Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:with these HOPE groupings, is there any way to find out what group DC is in and who they are being compared to?
Either the other kids in the class as a whole or the kids being considered for LIV.
Except there are three posts indicating the HOPE ratings are filled out in Nov., before AAP referral were due in Dec.
Then against the whole class, which should help a candidate stand out since they are being compared academically against kids who are not as strong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:with these HOPE groupings, is there any way to find out what group DC is in and who they are being compared to?
Either the other kids in the class as a whole or the kids being considered for LIV.
Except there are three posts indicating the HOPE ratings are filled out in Nov., before AAP referral were due in Dec.
Then against the whole class, which should help a candidate stand out since they are being compared academically against kids who are not as strong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:with these HOPE groupings, is there any way to find out what group DC is in and who they are being compared to?
Either the other kids in the class as a whole or the kids being considered for LIV.
Except there are three posts indicating the HOPE ratings are filled out in Nov., before AAP referral were due in Dec.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:with these HOPE groupings, is there any way to find out what group DC is in and who they are being compared to?
Either the other kids in the class as a whole or the kids being considered for LIV.
Anonymous wrote:with these HOPE groupings, is there any way to find out what group DC is in and who they are being compared to?
Anonymous wrote:with these HOPE groupings, is there any way to find out what group DC is in and who they are being compared to?
Anonymous wrote:On the FCPS HOPE form, is the teacher instructed to "compare" each student to their peers, or does it require the teacher to assess each student independently based on their own behavior and merit?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HOPE aims for equitable identification. Going solely by objective test scores has not been resulting in ideal equity composition. HOPE is our new hope for achieving equity. It's likely high scorers may not get identified by HOPE but then that's why we have appeal process.
Not sure what the "ideal equity composition" is. Not all students perform the same, have the same academic talents, or work as hard. An advanced academic program may not be comprised of exactly proportionate percentages of any group which exists in FCPS. Students who qualify based on scores shouldn't have to appeal. "Forcing" the situation to accommodate poorer students isn't doing anyone any favors. My kid got great test scores and great HOPE scores, so I don't have a personal vendetta against the HOPE assessment, but I also think it's not a reliable input (as in different raters might not rate the same student the same way).
All possible approaches have been attempted, yet achieving an equitable composition remains a challenge. HOPE provides a mechanism for equitable identification by requiring teachers to compare kids within their cultural group. Some argue teachers may not be able to assess students accurately based on social factors, but training revisions is expected to bring more clarity to the ratings assignment. HOPE is a licensed method with published manuals and forms, so the official manual has to be followed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HOPE aims for equitable identification. Going solely by objective test scores has not been resulting in ideal equity composition. HOPE is our new hope for achieving equity. It's likely high scorers may not get identified by HOPE but then that's why we have appeal process.
Not sure what the "ideal equity composition" is. Not all students perform the same, have the same academic talents, or work as hard. An advanced academic program may not be comprised of exactly proportionate percentages of any group which exists in FCPS. Students who qualify based on scores shouldn't have to appeal. "Forcing" the situation to accommodate poorer students isn't doing anyone any favors. My kid got great test scores and great HOPE scores, so I don't have a personal vendetta against the HOPE assessment, but I also think it's not a reliable input (as in different raters might not rate the same student the same way).
Anonymous wrote:HOPE aims for equitable identification. Going solely by objective test scores has not been resulting in ideal equity composition. HOPE is our new hope for achieving equity. It's likely high scorers may not get identified by HOPE but then that's why we have appeal process.
Anonymous wrote:Out of curiosity, when did teachers receive this training? Trying to figure out if our HOPE form was filled out before or after training.