Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Davis? I’m not opposed to voting for a Republican who isn’t primarily motivated by a desire to punish gay and trans teenagers, but there’s no agenda on her website. Her issues page just says that she wants academic achievement and better special education services. How?
Republicans know that if they write a detailed issues page, they will lose voters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Davis? I’m not opposed to voting for a Republican who isn’t primarily motivated by a desire to punish gay and trans teenagers, but there’s no agenda on her website. Her issues page just says that she wants academic achievement and better special education services. How?
Republicans know that if they write a detailed issues page, they will lose voters.
To me, my decision is not about what republican candidates will do. My decision is majorly based on what democratic school boards have done. No matter how hard the leftists are trying to intimidate people, I just want to give non-democrats a try. Democratic school boards are overly passionate to promote their ideology at public school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. Who is a good "at large" candidate to vote for if you want someone who is moderate?
Davis, Moon, and Hussien
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Davis? I’m not opposed to voting for a Republican who isn’t primarily motivated by a desire to punish gay and trans teenagers, but there’s no agenda on her website. Her issues page just says that she wants academic achievement and better special education services. How?
Republicans know that if they write a detailed issues page, they will lose voters.
To me, my decision is not about what republican candidates will do. My decision is majorly based on what democratic school boards have done. No matter how hard the leftists are trying to intimidate people, I just want to give non-democrats a try. Democratic school boards are overly passionate to promote their ideology at public school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Davis? I’m not opposed to voting for a Republican who isn’t primarily motivated by a desire to punish gay and trans teenagers, but there’s no agenda on her website. Her issues page just says that she wants academic achievement and better special education services. How?
Republicans know that if they write a detailed issues page, they will lose voters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. Who is a good "at large" candidate to vote for if you want someone who is moderate?
Davis, Moon, and Hussien
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. Who is a good "at large" candidate to vote for if you want someone who is moderate?
Davis, Moon, and Hussien
You have a strange definition of moderate. One of them seems barely literate on their own website https://husseinforschoolboard.com/
Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Davis? I’m not opposed to voting for a Republican who isn’t primarily motivated by a desire to punish gay and trans teenagers, but there’s no agenda on her website. Her issues page just says that she wants academic achievement and better special education services. How?
Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Davis? I’m not opposed to voting for a Republican who isn’t primarily motivated by a desire to punish gay and trans teenagers, but there’s no agenda on her website. Her issues page just says that she wants academic achievement and better special education services. How?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The posters on here are not doing the R candidates any favors with moderates.
Yelling facists and slurs towards adult parents presenting factual information is not representing the left very well.
You don't have too much to worry about - I am likely voting Tisler, Davis, Moon, and McDaniel - but I'll be surprised if any non-dems win.
Yeah, none will win because of their narrow focus on cultural issues. There was an opportunity for a moderate or two to break through this year becUse of widespread dissatisfaction but they didn’t offer the right candidates.
You have a weird perspective where focusing on education (academic rigor, remediation, teacher salaries and job satisfaction, and decent facilities) is a “cultural issue” and focusing on “equal outcomes for all” and boys in girls’ bathrooms is deemed the norm.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. Who is a good "at large" candidate to vote for if you want someone who is moderate?
Davis, Moon, and Hussien
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The posters on here are not doing the R candidates any favors with moderates.
Yelling facists and slurs towards adult parents presenting factual information is not representing the left very well.
You don't have too much to worry about - I am likely voting Tisler, Davis, Moon, and McDaniel - but I'll be surprised if any non-dems win.
Yeah, none will win because of their narrow focus on cultural issues. There was an opportunity for a moderate or two to break through this year becUse of widespread dissatisfaction but they didn’t offer the right candidates.
Tisler is focused on academic achievement and special education issues.
She is a former educator snd would be a tremendous asset to the school board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. Who is a good "at large" candidate to vote for if you want someone who is moderate?
Davis, Moon, and Hussien
Anonymous wrote:NP. Who is a good "at large" candidate to vote for if you want someone who is moderate?