Anonymous
Post 07/17/2023 08:55     Subject: Non-Famous but Frequent DCUM Posters III
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I hesitate to write this in case I summon them like Lord Voldemort but….the kate Middleton Superfan.


This is so hilariously accurate. 3 minutes!


😄😄😄

Yes, that was hysterical. She appeared as if summoned by magic incantation within three minutes!

Sorry PP you actually did summon her like Lord Voldemort.
Anonymous
Post 07/17/2023 08:54     Subject: Non-Famous but Frequent DCUM Posters III
Anonymous wrote:Person who swears everyone loves pigs in a blanket


I think this is me. Pigs in a blanket and deviled eggs. DCUM pretends these are gross but they are always the first to disappear at parties.
Anonymous
Post 07/17/2023 08:54     Subject: Non-Famous but Frequent DCUM Posters III
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I hesitate to write this in case I summon them like Lord Voldemort but….the kate Middleton Superfan.


This is so hilariously accurate. 3 minutes!


The Meghan Superfan is worse - she tracks how much work Kate has done on spreadsheets!
Anonymous
Post 07/17/2023 08:53     Subject: Non-Famous but Frequent DCUM Posters III
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:"I see Kate's PR team has entered the room" lady on every Kate Middleton thread. No, sweetheart, PR people for the Royals aren't bothering themselves with some piddly little website in the U.S. that nobody knows or cares about.


Lol I posted earlier about the PR conspiracy lady. Could there be more than one?


There was a crazy poster recently on the Kevin Costner divorce thread who seemed firmly convinced that Kevin Costner’s PR team has been frantically hitting refresh on that thread.
Anonymous
Post 07/17/2023 08:51     Subject: Non-Famous but Frequent DCUM Posters III
Anonymous wrote:I hesitate to write this in case I summon them like Lord Voldemort but….the kate Middleton Superfan.


This is so hilariously accurate. 3 minutes!
Anonymous
Post 07/17/2023 08:50     Subject: Non-Famous but Frequent DCUM Posters III
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:DP but I use littles all the time. So much easiet than saying "my three younger children."

Is it also insipid to say Fridge?


Is it a term used by prolific breeders? When you have to differentiate between your various groupings of children?


So your problem is with people with kids, not language. Got it. Simple bigotry at play.


People with large numbers of kids. So many kids they need to categorize them.
Anonymous
Post 07/17/2023 08:48     Subject: Non-Famous but Frequent DCUM Posters III
Anonymous wrote:"I see Kate's PR team has entered the room" lady on every Kate Middleton thread. No, sweetheart, PR people for the Royals aren't bothering themselves with some piddly little website in the U.S. that nobody knows or cares about.


Lol I posted earlier about the PR conspiracy lady. Could there be more than one?
Anonymous
Post 07/17/2023 08:45     Subject: Non-Famous but Frequent DCUM Posters III
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:DP but I use littles all the time. So much easiet than saying "my three younger children."

Is it also insipid to say Fridge?


Is it a term used by prolific breeders? When you have to differentiate between your various groupings of children?


So your problem is with people with kids, not language. Got it. Simple bigotry at play.
Anonymous
Post 07/17/2023 08:42     Subject: Non-Famous but Frequent DCUM Posters III
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:DP but I use littles all the time. So much easiet than saying "my three younger children."

Is it also insipid to say Fridge?


Is it a term used by prolific breeders? When you have to differentiate between your various groupings of children?


Omg this post wins for the day.
Anonymous
Post 07/17/2023 08:41     Subject: Non-Famous but Frequent DCUM Posters III
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I hesitate to write this in case I summon them like Lord Voldemort but….the kate Middleton Superfan.


Likewise, the Meghan fan and conspiracy theorist. I think I'm quoting her.


lololol-no, I just occasionally lurk in the royals threads out of curiosity about the subculture of the people who feel really strongly


NP. It is right on the nose for the summoned Kate Middleton SuperFan to (a) respond instantly to any post mentioning Kate Middleton anywhere on DCUM and (b) immediately assume someone who doesn’t overtly praise Kate Middleton in all posts is a fan of Meghan. That exchange was almost a picture perfect example of how the Kate Middleton SuperFan works.

I’m honestly so fascinated by her. I also occasionally lurk in the royals threads, not because I have any love for any of the royals, but because I think the Kate Middleton SuperFan is an entertaining DCUM character.
Anonymous
Post 07/17/2023 08:39     Subject: Non-Famous but Frequent DCUM Posters III
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The anti-littles poster.


The littles poster who think only one person is annoyed by her use of the term "littles".


+1.

I’d also like to add: people who can’t seem to understand when more than one person are disagreeing with them, so they accuse others of sockpuppeting or being the OP posting yet again or something. Just accept that people don’t agree with you. It’s not a conspiracy or trolling, really.


Yes to this.

The littles posters also seem to not understand that the anonymous nature of DCUM means that using cutesy language is always going to be less well received than it might be in a text to friends or when posting on Facebook. Those people know you, and may either share your affection for these terms or simply be willing to overlook it because they know and like you.

On DCUM, you are what you post. When you post comments about your kids and refer to them as "littles", other posters know nothing else about you, and you come off to a lot of people as unserious, twee, and a little dumb.

The lack of self awareness there is almost as annoying as the terms themselves.


Case in point - another post by the anti little poster


God, you’re dull. Once again, it’s not a single poster. Using “Littles” is insipid and if you do it, multiple people will tell you it’s insipid. DP.


Meh. I don’t think there is anything wrong with using littles. It’s cute.
Anonymous
Post 07/17/2023 08:37     Subject: Non-Famous but Frequent DCUM Posters III
Anonymous wrote:DP but I use littles all the time. So much easiet than saying "my three younger children."

Is it also insipid to say Fridge?


Is it a term used by prolific breeders? When you have to differentiate between your various groupings of children?
Anonymous
Post 07/17/2023 08:36     Subject: Non-Famous but Frequent DCUM Posters III
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Those women who always want to date the top 1 percent of men who are 6 feet or taller and make at least 500k but have no career, average looking, materialistic, and don't want to work for their money.


You mean the SATC lifestyle? Thank SJP for romanticizing it


Gotta love crazy Brunch Granny.


I actually think she has a point.
Anonymous
Post 07/17/2023 08:28     Subject: Non-Famous but Frequent DCUM Posters III
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I hesitate to write this in case I summon them like Lord Voldemort but….the kate Middleton Superfan.


Likewise, the Meghan fan and conspiracy theorist. I think I'm quoting her.


lololol-no, I just occasionally lurk in the royals threads out of curiosity about the subculture of the people who feel really strongly
Anonymous
Post 07/17/2023 08:22     Subject: Non-Famous but Frequent DCUM Posters III
Anonymous wrote:I hesitate to write this in case I summon them like Lord Voldemort but….the kate Middleton Superfan.


Likewise, the Meghan fan and conspiracy theorist. I think I'm quoting her.