Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t this in the press more? The Hunton and Hoppe families are well known in Richmond circles.
Someone is getting major preferential treatment here.
But outside of that area no one knows them so this should be getting nationwide coverage
where is Fox and CNN when you need them
Honestly these stories rarely make the national news. It’s awful but not unusual.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t this in the press more? The Hunton and Hoppe families are well known in Richmond circles.
Someone is getting major preferential treatment here.
But outside of that area no one knows them so this should be getting nationwide coverage
where is Fox and CNN when you need them
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t this in the press more? The Hunton and Hoppe families are well known in Richmond circles.
Someone is getting major preferential treatment here.
But outside of that area no one knows them so this should be getting nationwide coverage
where is Fox and CNN when you need them
Anonymous wrote:Her ex-husband was on the Board of Directors for a Child Advocacy Center (for abused children) in 2016. http://www.foothillscac.org/uploads/9/9/2/1/9921414/foothills-cac-brochure-dec-2016.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I took a look at the charging document and there's so much disgusting about it. Starting with the fact that guys like the one the undercover agent was pretending to be do exist. And also her story that she was trying to sting him. ugh ugh ugh. Her communications are just so sick. Good thing she didn't try harder to cover her tracks.
The UC was a creep for asking for naked photos of her.
What are you, her sister?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A female relative of mine, who was a high school teacher at the time, was caught f*** students. So a woman is definitely capable of being a pedophile.!
No excuse, since it is obviously very wrong to have sex with people that much younger and who are still minors, but technically someone is a pedophile only if the victim has not yet gone through puberty. Most high school kids have gone through puberty.
A high school teacher f($king their students is a pedo. A man doing it would be called one and everyone would agree.
No they wouldn’t! I wouldn’t. I think they’re awful and a sexual predator. But they aren’t a pedophile. Most men think 16-17 year old fully mature girls are attractive. It doesn’t mean they’ll sleep with them HOPEFULLY. But it’s a far cry from finding a 6 year old “attractive”.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She had to have been sexually abused at one point.
Who gaf? I was abused as a child. Guess what I don't do? Yup, I don't abuse children.
This!!
If we don’t investigate the motives, backgrounds or rehabilitation of child abusers, children will continue to be abused.
Frankly, this is one of those issues were it isn’t socially acceptable to show up to your physician and say “I have a desire to abuse children.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She had to have been sexually abused at one point.
Who gaf? I was abused as a child. Guess what I don't do? Yup, I don't abuse children.
This!!
Anonymous wrote:I won’t be reading the linked articles, won’t be able to sleep if l do. Just clicked on the first one to see her picture. Don’t know her thankfully.
I read up a bit on pedophiles and what can be done. What I’ve read is mainly about men, because they are over 90%. It would have never occurred to me to worry about women too. So disturbing. For men who’ve been caught, some suggest medical castration. However what l read is that high pedos don’t have higher testosterone than the general population and the medical castration lowers testosterone and drive, so that my not be very effective. Anti social disorder (not having emphathy etc) is the leading indicator that someone will sexually abuse kids. Usually the pedos feel no remorse or concern for the kids, they are completely self absorbed. This is just what l remember, I’m not a professional but read up a bit to try to protect my kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I took a look at the charging document and there's so much disgusting about it. Starting with the fact that guys like the one the undercover agent was pretending to be do exist. And also her story that she was trying to sting him. ugh ugh ugh. Her communications are just so sick. Good thing she didn't try harder to cover her tracks.
The UC was a creep for asking for naked photos of her.
Read the charging documents. It was probably a plow to help identify her. She apparently shows her face in the nudes and the FBI used that to match against her FB profile.
But way to be a weirdo. The FBI agent was a woman.
Huh? Where does it say the identity of the agent?