Anonymous wrote:That’s great! Dance is a wonderful profession for those who choose it. So is football and many other sports, whether as an athlete, coach or behind the scenes contributor. So I do wonder why dance is recognized as a legitimate course of athletic study and sports are not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My dancer will not be majoring in dance. Dance is an activity, not a future.
That’s easy to say when you have a mediocre dancer. Talented dancers have more options.
Cruise ships?
That’s one path. Other grads I know have been hired by professional companies including Mark Morris, Elizabeth Streb, Nederlands, Pilobolus, and Martha Graham Company. Some are running their own companies or studios. Others are teaching in private studios, or go on for MFAs and teach in universities as adjunct or tenured faculty members. A few have managed to balance high level careers while dancing in well regarded local companies part-time. It’s not an easy path and requires sacrifices, but dancers who are driven, disciplined, and talented can make it work. Those who have potential but can only see one path flame out and those who lack talent or drive give up. The others just keep working and evolving.
Mark Morris - gross fat slob
Elizabeth Streb - needs grants to survive
Nederlands - foreign company sustained by the state
Pilobolus - meh
Martha Graham - she's long been dead and the company pretty much died with her, even the Ford Foundation passed her up because they knew she wouldn't use their funding to create a lasting legacy
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What do dance majors do for work when they graduate?
Temp jobs as administrative assistant.
I had a roommate who was one. Lamented her dumb degree that wasn't paying her rent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even when opinions on it aren’t sought in the post, without fail, every single thread about the performing arts inevitably devolves into whether it’s a worthwhile degree (and warnings about waiting tables). So tiresome!
You are mistaking the criticism. I am not criticizing these young dancers. I am criticizing a system that spits out dancers without fall back plans and over eager parents close their eyes to it all. Maybe you are the exceptions. But there are dancer majors at institutions all over the country and their prospects aren’t terrific. I think dancers can be much better served, that’s my only point.
Anonymous wrote:Even when opinions on it aren’t sought in the post, without fail, every single thread about the performing arts inevitably devolves into whether it’s a worthwhile degree (and warnings about waiting tables). So tiresome!
mAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Applying as a dance major can be a great strategy for a great dancer with less than stellar stats. At many schools it's easy to change your major once you're there.
It's not a "great strategy' because "great dancers" get nothing out of colllege. They are too old. They should be in dance companies by then.
You’re showing your age and I hope you’re not in any position to advise dancers coming up now. This may have been true for ballet dancers 20 years ago, but even ballet companies these days are partnering with colleges to train their recruits and some companies have started their own undergrad programs to hone talent that won’t flame out early. In modern dance the options are even more plentiful.
So this explains why young ballet dancers who seek year round conservatories only to attend and never get picked up. If they are truly partnering with colleges, a lot of families should stop uprooting and separating their families for an empty and expensive dream.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My dancer will not be majoring in dance. Dance is an activity, not a future.
That’s easy to say when you have a mediocre dancer. Talented dancers have more options.
Cruise ships?
That’s one path. Other grads I know have been hired by professional companies including Mark Morris, Elizabeth Streb, Nederlands, Pilobolus, and Martha Graham Company. Some are running their own companies or studios. Others are teaching in private studios, or go on for MFAs and teach in universities as adjunct or tenured faculty members. A few have managed to balance high level careers while dancing in well regarded local companies part-time. It’s not an easy path and requires sacrifices, but dancers who are driven, disciplined, and talented can make it work. Those who have potential but can only see one path flame out and those who lack talent or drive give up. The others just keep working and evolving.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Applying as a dance major can be a great strategy for a great dancer with less than stellar stats. At many schools it's easy to change your major once you're there.
It's not a "great strategy' because "great dancers" get nothing out of colllege. They are too old. They should be in dance companies by then.
You’re showing your age and I hope you’re not in any position to advise dancers coming up now. This may have been true for ballet dancers 20 years ago, but even ballet companies these days are partnering with colleges to train their recruits and some companies have started their own undergrad programs to hone talent that won’t flame out early. In modern dance the options are even more plentiful.
Anonymous wrote:What do dance majors do for work when they graduate?
Anonymous wrote:Even when opinions on it aren’t sought in the post, without fail, every single thread about the performing arts inevitably devolves into whether it’s a worthwhile degree (and warnings about waiting tables). So tiresome!