Anonymous wrote:So far at least 8 kids from Sidwell are in
Anonymous wrote:As an IVY+ college, UChicago doesn't have to release data just because a few detractors are call for it.
Anonymous wrote:Nobody wants to just bash a school for no reason. There must be something that you think the ED1 rate is a proxy for. Such that you don’t think ED1/EA together give you any information.
Maybe we can talk about that instead? Are you worried that the school is actually of low quality and that your kid will apply there and not be among his/her intellectual peers? Because i have a kid there and i think i can address that. Kids are really high quality and i am sure your kid will be intellectually challenged and grow.
Is it that you don’t want to waste your ED1 on UChicago until you know what the probability of getting in is? UChicago is notorious for wanting you if you want them. Lots of kids get in ED1 and ED2. My suggestion is that if your kid likes the school, s/he consider applying ED to improve his/her chances.
Is it that you think there is something shady about the admission process because they don’t release their numbers? If so, I suggest you move along and ask your child not to apply. They aren’t going to change their behavior because you call them out on an anonymous website. And you shouldn’t send your precious child and hard earned dollars to a school you don’t trust.
But could please stop with with gratuitous bashing of the school because they don’t give you the info you think you are entitled to as a general member of the public?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chicago is a master at obfuscating statistics to make things favorable to them. They only release numbers that make them look good
Then why are ppl on this thread asking for them? I thought this was the ask by OP. Others have provided stats and then get shot down. Any statistic can be manipulated by any institution. This thread is ridiculous. No one really wants an answer. They just want to bash and put down others.
Ok, I'm thinking maybe you are a marketer. I see what you're doing -- first, you question the people asking, then say thus is asked and answered (nevermind that the stat provided does not answer the question), then demonize all statistics, then demonize anyone questioning the non-answer.
Seems very well crafted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chicago is a master at obfuscating statistics to make things favorable to them. They only release numbers that make them look good
Then why are ppl on this thread asking for them? I thought this was the ask by OP. Others have provided stats and then get shot down. Any statistic can be manipulated by any institution. This thread is ridiculous. No one really wants an answer. They just want to bash and put down others.
Ok, I'm thinking maybe you are a marketer. I see what you're doing -- first, you question the people asking, then say thus is asked and answered (nevermind that the stat provided does not answer the question), then demonize all statistics, then demonize anyone questioning the non-answer.
Seems very well crafted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chicago is a master at obfuscating statistics to make things favorable to them. They only release numbers that make them look good
Then why are ppl on this thread asking for them? I thought this was the ask by OP. Others have provided stats and then get shot down. Any statistic can be manipulated by any institution. This thread is ridiculous. No one really wants an answer. They just want to bash and put down others.