Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a parent of TJ senior and here is number I get so far:
3 Harvard
1 or 2 Yale
2 Princeton
4 or 5 MIT (all from REA)
1 S (maybe)
1 Columbia
2 Upenn
The real number maybe higher than this but definitely not much. Worst year in decade.
This is what I heard so far:
8 Harvard
6 Yale
9 Princeton
11 MIT
5 Stanford
8 Columbia
10 Upenn
18 Michigan
16 CMU
14 Chicago
15 Cornell
Added Michigan and some Virginia, California and North Carolina colleges.
Now the real destination numbers are out.
5 Harvard
1 Yale
4 Princeton
3 MIT
1 Stanford
1 Columbia
5 UPenn
10 Michigan
9 CMU
14 Chicago
7 Cornell
2 CIT
1 UCLA
2 UC Berkeley
6 Duke
7 UNC Chapel Hill
In Virginia,
44 UVA
24 William and Mary
23 VT
4 VCU
5 GMU
What about Brown and Dartmouth? I know at least 2 are going to each
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a parent of TJ senior and here is number I get so far:
3 Harvard
1 or 2 Yale
2 Princeton
4 or 5 MIT (all from REA)
1 S (maybe)
1 Columbia
2 Upenn
The real number maybe higher than this but definitely not much. Worst year in decade.
This is what I heard so far:
8 Harvard
6 Yale
9 Princeton
11 MIT
5 Stanford
8 Columbia
10 Upenn
18 Michigan
16 CMU
14 Chicago
15 Cornell
Added Michigan and some Virginia, California and North Carolina colleges.
Now the real destination numbers are out.
5 Harvard
1 Yale
4 Princeton
3 MIT
1 Stanford
1 Columbia
5 UPenn
10 Michigan
9 CMU
14 Chicago
7 Cornell
2 CIT
1 UCLA
2 UC Berkeley
6 Duke
7 UNC Chapel Hill
In Virginia,
44 UVA
24 William and Mary
23 VT
4 VCU
5 GMU
Anonymous wrote:the TJ process is way better since the changes.: previously it was mainly a bunch of kids who had been coached for 3-4 years and provided “insights” into the type of questions to expect on the test.
We are now seeing a well rounded class.
Is it perfect. No. But better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a parent of TJ senior and here is number I get so far:
3 Harvard
1 or 2 Yale
2 Princeton
4 or 5 MIT (all from REA)
1 S (maybe)
1 Columbia
2 Upenn
The real number maybe higher than this but definitely not much. Worst year in decade.
This is what I heard so far:
8 Harvard
6 Yale
9 Princeton
11 MIT
5 Stanford
8 Columbia
10 Upenn
18 Michigan
16 CMU
14 Chicago
15 Cornell
Added Michigan and some Virginia, California and North Carolina colleges.
Now the real destination numbers are out.
5 Harvard
1 Yale
4 Princeton
3 MIT
1 Stanford
1 Columbia
5 UPenn
10 Michigan
9 CMU
14 Chicago
7 Cornell
2 CIT
1 UCLA
2 UC Berkeley
6 Duke
7 UNC Chapel Hill
In Virginia,
44 UVA
24 William and Mary
23 VT
4 VCU
5 GMU
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a parent of TJ senior and here is number I get so far:
3 Harvard
1 or 2 Yale
2 Princeton
4 or 5 MIT (all from REA)
1 S (maybe)
1 Columbia
2 Upenn
The real number maybe higher than this but definitely not much. Worst year in decade.
This is what I heard so far:
8 Harvard
6 Yale
9 Princeton
11 MIT
5 Stanford
8 Columbia
10 Upenn
18 Michigan
16 CMU
14 Chicago
15 Cornell
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a parent of TJ senior and here is number I get so far:
3 Harvard
1 or 2 Yale
2 Princeton
4 or 5 MIT (all from REA)
1 S (maybe)
1 Columbia
2 Upenn
The real number maybe higher than this but definitely not much. Worst year in decade.
This is what I heard so far:
8 Harvard
6 Yale
9 Princeton
11 MIT
5 Stanford
8 Columbia
10 Upenn
18 Michigan
16 CMU
14 Chicago
15 Cornell
Anonymous wrote:the TJ process is way better since the changes.: previously it was mainly a bunch of kids who had been coached for 3-4 years and provided “insights” into the type of questions to expect on the test.
We are now seeing a well rounded class.
Is it perfect. No. But better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Class of 2023 at TJ was admitted under the old admission system. FYI.
Thank goodness they've adjusted the system. I hope it pays off for everyone, and it very well might given the recent focus by college AOs, though I tend not to fully support such tracked education with tax dollars.
The students admitted under the old process looked good on paper mainly because of expensive prep and test buying but can't measure up with those admitted under the new process because of skill and aptitude. This is just being reflected in the college admission results.
The new process hasn't carried thru to senior class yet. You are so desperate to spread your talking points, that you forgot what you said on this topic before- that the old process admits will do better on SATs because they are better at test-taking than the new process admits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Class of 2023 at TJ was admitted under the old admission system. FYI.
Thank goodness they've adjusted the system. I hope it pays off for everyone, and it very well might given the recent focus by college AOs, though I tend not to fully support such tracked education with tax dollars.
The students admitted under the old process looked good on paper mainly because of expensive prep and test buying but can't measure up with those admitted under the new process because of skill and aptitude. This is just being reflected in the college admission results.
The new process hasn't carried thru to senior class yet. You are so desperate to spread your talking points, that you forgot what you said on this topic before- that the old process admits will do better on SATs because they are better at test-taking than the new process admits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Class of 2023 at TJ was admitted under the old admission system. FYI.
Thank goodness they've adjusted the system. I hope it pays off for everyone, and it very well might given the recent focus by college AOs, though I tend not to fully support such tracked education with tax dollars.
The students admitted under the old process looked good on paper mainly because of expensive prep and test buying but can't measure up with those admitted under the new process because of skill and aptitude. This is just being reflected in the college admission results.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Class of 2023 at TJ was admitted under the old admission system. FYI.
Thank goodness they've adjusted the system. I hope it pays off for everyone, and it very well might given the recent focus by college AOs, though I tend not to fully support such tracked education with tax dollars.
The students admitted under the old process looked good on paper mainly because of expensive prep and test buying but can't measure up with those admitted under the new process because of skill and aptitude. This is just being reflected in the college admission results.
More garbage. TJ kids are scientists, governors, tech billionaires, etc. The results have been spectacular. To listen to you, TJ kids scored well on SATs but failed in real life - but nothing could be further from the truth. The old TJ admissions policies did a fabulous job picking future superstars.
Stop trying to fix what isn't broken.
It was a school that was supposed to serve a whole region and ended up drawing the vast majority of students from a handful of middle schools. It was broken
Anonymous wrote:the TJ process is way better since the changes.: previously it was mainly a bunch of kids who had been coached for 3-4 years and provided “insights” into the type of questions to expect on the test.
We are now seeing a well rounded class.
Is it perfect. No. But better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Class of 2023 at TJ was admitted under the old admission system. FYI.
Thank goodness they've adjusted the system. I hope it pays off for everyone, and it very well might given the recent focus by college AOs, though I tend not to fully support such tracked education with tax dollars.
The students admitted under the old process looked good on paper mainly because of expensive prep and test buying but can't measure up with those admitted under the new process because of skill and aptitude. This is just being reflected in the college admission results.
More garbage. TJ kids are scientists, governors, tech billionaires, etc. The results have been spectacular. To listen to you, TJ kids scored well on SATs but failed in real life - but nothing could be further from the truth. The old TJ admissions policies did a fabulous job picking future superstars.
Stop trying to fix what isn't broken.