Anonymous
10/04/2023 17:15
Subject: Re:Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Either lying, not terribly smart, or confused for some unknown reason.
None of them speaks well for this representative.
None of them speaks well for this representative.
Anonymous
10/04/2023 17:05
Subject: Re:Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The Democrats were slow rolling, i.e. walking into the vote one at a time, etc. Jeffries then spoke for a long time because the funding for Ukraine had been stripped out. They didn't yet know that McCarthy had cut a backroom deal re: funding for Ukraine.
They have 15 minutes to vote. It was a perfectly normal vote.
They were slow rolling the START of the vote
Anonymous
10/04/2023 15:53
Subject: Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Anonymous wrote:What would he gain from deliberately pulling the alarm and postponing a vote? Please help me understand why people think he may have done this deliberately.
I guess he was confused or not very smart or doesn't read carefully? Red signs with bold lettering are hard to ignore.
Anonymous
10/04/2023 15:15
Subject: Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
There’s literally no Speaker of the House, but this dumb thread is 10 pages about a locked door in an office building & an alarm pulled.
Bread & circuses.
Bread & circuses.
Anonymous
10/04/2023 13:23
Subject: Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
He's either insanely stupid or a naked liar. Likely both.
Anonymous
10/04/2023 12:23
Subject: Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We're not even saying ol Handjob Boobert has to get kicked out
No self-respecting adult talks like this.
No self-respecting adult gives handjobs to random dudes in crowded theaters full of kids.
No self-respecting adult votes a person who gives handjobs to random dudes in crowded theaters full of kids into Congress.
Anonymous
10/04/2023 12:19
Subject: Re:Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Anonymous wrote:
The Democrats were slow rolling, i.e. walking into the vote one at a time, etc. Jeffries then spoke for a long time because the funding for Ukraine had been stripped out. They didn't yet know that McCarthy had cut a backroom deal re: funding for Ukraine.
So, slow rolling is a thing in Congress. Maybe you've never heard of that?
Anonymous
10/04/2023 12:18
Subject: Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Anonymous wrote:Of things that transpired in Congress last week, this one is really not registering to me as especially significant or embarrassing by comparison.
X a million. He maybe was dumb. Or rushing. Not thinking. Or whatever. But I'm not seeing malice anywhere. And really, we've all done dumb things. So . . . moving on.
Anonymous
10/04/2023 12:13
Subject: Re:Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Anonymous wrote:
The Democrats were slow rolling, i.e. walking into the vote one at a time, etc. Jeffries then spoke for a long time because the funding for Ukraine had been stripped out. They didn't yet know that McCarthy had cut a backroom deal re: funding for Ukraine.
They have 15 minutes to vote. It was a perfectly normal vote.
Anonymous
10/04/2023 11:33
Subject: Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We're not even saying ol Handjob Boobert has to get kicked out
No self-respecting adult talks like this.
I think Handjob Boobert earned her nickname
What's weird is her being part of a party that otherwise seems so professional and together!
Anonymous
Anonymous
10/04/2023 11:18
Subject: Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Anonymous wrote:We're not even saying ol Handjob Boobert has to get kicked out
No self-respecting adult talks like this.
Anonymous
10/03/2023 13:16
Subject: Re:Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
The Democrats were slow rolling, i.e. walking into the vote one at a time, etc. Jeffries then spoke for a long time because the funding for Ukraine had been stripped out. They didn't yet know that McCarthy had cut a backroom deal re: funding for Ukraine.
Anonymous
10/03/2023 11:08
Subject: Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Anonymous wrote:What would he gain from deliberately pulling the alarm and postponing a vote? Please help me understand why people think he may have done this deliberately.
And in another building.
They know he didn’t do it deliberately. They don’t care. Everything is meaningless to them; they exist to troll.
Anonymous
10/03/2023 10:47
Subject: Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
What would he gain from deliberately pulling the alarm and postponing a vote? Please help me understand why people think he may have done this deliberately.