Anonymous wrote:Wondering. Lot of women gain a lot of weight they can't lose after a baby. Some I see with gray or white hair immediately after or while pregnant. Melasma and new wrinkles. I'd like kids but wondering if the reason most celebrities use surrogates is because they don't want a baby to wreck their body. A lot of celebs over 30 are using surrogates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's absolutely worth it, and people are absolutely kidding themselves when they say they've aged the same way as childless women. The sleep factor alone is huge.
In the little kid years that’s true but it all catches up in your 50s.
No way. There was a childfree woman at my gym that I thought was 32 yrs old max. Someone told her she would lose her physique after she had kids and to “wait until you also hit menopause.” She responded saying she is 55 and post menopause. Mic drop. I would not have believed it in a million years but is true. Totally shut down that conversation. 😁
How do you know it’s true?
Because I was there and witnessed the conversation.
Lol, no; how do you know she’s actually 55 and post-menopause?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For me, there was no question. I always wanted kids and am happy to have them. I also got lucky and got two awesome kids.
But, seriously, if you are even asking this question, just don't have kids. Your priorities are screwed up. If you were asking about risks to your -health- and the changes that can happen with pregnancy to your health, that would be one thing. But your looks? Nope. Don't have kids. Just do what you do best and focus on yourself.
+1 to all of this. If you are even asking this question, do not have children.
Disagree. It’s okay to be vain and prioritize looks and still have kids.
Assuming you are one of these vain people, did worries about your looks even factor into your *decision-making* about having kids? No one is saying a person who places value on their own appearance cannot be a good parent. But that is not what OP was asking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For me, there was no question. I always wanted kids and am happy to have them. I also got lucky and got two awesome kids.
But, seriously, if you are even asking this question, just don't have kids. Your priorities are screwed up. If you were asking about risks to your -health- and the changes that can happen with pregnancy to your health, that would be one thing. But your looks? Nope. Don't have kids. Just do what you do best and focus on yourself.
+1 to all of this. If you are even asking this question, do not have children.
Disagree. It’s okay to be vain and prioritize looks and still have kids.
Assuming you are one of these vain people, did worries about your looks even factor into your *decision-making* about having kids? No one is saying a person who places value on their own appearance cannot be a good parent. But that is not what OP was asking.
OP here. Nowhere did I say it factored into MY decision making process. I asked if it factored into other women's decision making process because I have seen women look aged as much as 10 or 15 yrs older than their ages. I looked like a kid next to them and I'm probably older than them.
How do you know that it was kids that "aged" those particular women? They could have other health issues or stressors in their lives.
You are a sorry person, OP. Stop obsessing over how other people look. Grow some character.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, OP, you don't sound like you're cut out for motherhood.
-signed a 45 year old mother of 2 who still looks good
Honestly Anonymous, you sound like a critical tool and did a disservice to the world birthing those kids.
-signed someone with an open mind who reads before responding
OP is backtracking now because PPs have called her out for the immature, vain tool she is. Too late, OP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's absolutely worth it, and people are absolutely kidding themselves when they say they've aged the same way as childless women. The sleep factor alone is huge.
In the little kid years that’s true but it all catches up in your 50s.
No way. There was a childfree woman at my gym that I thought was 32 yrs old max. Someone told her she would lose her physique after she had kids and to “wait until you also hit menopause.” She responded saying she is 55 and post menopause. Mic drop. I would not have believed it in a million years but is true. Totally shut down that conversation. 😁
How do you know it’s true?
Because I was there and witnessed the conversation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For me, there was no question. I always wanted kids and am happy to have them. I also got lucky and got two awesome kids.
But, seriously, if you are even asking this question, just don't have kids. Your priorities are screwed up. If you were asking about risks to your -health- and the changes that can happen with pregnancy to your health, that would be one thing. But your looks? Nope. Don't have kids. Just do what you do best and focus on yourself.
+1 to all of this. If you are even asking this question, do not have children.
Disagree. It’s okay to be vain and prioritize looks and still have kids.
Assuming you are one of these vain people, did worries about your looks even factor into your *decision-making* about having kids? No one is saying a person who places value on their own appearance cannot be a good parent. But that is not what OP was asking.
OP here. Nowhere did I say it factored into MY decision making process. I asked if it factored into other women's decision making process because I have seen women look aged as much as 10 or 15 yrs older than their ages. I looked like a kid next to them and I'm probably older than them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, OP, you don't sound like you're cut out for motherhood.
-signed a 45 year old mother of 2 who still looks good
Honestly Anonymous, you sound like a critical tool and did a disservice to the world birthing those kids.
-signed someone with an open mind who reads before responding
Anonymous wrote:My childless friends look the same as me at 40.
The main thing is to make sure to get rid of the baby weight.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's absolutely worth it, and people are absolutely kidding themselves when they say they've aged the same way as childless women. The sleep factor alone is huge.
In the little kid years that’s true but it all catches up in your 50s.
No way. There was a childfree woman at my gym that I thought was 32 yrs old max. Someone told her she would lose her physique after she had kids and to “wait until you also hit menopause.” She responded saying she is 55 and post menopause. Mic drop. I would not have believed it in a million years but is true. Totally shut down that conversation. 😁
It's called the genetic lottery. That woman would probably look fantastic with kids too.
No. You need to take care of yourself to do this. Even with good genetics you can look like crap if you don’t take care of yourself.