Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination in hiring based on religion. Just an FYI as many of you gleefully post you discriminate against Christian university grads.

Thankfully, Christians attend a variety of universities. Nice try though. Don’t choose to go to a controversial university.

The bigotry, for example, against Liberty Univ grads is without a question based on their perceived religious beliefs. Nice try!

Lol no. Google their “biology” curriculum. They use workbooks.

The intent has nothing to do with a textbook. It's the religion. This post hoc rationalization would be transparent in litigation.

FCPS has no books according to this thread. Maybe universities shouldn't take them. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1111832.page

College name is not a protected class. If it is, every Radford or Salisbury student, ever, should sue McKinsey & Company for systemic discrimination.

It's the practice of not hiring based on religion that is prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Getting to that intent is what discovery of things like emails, texts, and depositions is for.

Where are you getting this from? I’ll hire a student of any religion who attended any college BUT Liberty. No discrimination there.

You don’t think you’d have a disparate impact issue?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harvard. Entitled, obnoxious, self-important but not actually impressive. I don't want to work with that attitude or lack of professionalism-they turn people off. Why hire someone that alienates everyone else? Obviously it isn't just Harvard but 100% of the people from there have fit that behavioral mold.

The people who can afford to hire Harvard grads are just as obnoxious and self-important, so it works out.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harvard. Entitled, obnoxious, self-important but not actually impressive. I don't want to work with that attitude or lack of professionalism-they turn people off. Why hire someone that alienates everyone else? Obviously it isn't just Harvard but 100% of the people from there have fit that behavioral mold.

The people who can afford to hire Harvard grads are just as obnoxious and self-important, so it works out.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination in hiring based on religion. Just an FYI as many of you gleefully post you discriminate against Christian university grads.

Thankfully, Christians attend a variety of universities. Nice try though. Don’t choose to go to a controversial university.

The bigotry, for example, against Liberty Univ grads is without a question based on their perceived religious beliefs. Nice try!

Lol no. Google their “biology” curriculum. They use workbooks.

The intent has nothing to do with a textbook. It's the religion. This post hoc rationalization would be transparent in litigation.

FCPS has no books according to this thread. Maybe universities shouldn't take them. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1111832.page

College name is not a protected class. If it is, every Radford or Salisbury student, ever, should sue McKinsey & Company for systemic discrimination.

It's the practice of not hiring based on religion that is prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Getting to that intent is what discovery of things like emails, texts, and depositions is for.

Where are you getting this from? I’ll hire a student of any religion who attended any college BUT Liberty. No discrimination there.

Anonymous wrote:Harvard. Entitled, obnoxious, self-important but not actually impressive. I don't want to work with that attitude or lack of professionalism-they turn people off. Why hire someone that alienates everyone else? Obviously it isn't just Harvard but 100% of the people from there have fit that behavioral mold.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Religious scam unis, like Liberty.

Lots of students attend Liberty and other religious schools for cost and convenience. They avoid religious aspects and focus on rest of the education. It would be unfair to discriminate against them. If any, they add some intellectual diversity to these schools and develop good insight about what's going on there. They can become reformers, when given a chance.

Well, their career center needs an upgrade. The resumes I see coming out of places like Liberty might as well be a handwritten scrawl on a napkin. Pure trash. I'm willing to keep an open mind, but again, you need to compete.

Well, if your judgment is based on bad resumes, that’s valid.

I probably do have my biases against these schools, but I've also never seen a great resume from one so it's not exactly discrimination either. They need to do better. They're not sending out their graduates into the world appearing prepared.

We can’t help sometimes the biases we carry, but we can help how we act on them. If they send bad resumes, it doesn’t matter where they went to school.

I worked with 2 people early in my career that went to the University of Central Florida. They were both bigots and both useless at work. One was a female minority and one was a white male. The white male was bigoted against me personally. I was friendly with the Mom of the other and later learned the daughter was pretty racist against her boss….because I went to work for him.

As much as I disliked these people and thought they were both unskilled and nasty, I would not assume all graduates from that school are reflective of their example, particularly so many years later.

Conversely, I’ve had a couple fantastic coworkers who went to Mason. One was clearly not well educated in the subject matter but wow did he make up for it in work ethic and interpersonal skill. I now have a good opinion of people who went to Mason, because I feel the school may not be great but it attracts students interested in getting their work done and starting a career. It’s been my experience. I’m sure some people graduate from there and are terrible to work with, and also don’t have the education. But, my bias is positive. It works in all directions. Each applicant should have a set of qualifications that go into the consideration. It should never be one factor.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who uses "ahem" or "cough, cough" or states their pronouns.

Lots of great people with degrees from University of Phoenix, BYU, Hillsdale, even Oberlin. But never, never, never, never, anyone from Colorado College.

What is wrong with Colorado College?