Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The interview was fine, but they edited it really awkwardly and at other times, did voice over rather than play her response. I guess I found it frustrating because of the producers, not Harris.

They will never allow an unedited interview or a non-scripted speech from her. Never.
It would shock most people to really hear her speak without help.

"they?"

You think 60 Minutes left editorial to the campaign?

The MAGA trolls are getting desperate. The narrative that Harris won’t speak to voters or do interviews has collapsed. Harris is doing well. And she’s for sure a lot tougher than Trump who would disintegrate with a tenth of the picayune criticism that Harris has received.

She crushed it in the three appearances I saw this week.

As opposed to deranged incoherent Trump who refused to go on 60 Minutes and demanded an apology from 60 Minutes over his horrible interview with Leslie Stahl where he stormed off the set - and the reason he cited for wanting an apology was that he claimed Stahl said the Hunter laptop came from Russia - which Stahl never even said.

Actually he said there was spying on his campaign, and she said that CBS couldn't allow misinformation to be stated on the air.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The interview was fine, but they edited it really awkwardly and at other times, did voice over rather than play her response. I guess I found it frustrating because of the producers, not Harris.

They will never allow an unedited interview or a non-scripted speech from her. Never.
It would shock most people to really hear her speak without help.

"they?"

You think 60 Minutes left editorial to the campaign?

The MAGA trolls are getting desperate. The narrative that Harris won’t speak to voters or do interviews has collapsed. Harris is doing well. And she’s for sure a lot tougher than Trump who would disintegrate with a tenth of the picayune criticism that Harris has received.

She crushed it in the three appearances I saw this week.

As opposed to deranged incoherent Trump who refused to go on 60 Minutes and demanded an apology from 60 Minutes over his horrible interview with Leslie Stahl where he stormed off the set - and the reason he cited for wanting an apology was that he claimed Stahl said the Hunter laptop came from Russia - which Stahl never even said.

First of all, this is about her on 60 Minutes. It's not about Trump.

Secondly, why is she spending on paragraphs of commentary stating the obvious?

"We are a diverse people". No kiddng,! Are you trying to run out the clock with word salad, obvious sound bites and platitudes? It's maddening.

She is going to have to tackle the most complicated subjects and decisions of anyone in the world and I'm not sure she can. She is shallow, rotates around social issues and does not have the depth of knowledge that many others would. You have to deal with international problems, trade, defense, economics and many other issues. After 4 years as VP, this is the best she can cobble together? I don't have the confidence she has the life experience to do it. It's disturbing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she's just awkward in certain public speaking events. And she lacks gravitas. I saw footage of her with Liz Cheney. Cheney has gravitas. The difference between the two was stark.

A) Liz Cheney is not running (remember? her party disavowed her) and B) Kamala Harris has more gravitas in her little finger than than her opponent does.

A) it was an event where Cheney was backing Harris. B) still no gravitas.

Anonymous wrote:I think she's just awkward in certain public speaking events. And she lacks gravitas. I saw footage of her with Liz Cheney. Cheney has gravitas. The difference between the two was stark.

A) Liz Cheney is not running (remember? her party disavowed her) and B) Kamala Harris has more gravitas in her little finger than than her opponent does.

I think she's just awkward in certain public speaking events. And she lacks gravitas. I saw footage of her with Liz Cheney. Cheney has gravitas. The difference between the two was stark.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I swear if it didn't hurt more people then it helped I would really advocate strongly for voter tests..... I truly believe that people need to have a very basic understanding of facts and what those facts mean before voting..... If you agree that these are non-disputed facts and you still want to vote Trump, then you go ahead and enjoy..... But this constant twisting and bending and saying up is down and down is right and left is blue and grass is purple and cows eat butter..... It just doesn't make sense and it's weird as hell

Prices have increased 20% and there have been over 10 million illegal border crossings since Biden-Harris took office. Those are the only two statistics that I need to know that this country is on a disastrous path. I’m voting for Trump on Election Day to change course from this administration’s disastrous policies. Harris said on the view she wouldn’t have done anything differently than Biden and that she was involved in all the major decisions his administration made. She’s not a change candidate. She’s status quo.

Can you detail Trumps plans on both topics?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No real answers on Israel. No real answers on Ukraine. What are her policies? What are we voting for?

Well, non pussy grabbers for starters. If that's not enough, then Trump's f-ed up economic plan (let's tax food to make it cheaper -- huh?!). If that's not still enough, how about to avoid a leader who has openly stated change is hoax when states can no longer keep up with environmental catastrophes.

nothing wrong grabbing a "woman" by the pussy, that wants to be grabbed by the pussy. You weren't there Karen.

*climate change, obvs

Anonymous wrote:No real answers on Israel. No real answers on Ukraine. What are her policies? What are we voting for?

Well, non pussy grabbers for starters. If that's not enough, then Trump's f-ed up economic plan (let's tax food to make it cheaper -- huh?!). If that's not still enough, how about to avoid a leader who has openly stated change is hoax when states can no longer keep up with environmental catastrophes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Because pointing to trump supporters and calling them “a basket of deplorables” worked out so well for Hilary.

Given the eugenics, racism, misogyny and xenophobia, it appears she was right.

It’s like you googled “things that Hitler believed in“ copied and pasted them here. Y’all are hilarious

eugenics

Misogyny is borne in the abortion policy of the right.
xenophobia is represented by the whole "they are eating our cats and dogs" trope.

Hiliarious, right?

DP. I think the eugenics is actually rooted in abortion and anti-migration. They want whites to populate with one another and to keep non-whites out of the US to avoid cross populating. Truly scary.

Whitaker is a tool, but I give him credit for exposing Tamala

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel many are looking for excuses to sit this one out because they don't want to vote for a woman, specifically a half brown-half black, half Hindu-half Christian woman who is married to a Jewish man.

Stop making this about race. Dems cannot keep on blaming voters for disliking their candidates if they actually want to win. Statements like this are exactly why this election is even close despite Trump being an absolutely terrible candidate by any standard. Most Americans vehemently dislike identity politics. Voters don’t want every policy discussion in the US to sound like a college course on intersectional racism and gender studies. Get a clue Democrats, people care about cost of living, crime, and illegal immigration. Talk about bread and butter issues. Avoid the social justice warrior language that alienates most voters.

If they were indeed picking him for better policies then it would make sense but he isn't offering better policies, only blaming democrats for bad policies.

Trump had better policies on the border. Letting millions flow in over the border for 3.5 years while claiming there was nothing you can do and then suddenly "finding" a solution to get numbers down at the border 6 months before the election is outrageous.

And KH said today on the View that nothing came to mind that she would’ve done differently than Biden. What?!?

Exactly. Believe her.

She said she wouldn't do anything different from biden that was it for me. I can't.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel many are looking for excuses to sit this one out because they don't want to vote for a woman, specifically a half brown-half black, half Hindu-half Christian woman who is married to a Jewish man.

Stop making this about race. Dems cannot keep on blaming voters for disliking their candidates if they actually want to win. Statements like this are exactly why this election is even close despite Trump being an absolutely terrible candidate by any standard. Most Americans vehemently dislike identity politics. Voters don’t want every policy discussion in the US to sound like a college course on intersectional racism and gender studies. Get a clue Democrats, people care about cost of living, crime, and illegal immigration. Talk about bread and butter issues. Avoid the social justice warrior language that alienates most voters.

If they were indeed picking him for better policies then it would make sense but he isn't offering better policies, only blaming democrats for bad policies.

Trump had better policies on the border. Letting millions flow in over the border for 3.5 years while claiming there was nothing you can do and then suddenly "finding" a solution to get numbers down at the border 6 months before the election is outrageous.

And KH said today on the View that nothing came to mind that she would’ve done differently than Biden. What?!?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The interview was fine, but they edited it really awkwardly and at other times, did voice over rather than play her response. I guess I found it frustrating because of the producers, not Harris.

They will never allow an unedited interview or a non-scripted speech from her. Never.
It would shock most people to really hear her speak without help.

"they?"

You think 60 Minutes left editorial to the campaign?

The MAGA trolls are getting desperate. The narrative that Harris won’t speak to voters or do interviews has collapsed. Harris is doing well. And she’s for sure a lot tougher than Trump who would disintegrate with a tenth of the picayune criticism that Harris has received.

She crushed it in the three appearances I saw this week.

As opposed to deranged incoherent Trump who refused to go on 60 Minutes and demanded an apology from 60 Minutes over his horrible interview with Leslie Stahl where he stormed off the set - and the reason he cited for wanting an apology was that he claimed Stahl said the Hunter laptop came from Russia - which Stahl never even said.