Anonymous
08/21/2024 15:21
Subject: Killing the Purple Line is the prudent economic decision - despite billions spent
It’ll be wonderful and full to capacity if democrats allow rampant crime on it
Anonymous
08/21/2024 10:52
Subject: Killing the Purple Line is the prudent economic decision - despite billions spent
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:TLDR--when is the purple line actually going to be running?
They are now saying December 2027.
It's never going to be viable. What a waste. It will drain untold millions from good use in other areas.
Please explain what "be viable" means to you, in the context of the Purple Line.
Anonymous
08/21/2024 10:46
Subject: Killing the Purple Line is the prudent economic decision - despite billions spent
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I live on the alignment in DTSS and am psyched for the Purple Line. There is rail in the road outside my house!
Why does that appeal to you?
Because having reliable transportation options that don't require personal car ownership are awesome! Let me guess, you've also been whining and crying about Charles Allen and Brianne Nadeau on this board, too.
NP.
Allen crafted the plan to make fare-evasion legal on Metro.
Your “awesome!” metro is about to collapse financially thanks to the idiot crime-bro Charles Allen, who you voted for, PP.
Admit it: you voted for Allen.
Fare evasion costs Metro $40MM out of a $4.8BB budget, or approximately 0.8%. So no, fare evasion is a rounding error, not any significant reason for Metro's so-called "collapse."
Anonymous
08/19/2024 23:54
Subject: Killing the Purple Line is the prudent economic decision - despite billions spent
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Public transportation is a public good. It isn't supposed to be self-supporting
It’s never been close to self supporting. There are limits to the benefits of public goods.
yeah. just like roads and sidewalks and police.
its a public good duh.
Anonymous
08/19/2024 23:31
Subject: Killing the Purple Line is the prudent economic decision - despite billions spent
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:TLDR--when is the purple line actually going to be running?
They are now saying December 2027.
It's never going to be viable. What a waste. It will drain untold millions from good use in other areas.
Anonymous
08/19/2024 22:33
Subject: Killing the Purple Line is the prudent economic decision - despite billions spent
Anonymous wrote:TLDR--when is the purple line actually going to be running?
They are now saying December 2027.
Anonymous
08/19/2024 20:51
Subject: Re:Killing the Purple Line is the prudent economic decision - despite billions spent
Anonymous wrote:I have been driving around / through the construction for so many years. Just finish it already.
Kids will have gone completely through Sligo Elementary and Silver Spring International Middle without that purple line construction being completed. It's never ending.
Anonymous
08/19/2024 19:08
Subject: Killing the Purple Line is the prudent economic decision - despite billions spent
TLDR--when is the purple line actually going to be running?
Anonymous
08/19/2024 17:21
Subject: Killing the Purple Line is the prudent economic decision - despite billions spent
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I live on the alignment in DTSS and am psyched for the Purple Line. There is rail in the road outside my house!
Why does that appeal to you?
Because having reliable transportation options that don't require personal car ownership are awesome! Let me guess, you've also been whining and crying about Charles Allen and Brianne Nadeau on this board, too.
NP.
Allen crafted the plan to make fare-evasion legal on Metro.
Your “awesome!” metro is about to collapse financially thanks to the idiot crime-bro Charles Allen, who you voted for, PP.
Admit it: you voted for Allen.
DP. Where do you live? Besides not in Maryland and also not in DC.
Anonymous
08/19/2024 16:01
Subject: Killing the Purple Line is the prudent economic decision - despite billions spent
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I live on the alignment in DTSS and am psyched for the Purple Line. There is rail in the road outside my house!
Why does that appeal to you?
Because having reliable transportation options that don't require personal car ownership are awesome! Let me guess, you've also been whining and crying about Charles Allen and Brianne Nadeau on this board, too.
NP.
Allen crafted the plan to make fare-evasion legal on Metro.
Your “awesome!” metro is about to collapse financially thanks to the idiot crime-bro Charles Allen, who you voted for, PP.
Admit it: you voted for Allen.
Anonymous
08/18/2024 13:34
Subject: Killing the Purple Line is the prudent economic decision - despite billions spent
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I live on the alignment in DTSS and am psyched for the Purple Line. There is rail in the road outside my house!
Why does that appeal to you?
Because having reliable transportation options that don't require personal car ownership are awesome! Let me guess, you've also been whining and crying about Charles Allen and Brianne Nadeau on this board, too.
Anonymous
08/18/2024 12:07
Subject: Killing the Purple Line is the prudent economic decision - despite billions spent
Anonymous wrote:I live on the alignment in DTSS and am psyched for the Purple Line. There is rail in the road outside my house!
Why does that appeal to you?
Anonymous
08/17/2024 16:58
Subject: Killing the Purple Line is the prudent economic decision - despite billions spent
I live on the alignment in DTSS and am psyched for the Purple Line. There is rail in the road outside my house!