Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Current grade: 2
NNAT/CoGAT: 149/139
GBRS (if known): all four consistently
School or center: westgate
In/not in: IN
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NNAT 119 Cogat 132
Mclean pyramid / Center school / High SIS
GBRS unknown
In
So my child can be an example that the committe is not
focusing only on the nnat / cogat scores anymore?
It is actually an example of the NEW "fools in schools" program promoted by Fairfax countyhaycock level 4 aap is NOW gen-ed quality
My "fool's" scores were even lower and she is completely thriving in AAP and easily keeping up with all the "geniuses" in her class. If you don't like AAP and think it's like gen-ed there are plenty of private school stress factories that will take your money.
True,nNo wonder your kid is thriving, with the whole AAP program diluted with the admission of low scoring average kids. With a gen-ed level AAP class, the kid sure is a rock star. To prevent such nonsense, Mensa and Davidson's gifted programs don't even admit such low scoring kids to their gifted programs.
I'm not buying it. My kid's in AAP. Didn't score high at all for whatever reason. I know there are probably some kids in her class that did score very high on the tests - it's a large center. The class is super competitive with each other, and she is constantly coming home saying she had the best or second-best score on tests. They are all taking the same test - I asked. How does it work out that my stupid kid is beating out your genius? Sure, maybe the curriculum is watered down (whatever), but they are all taking the same test. Is your genius missing answers on purpose to make my child feel better about herself? I doubt it. Perhaps-ish those IQ tests don't mean much in the grand scheme of things.
Anonymous wrote:Current grade: 2
NNAT/CoGAT: 149/139
GBRS (if known): all four consistently
School or center: westgate
In/not in: IN
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NNAT 119 Cogat 132
Mclean pyramid / Center school / High SIS
GBRS unknown
In
So my child can be an example that the committe is not
focusing only on the nnat / cogat scores anymore?
It is actually an example of the NEW "fools in schools" program promoted by Fairfax countyhaycock level 4 aap is NOW gen-ed quality
My "fool's" scores were even lower and she is completely thriving in AAP and easily keeping up with all the "geniuses" in her class. If you don't like AAP and think it's like gen-ed there are plenty of private school stress factories that will take your money.
True,nNo wonder your kid is thriving, with the whole AAP program diluted with the admission of low scoring average kids. With a gen-ed level AAP class, the kid sure is a rock star. To prevent such nonsense, Mensa and Davidson's gifted programs don't even admit such low scoring kids to their gifted programs.
Anonymous wrote:The problem is that AAP tries to wear too many hats, and as a result does none of them particularly well. Is it a gifted program serving gifted kids? Is it an accelerated program serving bright kids 1 year above grade level? Is it a program for well behaved, non disruptive kids who are motivated to learn? Is it a talent development program for kids who otherwise might not be given a chance? No one seems to know.
For the highly gifted kids, the problem is not that FCPS is letting a lot of above average, not especially advanced kids into AAP. The problem is that they're false advertising the program. The party line is that AAP is for kids who have needs that cannot be met in a regular classroom, and the teachers will differentiate upward to meet the needs of the kids who are far ahead of their peers. The reality is that the program is going to deliver a mildly accelerated curriculum, and the teachers will be too busy with their other duties to create extensions for one child. If a kid is multiple grade levels ahead and has an IQ above 140, that kid should attend private school or be homeschooled. FCPS does not have the bandwidth to meet the needs of children like that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NNAT 119 Cogat 132
Mclean pyramid / Center school / High SIS
GBRS unknown
In
So my child can be an example that the committe is not
focusing only on the nnat / cogat scores anymore?
It is actually an example of the NEW "fools in schools" program promoted by Fairfax countyhaycock level 4 aap is NOW gen-ed quality
My "fool's" scores were even lower and she is completely thriving in AAP and easily keeping up with all the "geniuses" in her class. If you don't like AAP and think it's like gen-ed there are plenty of private school stress factories that will take your money.
True,nNo wonder your kid is thriving, with the whole AAP program diluted with the admission of low scoring average kids. With a gen-ed level AAP class, the kid sure is a rock star. To prevent such nonsense, Mensa and Davidson's gifted programs don't even admit such low scoring kids to their gifted programs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NNAT 119 Cogat 132
Mclean pyramid / Center school / High SIS
GBRS unknown
In
So my child can be an example that the committe is not
focusing only on the nnat / cogat scores anymore?
It is actually an example of the NEW "fools in schools" program promoted by Fairfax countyhaycock level 4 aap is NOW gen-ed quality
My "fool's" scores were even lower and she is completely thriving in AAP and easily keeping up with all the "geniuses" in her class. If you don't like AAP and think it's like gen-ed there are plenty of private school stress factories that will take your money.
Anonymous wrote:The problem is that AAP tries to wear too many hats, and as a result does none of them particularly well. Is it a gifted program serving gifted kids? Is it an accelerated program serving bright kids 1 year above grade level? Is it a program for well behaved, non disruptive kids who are motivated to learn? Is it a talent development program for kids who otherwise might not be given a chance? No one seems to know.
For the highly gifted kids, the problem is not that FCPS is letting a lot of above average, not especially advanced kids into AAP. The problem is that they're false advertising the program. The party line is that AAP is for kids who have needs that cannot be met in a regular classroom, and the teachers will differentiate upward to meet the needs of the kids who are far ahead of their peers. The reality is that the program is going to deliver a mildly accelerated curriculum, and the teachers will be too busy with their other duties to create extensions for one child. If a kid is multiple grade levels ahead and has an IQ above 140, that kid should attend private school or be homeschooled. FCPS does not have the bandwidth to meet the needs of children like that.
Anonymous wrote:I would like to see Advanced Math and Advanced LA, like they do with LII services (it is reading, math or both.) The Advanced Math track leads to parents who want kids with more challenging LA curriculum to push for LIV services even when their kid is not strong in math. If they had Advanced Math and Advanced LA they could have a Math and Science class and a LA and Social Studies class, move the kids into the appropriate groups and not even worry about LIV classes. Kids would be able to stay at their base schools and receive instruction in the areas that they need it.
My kid is more of a math kid, he finds Advanced Math easy. He is strong in LA but more higher reading group and not grade levels ahead in LA. He is in LIV, we deferred in favor of his LI program, so the Advanced Math break down has worked for him. I think he would have been fine at the Center with the LA component but I suspect the Advanced Math and regular LA is fine for him. We have a friend who deferred for her kid because the Advanced Math would have been too much but they really wanted the Advanced LA and Level III does not really make up that difference.
Anonymous wrote:The problem is that AAP tries to wear too many hats, and as a result does none of them particularly well. Is it a gifted program serving gifted kids? Is it an accelerated program serving bright kids 1 year above grade level? Is it a program for well behaved, non disruptive kids who are motivated to learn? Is it a talent development program for kids who otherwise might not be given a chance? No one seems to know.
For the highly gifted kids, the problem is not that FCPS is letting a lot of above average, not especially advanced kids into AAP. The problem is that they're false advertising the program. The party line is that AAP is for kids who have needs that cannot be met in a regular classroom, and the teachers will differentiate upward to meet the needs of the kids who are far ahead of their peers. The reality is that the program is going to deliver a mildly accelerated curriculum, and the teachers will be too busy with their other duties to create extensions for one child. If a kid is multiple grade levels ahead and has an IQ above 140, that kid should attend private school or be homeschooled. FCPS does not have the bandwidth to meet the needs of children like that.