Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any college in the depressing Rust Belt. There are too many better or equal options in growing regions with good weather and scenic surroundings.
I was in Pittsburgh for a week on business last year, and came away with the impression that it was a city on the rise. It was vibrant and well situated, and it seemed like it had shed its industrial past. YMMV, but I think it'd be a great place to spend four years. (I have no experience with the rest of the Rust Belt though.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any college in the depressing Rust Belt. There are too many better or equal options in growing regions with good weather and scenic surroundings.
I was in Pittsburgh for a week on business last year, and came away with the impression that it was a city on the rise. It was vibrant and well situated, and it seemed like it had shed its industrial past. YMMV, but I think it'd be a great place to spend four years. (I have no experience with the rest of the Rust Belt though.)
Let us know when you move there. Lol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In general I think there will be a push to schools perceived as fun but with good educational rigor. The northeast schools will drop because they are perceived as grim grinds filled with backstabbing, unfriendly people. Political moderation will be appealing. I think this generation of kids, who suffered through covid, has little patience for schools where, fair or not, there is a perception of tolerance of drama queens and waste of education. This will also go with an increasing demand for good ROI.
Excessive drama, misery, and petulance is headed out, solid education, fun, and good ROI is in.
So kids weren't interested in schools that were fun before recently? And plenty of drama and backstabbing in the Southern sorority scene.
They were, but schools in the northeast used to be a lot more fun because there was more personality variety in who they attracted. They used to attract the population that made campuses come alive: the quirky geniuses, the smart frat and sorority kids, the theater kids who had the time in HS to really perfect their craft, etc. But those kids often don’t have the mid-career project management skills that getting perfect GPAs in a test-minimizing environment along with the requisite resume-polishing now requires. So these schools are instead filled with grim armies of Tracy Flicks who don’t understand what “fun” even means.
Have you been on the campus of some of these schools recently? What’s remarkable is how silent they are. It’s like walking through a library, but outside. It’s outright depressing and for some bright kids, that’s not going to be appealing no matter how shiny the name is.
Yikes - what schools are you talking about? My DD is a hs freshman and I want to avoid this type of atmosphere.
Any of the Ivies now.
Walk through them when school is in session and see how quiet and dead they are.
I did and disagree with you. I visited the Yale and Princeton campuses about two months ago with my kid. If I have to pick one word to describe the environment, I’d say vibrant!
Also, my kid got to stay with a Yale freshman friend who took him to a Yale Political Union debate. Kid loved it but was shocked because the media coverage would have you believe there are no conservative voices on campus. Simply not true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any college in the depressing Rust Belt. There are too many better or equal options in growing regions with good weather and scenic surroundings.
I was in Pittsburgh for a week on business last year, and came away with the impression that it was a city on the rise. It was vibrant and well situated, and it seemed like it had shed its industrial past. YMMV, but I think it'd be a great place to spend four years. (I have no experience with the rest of the Rust Belt though.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any college in the depressing Rust Belt. There are too many better or equal options in growing regions with good weather and scenic surroundings.
I was in Pittsburgh for a week on business last year, and came away with the impression that it was a city on the rise. It was vibrant and well situated, and it seemed like it had shed its industrial past. YMMV, but I think it'd be a great place to spend four years. (I have no experience with the rest of the Rust Belt though.)
Anonymous wrote:Right now the top firms that pay the most are some tech firms, pe shops and quant funds. Those firms don't care where you went to school but how fast you can solve problems or code. Going to a good school just assures you atleadt get an interview. The interviews are purely technical. They are not looking for squash players. There is another category of jobs that looks for skills that student athletes bring. If someone is great at something be it math, physics or a sport, there is a place for that person because they will appeal to some employer's preference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Right now the top firms that pay the most are some tech firms, pe shops and quant funds. Those firms don't care where you went to school but how fast you can solve problems or code. Going to a good school just assures you atleadt get an interview. The interviews are purely technical. They are not looking for squash players. There is another category of jobs that looks for skills that student athletes bring. If someone is great at something be it math, physics or a sport, there is a place for that person because they will appeal to some employer's preference.
Can’t speak about tech firms and quant funds, but I have spent 20+ years in private equity, working for some of the big ones and I can tell you that you are completely wrong! PE remains VERY pedigree driven. Firms recruit almost exclusively from Ivy plus Schools. It’s nearly impossible to get an interview if you don’t come from one of these schools.
Also, people on here act like the kids coming from Ivy plus don’t have the tech skills. I don’t know what you are smoking. Year after year we get Ivy plus candidates with top tech skills. On top of that, they all have top GPAs and have proved strong leadership ability, either in a sport or another competitive on campus activity. They are fiercely competitive.
Anonymous wrote:Right now the top firms that pay the most are some tech firms, pe shops and quant funds. Those firms don't care where you went to school but how fast you can solve problems or code. Going to a good school just assures you atleadt get an interview. The interviews are purely technical. They are not looking for squash players. There is another category of jobs that looks for skills that student athletes bring. If someone is great at something be it math, physics or a sport, there is a place for that person because they will appeal to some employer's preference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any college in the depressing Rust Belt. There are too many better or equal options in growing regions with good weather and scenic surroundings.
You keep saying that yet Big 10 universities in the so-called Rust Belt are enjoying a surge in applications. Lots of kids don't want to go south for different reasons and can get the big school, big time sports, fun party experience in the Big 10.
Anonymous wrote:Any college in the depressing Rust Belt. There are too many better or equal options in growing regions with good weather and scenic surroundings.
Anonymous wrote:I dont' care about Yale athletics because it's a smaller portion of the population.
And in this environment, everyone is getting a job. unemployment is at a low.
I do care about the weird college dynamics when, as someone said earlier, schools are either free-ride Pell or full pay St Ann's squash players. That's a weird dynamic for classroom discussions.
Anonymous wrote:Any college in the depressing Rust Belt. There are too many better or equal options in growing regions with good weather and scenic surroundings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My take:
With 2.8 billion Chinese and Indians, a growing Asian domestic population, and a finite number of slots at top schools, my hypothesis is that the top schools we see today will retain their status PLUS get increasingly more difficult to gain entry. The skills necessary for technological advancements dictates that high-demand STEM graduates will continue to fuel the gap between "elite (and near-elite) institutions and everyone else. The number of international students studying in the US have doubled over the past 10 years. These students very much are "name driven" which drives the cycle of upward selectivity at all but a few schools.
My list:
Rich get richer category
Ivies + UChicago, Stanford, MIT, Caltech, Duke, Johns Hopkins, Rice, Vanderbilt, Notre Dame, Georgetown, Emory, Wash. Univ at SL
Through inertia they will continue to be the #1 destination for the world's elite. In spite of the spotlight shone on some of the contentious issues of today, I don't see these universities are going anywhere.
The UC system:
More demand, same supply. Center of tech and innovation. Historically, less than half the price of comparable private schools. Increasing demographic changes skewing Asian ensures robust demand. Internationals love the UC's.
Top flight publics outside of the UC's:
UVA, UNC, Michigan, UIUC, UGA, Florida, Texas, A&M
Population growth in the south, plus tradition, plus in-state tuition will continue to drive the bus. Crazy to think that Florida and UGA are now considered to be top flight universities.
Location-driven universities:
Boston, New York, Washington DC, Atlanta, Miami, Dallas, Los Angeles
These schools benefit from being in a world-class city. Like the UC's, internationals love these schools. The university enriches the city; likewise, the city enriches the university.
BU, Northeastern, NYU, UMiami, USC, (Tulane??).
The potential up and comers:
East coast: Does GWU or American make that next-level leap considering the draw of D.C.? Again, limited supply at "top" schools means that the top will be filtered lower.
In Texas, does Texas, A&M and Rice suck the oxygen out so that a school like SMU can never make that leap? A growing state with a finite number of elite institutions.
The above bolded private schools will CONTINUE to decline for the foreseeable future for the same/similar reasons they declined this year.
Anonymous wrote:I dont' care about Yale athletics because it's a smaller portion of the population.
And in this environment, everyone is getting a job. unemployment is at a low.
I do care about the weird college dynamics when, as someone said earlier, schools are either free-ride Pell or full pay St Ann's squash players. That's a weird dynamic for classroom discussions.