1. Oh and home school. and private school kids.
But don't let detailed get in the way.
There may still be some trapped players but it will be reduced by a lot. Going from 4 months worth of trapped players to 1 month or less is a significant improvement. No solution is perfect but can we at least agree that having less trapped players is a good thing?