Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Il’m not the previous poster, but please don’t make this into Ballston or Pike and Rose. Why would people live in DH if it just mimics those other places and they have lower taxes and better schools. Let’s rebuild Fh in a way that retains what’s special about the city. And yes, I’d live to see townhomes rather than tiny condos/apartments. We need places for families.
What is "special about the city" in your opinion?
Families live in apartments, too.
They do because there's not any starter home priced options. A $3-4k+ a month 2 bedroom rental apartment is not a substitute for a $500-750k townhouse.
That's the problem with housing right now. There's only two choices - an overpriced rental apartment with waterfall granite countertops or an overpriced detached house with white cabinets.
Rental costs are high, in part, because we've lost the mid-range price points.
News flash: a "starter home" in DC is now a condo. It's not a rowhouse. Please come back from 2005.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Il’m not the previous poster, but please don’t make this into Ballston or Pike and Rose. Why would people live in DH if it just mimics those other places and they have lower taxes and better schools. Let’s rebuild Fh in a way that retains what’s special about the city. And yes, I’d live to see townhomes rather than tiny condos/apartments. We need places for families.
What is "special about the city" in your opinion?
Families live in apartments, too.
They do because there's not any starter home priced options. A $3-4k+ a month 2 bedroom rental apartment is not a substitute for a $500-750k townhouse.
That's the problem with housing right now. There's only two choices - an overpriced rental apartment with waterfall granite countertops or an overpriced detached house with white cabinets.
Rental costs are high, in part, because we've lost the mid-range price points.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Il’m not the previous poster, but please don’t make this into Ballston or Pike and Rose. Why would people live in DH if it just mimics those other places and they have lower taxes and better schools. Let’s rebuild Fh in a way that retains what’s special about the city. And yes, I’d live to see townhomes rather than tiny condos/apartments. We need places for families.
What is "special about the city" in your opinion?
Families live in apartments, too.
Some families live in apartments, but not most. And the apartments they're building in DC are small and expensive. Even if they are lauded as 2 bedroom/2 bath, they are tiny and not conducive to family living. Some of the older apartments are better sized, but those are falling prey to the voucher community. I just think that if a family must choose between a $750k 1000 square foot apartment in DC vs a $750k 2000 square foot house with a yard in Rockville, they will take the latter, especially since the schools are better.
Anonymous wrote:The question is whether that missing middle range should be filled with apartments or townhomes. I argue for townhomes because I think that's what's really missing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Il’m not the previous poster, but please don’t make this into Ballston or Pike and Rose. Why would people live in DH if it just mimics those other places and they have lower taxes and better schools. Let’s rebuild Fh in a way that retains what’s special about the city. And yes, I’d live to see townhomes rather than tiny condos/apartments. We need places for families.
What is "special about the city" in your opinion?
Families live in apartments, too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have young adult children, and they are definitely not seeking 700 square foot 1 1/2 bedroom condos. They want three bedroom townhouses under 2000 square feet for under a million. Do such homes exist? All the new townhouses I see are $2 million and 3000 square feet.
Move to Rockville? You can’t afford NWDC if that’s the case. Idk why people think the world should cater to their budget?
They can’t afford NWDC due to zoning restrictions ….
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Il’m not the previous poster, but please don’t make this into Ballston or Pike and Rose. Why would people live in DH if it just mimics those other places and they have lower taxes and better schools. Let’s rebuild Fh in a way that retains what’s special about the city. And yes, I’d live to see townhomes rather than tiny condos/apartments. We need places for families.
What is "special about the city" in your opinion?
Families live in apartments, too.
Anonymous wrote:I don't have a fundamental issue with apartment buildings, if we needed them, but vacancy rates are high and people are not moving to DC. Who is going to live in these apartments?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But FH will be developed for better or worse. Would you prefer townhomes or high rises? I say this as someone who generally opposes development, but I don't see the point of lots of one bedroom condos that will ultimately be filled with voucher holders.
Townhouses preferred.
Townhomes make a lot more sense. There needs to be a mix of housing options and that is what is missing.
Townhomes are perfect for this area. You can add housing without disrupting the character too much. Way better than condos/apartments.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have young adult children, and they are definitely not seeking 700 square foot 1 1/2 bedroom condos. They want three bedroom townhouses under 2000 square feet for under a million. Do such homes exist? All the new townhouses I see are $2 million and 3000 square feet.
Move to Rockville? You can’t afford NWDC if that’s the case. Idk why people think the world should cater to their budget?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But FH will be developed for better or worse. Would you prefer townhomes or high rises? I say this as someone who generally opposes development, but I don't see the point of lots of one bedroom condos that will ultimately be filled with voucher holders.
Townhouses preferred.
Townhomes make a lot more sense. There needs to be a mix of housing options and that is what is missing.
Anonymous wrote:Il’m not the previous poster, but please don’t make this into Ballston or Pike and Rose. Why would people live in DH if it just mimics those other places and they have lower taxes and better schools. Let’s rebuild Fh in a way that retains what’s special about the city. And yes, I’d live to see townhomes rather than tiny condos/apartments. We need places for families.