Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It would depend on how diverse the Asian group was. The danger is that a university where everyone majors in computer science and plays the violin (a stereotype, I know) isn't going to be as academically strong in other areas. Harvard isn't just known for producing mathematicians. It's knowing for producing politicians and climate change activists and great feminist thinkers and theologians and authors and mayors, etc. Artists. If the vast majority of those admitted are admitted because they scored really high on the math section of the SAT and have lots of AP statistics courses then it's likely that none of them will write the next great Broadway musical or become a journalist -- particularly if they have parents who actively steer them away from the pursuit of these types of goals. I was a reader for a prestigious internaitonal scholarship awhile ago and I remember wondering what would happen when everyone who applied for the fellowship was a stats major or data science, or if maybe no one would apply at all.
Way to perpetuate the stereotype of Asians being math nerds.These kids are scoring 1500+ on the SATs, which means that they're scoring at least a 700 on the verbal portion of the SAT.
The ^PP is math challenged. Maybe they need to focus on math more. LOL
Forgive me but maybe I am too... can you explain?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those whole thread is a racist dumpster fire. Just ignore it.
The value of dcum is it provides a behind the curtain look as to people”s real thoughts
4chan for the Lily Pulitzer set.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about the crackers? Are we done with touring our 60-70% mixed race or identify of color incoming classes?
Every damn info session we attended this spring break the speaker sang poetic about having fewer than 25-30% identifying as Caucasian only.
Have they even thought how this sounds to the white Kidd who have been hearing “need not apply” for the past 3 years?
“Crackers” should take it up with ashkenazis who take half the “white” spots and are overrepresented 10-20x at top schools
Not overrepresented relative to their qualifications
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those whole thread is a racist dumpster fire. Just ignore it.
The value of dcum is it provides a behind the curtain look as to people”s real thoughts
4chan for the Lily Pulitzer set.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about the crackers? Are we done with touring our 60-70% mixed race or identify of color incoming classes?
Every damn info session we attended this spring break the speaker sang poetic about having fewer than 25-30% identifying as Caucasian only.
Have they even thought how this sounds to the white Kidd who have been hearing “need not apply” for the past 3 years?
“Crackers” should take it up with ashkenazis who take half the “white” spots and are overrepresented 10-20x at top schools
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those whole thread is a racist dumpster fire. Just ignore it.
The value of dcum is it provides a behind the curtain look as to people”s real thoughts
4chan for the Lily Pulitzer set.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about the crackers? Are we done with touring our 60-70% mixed race or identify of color incoming classes?
Every damn info session we attended this spring break the speaker sang poetic about having fewer than 25-30% identifying as Caucasian only.
Have they even thought how this sounds to the white Kidd who have been hearing “need not apply” for the past 3 years?
“Crackers” should take it up with ashkenazis who take half the “white” spots and are overrepresented 10-20x at top schools
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those whole thread is a racist dumpster fire. Just ignore it.
The value of dcum is it provides a behind the curtain look as to people”s real thoughts
Anonymous wrote:Those whole thread is a racist dumpster fire. Just ignore it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about the crackers? Are we done with touring our 60-70% mixed race or identify of color incoming classes?
Every damn info session we attended this spring break the speaker sang poetic about having fewer than 25-30% identifying as Caucasian only.
Have they even thought how this sounds to the white Kidd who have been hearing “need not apply” for the past 3 years?
Diversity is an ideology in higher education. It is the new faith.
As it is, I find it funny some people believe the push to ban AA in at Harvard is white supremacy when it would only lead to even more Asians. Harvard has definitely increased the share of Asians in the student body due to pressure not to be so racist. So who is the real racist? White supremacists or Harvard?
Anonymous wrote:What about the crackers? Are we done with touring our 60-70% mixed race or identify of color incoming classes?
Every damn info session we attended this spring break the speaker sang poetic about having fewer than 25-30% identifying as Caucasian only.
Have they even thought how this sounds to the white Kidd who have been hearing “need not apply” for the past 3 years?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about the crackers? Are we done with touring our 60-70% mixed race or identify of color incoming classes?
Every damn info session we attended this spring break the speaker sang poetic about having fewer than 25-30% identifying as Caucasian only.
Have they even thought how this sounds to the white Kidd who have been hearing “need not apply” for the past 3 years?
Diversity is an ideology in higher education. It is the new faith.
As it is, I find it funny some people believe the push to ban AA in at Harvard is white supremacy when it would only lead to even more Asians. Harvard has definitely increased the share of Asians in the student body due to pressure not to be so racist. So who is the real racist? White supremacists or Harvard?
We all know after AA is banned that the next step will be to call for adjustments to the process to reduce overrepresented Asians. It’s always been about falling white dominance.
Asians will never overtake white dominance. We know their game. They want to kiss enough a$& to be white adjacent and then try to take over. And cut all the other nonwhite throats in the process. It will never happen. It’s called white supremacy for a reason, but we will let you keep kissing a$&.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about the crackers? Are we done with touring our 60-70% mixed race or identify of color incoming classes?
Every damn info session we attended this spring break the speaker sang poetic about having fewer than 25-30% identifying as Caucasian only.
Have they even thought how this sounds to the white Kidd who have been hearing “need not apply” for the past 3 years?
Diversity is an ideology in higher education. It is the new faith.
As it is, I find it funny some people believe the push to ban AA in at Harvard is white supremacy when it would only lead to even more Asians. Harvard has definitely increased the share of Asians in the student body due to pressure not to be so racist. So who is the real racist? White supremacists or Harvard?
We all know after AA is banned that the next step will be to call for adjustments to the process to reduce overrepresented Asians. It’s always been about falling white dominance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about the crackers? Are we done with touring our 60-70% mixed race or identify of color incoming classes?
Every damn info session we attended this spring break the speaker sang poetic about having fewer than 25-30% identifying as Caucasian only.
Have they even thought how this sounds to the white Kidd who have been hearing “need not apply” for the past 3 years?
Diversity is an ideology in higher education. It is the new faith.
As it is, I find it funny some people believe the push to ban AA in at Harvard is white supremacy when it would only lead to even more Asians. Harvard has definitely increased the share of Asians in the student body due to pressure not to be so racist. So who is the real racist? White supremacists or Harvard?