Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly the MCPS staff sound incompetent. They are claiming that they need to rank schools by CEP and FARMS and "that's new". It's not clear what ranking "by CEP" means. From what I have read, there is no new federal restriction on collecting income data from families and using that to rank schools for Title 1. MCPS just didn't do it. They also claim they could not have predicted this happening and that is just stunning? Why couldn't you predict this??? It seems completely obvious. Lots of hemming and hawing about how this happens every year and how they don't want to take money from other schools and the principals decided. WTF. I feel bad for the BOE to to have to deal with these morons.
+1 on incompetent. They did not predict the Title I problem and thought it would just be easier on everyone not to push completion of the the FARMS forms.
Is it really a problem?
If fewer people qualified as poor, it might even be an indication that things are improving!
If they indicated the shift was intentional, and justified it based on the data, that would be fine. But instead they said, "We had no idea this would happen! There is nothing we can do and the principals all agreed!"
Where did they say this exactly?
They never said that. What they actually said was that schools move on and off of the Title I list every year, and they will work with the principals to come up with other ways to provide the level of staffing needed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly the MCPS staff sound incompetent. They are claiming that they need to rank schools by CEP and FARMS and "that's new". It's not clear what ranking "by CEP" means. From what I have read, there is no new federal restriction on collecting income data from families and using that to rank schools for Title 1. MCPS just didn't do it. They also claim they could not have predicted this happening and that is just stunning? Why couldn't you predict this??? It seems completely obvious. Lots of hemming and hawing about how this happens every year and how they don't want to take money from other schools and the principals decided. WTF. I feel bad for the BOE to to have to deal with these morons.
+1 on incompetent. They did not predict the Title I problem and thought it would just be easier on everyone not to push completion of the the FARMS forms.
Is it really a problem?
If fewer people qualified as poor, it might even be an indication that things are improving!
If they indicated the shift was intentional, and justified it based on the data, that would be fine. But instead they said, "We had no idea this would happen! There is nothing we can do and the principals all agreed!"
Where did they say this exactly?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly the MCPS staff sound incompetent. They are claiming that they need to rank schools by CEP and FARMS and "that's new". It's not clear what ranking "by CEP" means. From what I have read, there is no new federal restriction on collecting income data from families and using that to rank schools for Title 1. MCPS just didn't do it. They also claim they could not have predicted this happening and that is just stunning? Why couldn't you predict this??? It seems completely obvious. Lots of hemming and hawing about how this happens every year and how they don't want to take money from other schools and the principals decided. WTF. I feel bad for the BOE to to have to deal with these morons.
+1 on incompetent. They did not predict the Title I problem and thought it would just be easier on everyone not to push completion of the the FARMS forms.
Is it really a problem?
If fewer people qualified as poor, it might even be an indication that things are improving!
If they indicated the shift was intentional, and justified it based on the data, that would be fine. But instead they said, "We had no idea this would happen! There is nothing we can do and the principals all agreed!"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly the MCPS staff sound incompetent. They are claiming that they need to rank schools by CEP and FARMS and "that's new". It's not clear what ranking "by CEP" means. From what I have read, there is no new federal restriction on collecting income data from families and using that to rank schools for Title 1. MCPS just didn't do it. They also claim they could not have predicted this happening and that is just stunning? Why couldn't you predict this??? It seems completely obvious. Lots of hemming and hawing about how this happens every year and how they don't want to take money from other schools and the principals decided. WTF. I feel bad for the BOE to to have to deal with these morons.
+1 on incompetent. They did not predict the Title I problem and thought it would just be easier on everyone not to push completion of the the FARMS forms.
Is it really a problem?
If fewer people qualified as poor, it might even be an indication that things are improving!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly the MCPS staff sound incompetent. They are claiming that they need to rank schools by CEP and FARMS and "that's new". It's not clear what ranking "by CEP" means. From what I have read, there is no new federal restriction on collecting income data from families and using that to rank schools for Title 1. MCPS just didn't do it. They also claim they could not have predicted this happening and that is just stunning? Why couldn't you predict this??? It seems completely obvious. Lots of hemming and hawing about how this happens every year and how they don't want to take money from other schools and the principals decided. WTF. I feel bad for the BOE to to have to deal with these morons.
+1 on incompetent. They did not predict the Title I problem and thought it would just be easier on everyone not to push completion of the the FARMS forms.
Is it really a problem?
If fewer people qualified as poor, it might even be an indication that things are improving!
If they indicated the shift was intentional, and justified it based on the data, that would be fine. But instead they said, "We had no idea this would happen! There is nothing we can do and the principals all agreed!"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly the MCPS staff sound incompetent. They are claiming that they need to rank schools by CEP and FARMS and "that's new". It's not clear what ranking "by CEP" means. From what I have read, there is no new federal restriction on collecting income data from families and using that to rank schools for Title 1. MCPS just didn't do it. They also claim they could not have predicted this happening and that is just stunning? Why couldn't you predict this??? It seems completely obvious. Lots of hemming and hawing about how this happens every year and how they don't want to take money from other schools and the principals decided. WTF. I feel bad for the BOE to to have to deal with these morons.
+1 on incompetent. They did not predict the Title I problem and thought it would just be easier on everyone not to push completion of the the FARMS forms.
Is it really a problem?
If fewer people qualified as poor, it might even be an indication that things are improving!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if the CEP program is impacting this. Given that there is no need for families to complete the forms to receive meals, how do they actually know the FARMS rate? Both NHE and Oak View are CEP schools with all students receiving free meals. No one had to complete the forms.
https://www..org/news/quick-notes/2023-08/2023-08-issue/important-information-about-student-meals/
It definitely has. MCPS said not as many families filled out paperwork this year because of free breakfast and lunch from CEP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly the MCPS staff sound incompetent. They are claiming that they need to rank schools by CEP and FARMS and "that's new". It's not clear what ranking "by CEP" means. From what I have read, there is no new federal restriction on collecting income data from families and using that to rank schools for Title 1. MCPS just didn't do it. They also claim they could not have predicted this happening and that is just stunning? Why couldn't you predict this??? It seems completely obvious. Lots of hemming and hawing about how this happens every year and how they don't want to take money from other schools and the principals decided. WTF. I feel bad for the BOE to to have to deal with these morons.
+1 on incompetent. They did not predict the Title I problem and thought it would just be easier on everyone not to push completion of the the FARMS forms.
Is it really a problem?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly the MCPS staff sound incompetent. They are claiming that they need to rank schools by CEP and FARMS and "that's new". It's not clear what ranking "by CEP" means. From what I have read, there is no new federal restriction on collecting income data from families and using that to rank schools for Title 1. MCPS just didn't do it. They also claim they could not have predicted this happening and that is just stunning? Why couldn't you predict this??? It seems completely obvious. Lots of hemming and hawing about how this happens every year and how they don't want to take money from other schools and the principals decided. WTF. I feel bad for the BOE to to have to deal with these morons.
+1 on incompetent. They did not predict the Title I problem and thought it would just be easier on everyone not to push completion of the the FARMS forms.
Anonymous wrote:Honestly the MCPS staff sound incompetent. They are claiming that they need to rank schools by CEP and FARMS and "that's new". It's not clear what ranking "by CEP" means. From what I have read, there is no new federal restriction on collecting income data from families and using that to rank schools for Title 1. MCPS just didn't do it. They also claim they could not have predicted this happening and that is just stunning? Why couldn't you predict this??? It seems completely obvious. Lots of hemming and hawing about how this happens every year and how they don't want to take money from other schools and the principals decided. WTF. I feel bad for the BOE to to have to deal with these morons.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if the CEP program is impacting this. Given that there is no need for families to complete the forms to receive meals, how do they actually know the FARMS rate? Both NHE and Oak View are CEP schools with all students receiving free meals. No one had to complete the forms.
https://www..org/news/quick-notes/2023-08/2023-08-issue/important-information-about-student-meals/
It definitely has. MCPS said not as many families filled out paperwork this year because of free breakfast and lunch from CEP.
Anonymous wrote:I wonder if the CEP program is impacting this. Given that there is no need for families to complete the forms to receive meals, how do they actually know the FARMS rate? Both NHE and Oak View are CEP schools with all students receiving free meals. No one had to complete the forms.
https://www..org/news/quick-notes/2023-08/2023-08-issue/important-information-about-student-meals/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The word is out that the new Title 1 formula MCPS is using cuts Oakview from Title 1 funding. This is because the CES students are from more affluent families which lowers the percentage of FARMS students.
If you are from Oakview or are an advocate for education come to the meeting Wednesday night.
Seems like a reason to move the CES