Ok, she tried to call Christine. I still find it bizarre the husband was returning home simply because there was someone's car there. They don't live in some remote area with no people around.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not sure if that's true, but one of the latest articles says the au pair came to the house and called the husband when she saw Ryan's car parked. Why would you assume smth has happened if you simply see a car in your driveway? She didn't enter the house yet, nor did she try to call Christine to ask her about it.

Where did you see that? The au pair lived at the house, where was she coming from that time of morning? The daughter was in the house so who was watching her?

Found it:
"The au pair told police after the shooting that she and the husband were gone, and when she came back to the home, she saw a car she didn't recognize. She then called Christine Banfield, who she believed was alone inside, police said.

When the wife didn't answer, she called the husband, who came home, she told police.

Then, she told police she went up to the bedroom and saw Ryan with a knife, and that Banfield had been stabbed. Police said she told them that the husband shot Ryan.

Police say there's no evidence that Ryan broke into the house.

"The connection that we've been able to locate through the investigation is that he was known to the victim, Christine Banfield," Weeks said."

This story is so nuts that I can't tell what is bad reporting and what are inconsistencies in the AP's story?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not sure if that's true, but one of the latest articles says the au pair came to the house and called the husband when she saw Ryan's car parked. Why would you assume smth has happened if you simply see a car in your driveway? She didn't enter the house yet, nor did she try to call Christine to ask her about it.

Where did you see that? The au pair lived at the house, where was she coming from that time of morning? The daughter was in the house so who was watching her?

Found it:
"The au pair told police after the shooting that she and the husband were gone, and when she came back to the home, she saw a car she didn't recognize. She then called Christine Banfield, who she believed was alone inside, police said.

When the wife didn't answer, she called the husband, who came home, she told police.

Then, she told police she went up to the bedroom and saw Ryan with a knife, and that Banfield had been stabbed. Police said she told them that the husband shot Ryan.

Police say there's no evidence that Ryan broke into the house.

"The connection that we've been able to locate through the investigation is that he was known to the victim, Christine Banfield," Weeks said."

Anonymous wrote:Not sure if that's true, but one of the latest articles says the au pair came to the house and called the husband when she saw Ryan's car parked. Why would you assume smth has happened if you simply see a car in your driveway? She didn't enter the house yet, nor did she try to call Christine to ask her about it.

Yeah I read that and thought it was weird. You are an AP employed by the family and see an unknown car in front of the house. Why would you automatically assume there is grave danger?

Anonymous wrote:Not sure if that's true, but one of the latest articles says the au pair came to the house and called the husband when she saw Ryan's car parked. Why would you assume smth has happened if you simply see a car in your driveway? She didn't enter the house yet, nor did she try to call Christine to ask her about it.

Where did you see that? The au pair lived at the house, where was she coming from that time of morning? The daughter was in the house so who was watching her?

Not sure if that's true, but one of the latest articles says the au pair came to the house and called the husband when she saw Ryan's car parked. Why would you assume smth has happened if you simply see a car in your driveway? She didn't enter the house yet, nor did she try to call Christine to ask her about it.

In the press conference, it was a little unclear but I believe someone asked for confirmation that the AP did not know who the person was that she shot and the spokesperson confirmed that was their understanding.

If true, that is a big head scratcher to me and points away somewhat from the theory that the AP and BB were conspiring together.

Anonymous wrote:Can someone link to the other thread?

There’s a link earlier in this thread.

In the press conference, LE said that they may never know the motive for the AP to kill JR. And they know way more than the public.

So it may never make sense.

Can someone link to the other thread?

Anonymous wrote:I'd put the odds of Dateline and 48 Hours covering this case at 100%.

Someone on the other thread said its already in the works....

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was the au pair living in the house since the murder?

Yes

"to provide consistency for the 4 yo daughter"

Where is this quote from?

It was someone's reasoning on the other locked thread.

I thought it was weird that no one as the press conf asked if they have talked to BB yet. I mean why are we assuming he hasn't spoken since March? They asked if they knew his location and they said yes.

Does anyone have a link to the court documents?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was the au pair living in the house since the murder?

Yes

"to provide consistency for the 4 yo daughter"

Where is this quote from?