Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Men who decide that fatherhood isn't for them and leave women holding the bag is a problem.

Women who decide to have children and can raise them isn't a problem.

+1

This is a man problem.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i don’t see it as a problem. The problem is the lack of money and lack of support single mothers are given.

Single mothers are demonized because they are women.

If most single parents were men they would be given support and accolades.

Misogyny is a lot deeper than people realize.

I think people who think like you are the ones who devalue the intelligence and ability of women to make good decisions. Why don't we encourage women to think ahead, plan, get an education, and consider the kind of person who would make a faithful, kind, stable, and loving spouse/ father of their children?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Men who decide that fatherhood isn't for them and leave women holding the bag is a problem.

Women who decide to have children and can raise them isn't a problem.

+1

This is a man problem.

Men can get pregnant too, hater.

How?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All male newborns DNA should be in a data bank and every child born to a single woman DNA should be checked against DNA data bank. Then father is found and is jailed for nine months--same as gestation period--uoon release, he is responsible for child to age 22.

Let me guess. You're a "liberal" 😀🤣😂

Unlike conservatives, liberals believe in personal responsibility. That includes fathers taking responsibility for their kids.

Really? Lady, you vote for the party that glorifies fatherless upbringing!

Funny, almost every liberal I know has been in a long, happy marriage. Only exception was the Catholic aunt who divorced the abusive drug addict she had to marry when he knocked her up back in the 1980s.

The conservatives I know? Whew. Like a Springer show. Punching down is such a favored past time because their lives are such a joke. Kids are a mess. Multiple baby mammas, drugs everywhere. Real family values crowd.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Men who decide that fatherhood isn't for them and leave women holding the bag is a problem.

Women who decide to have children and can raise them isn't a problem.

+1

This is a man problem.

Men can get pregnant too, hater.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All male newborns DNA should be in a data bank and every child born to a single woman DNA should be checked against DNA data bank. Then father is found and is jailed for nine months--same as gestation period--uoon release, he is responsible for child to age 22.

Let me guess. You're a "liberal" 😀🤣😂

Unlike conservatives, liberals believe in personal responsibility. That includes fathers taking responsibility for their kids.

Really? Lady, you vote for the party that glorifies fatherless upbringing!

Funny, almost every liberal I know has been in a long, happy marriage. Only exception was the Catholic aunt who divorced the abusive drug addict she had to marry when he knocked her up back in the 1980s.

The conservatives I know? Whew. Like a Springer show. Punching down is such a favored past time because their lives are such a joke. Kids are a mess. Multiple baby mammas, drugs everywhere. Real family values crowd.

Where do you live honey?

I am not this pp, but same situation. My GOP family members are all divorced and living in the deep south. Almost all now claim to be "born again" evangelical but they don't marry their midlife partners, which is just as well, because most only last for a few years before they move on. Kids are unfortunately on the same path and not inclined to marry. Fortunately family members have stayed away from drugs, but my old friends haven't been so lucky--theyvare also mostly divorced, living paycheck to paycheck, and doing drugs when they can afford them.

My sibling and I got out, went to college, became liberal democrats eventually, married our spouses in our 20s, and are still married to our original spouses 20+ years later.

PP, and same here except my family is in a declining NE town. My neighbors in my UMC, highly liberal suburb are very strong in the family values department. We don’t need to have the government force it on us because we chose it for ourselves. Apparently conservatives can’t do the right thing unless some Daddy is forcing them. Shows a real deficit of character I think.

Anonymous wrote:i don’t see it as a problem. The problem is the lack of money and lack of support single mothers are given.

Single mothers are demonized because they are women.

If most single parents were men they would be given support and accolades.

Misogyny is a lot deeper than people realize.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All male newborns DNA should be in a data bank and every child born to a single woman DNA should be checked against DNA data bank. Then father is found and is jailed for nine months--same as gestation period--uoon release, he is responsible for child to age 22.

Let me guess. You're a "liberal" 😀🤣😂

Unlike conservatives, liberals believe in personal responsibility. That includes fathers taking responsibility for their kids.

Really? Lady, you vote for the party that glorifies fatherless upbringing!

Funny, almost every liberal I know has been in a long, happy marriage. Only exception was the Catholic aunt who divorced the abusive drug addict she had to marry when he knocked her up back in the 1980s.

The conservatives I know? Whew. Like a Springer show. Punching down is such a favored past time because their lives are such a joke. Kids are a mess. Multiple baby mammas, drugs everywhere. Real family values crowd.

Where do you live honey?

I am not this pp, but same situation. My GOP family members are all divorced and living in the deep south. Almost all now claim to be "born again" evangelical but they don't marry their midlife partners, which is just as well, because most only last for a few years before they move on. Kids are unfortunately on the same path and not inclined to marry. Fortunately family members have stayed away from drugs, but my old friends haven't been so lucky--theyvare also mostly divorced, living paycheck to paycheck, and doing drugs when they can afford them.

My sibling and I got out, went to college, became liberal democrats eventually, married our spouses in our 20s, and are still married to our original spouses 20+ years later.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poligamy.

It's time to add poligamy to the LGBT++ family. We are all adults, should be free to choose to marry two husbands three wives and four non-binaries.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Men who decide that fatherhood isn't for them and leave women holding the bag is a problem.

Women who decide to have children and can raise them isn't a problem.

+1

This is a man problem.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Men who decide that fatherhood isn't for them and leave women holding the bag is a problem.

Women who decide to have children and can raise them isn't a problem.

+1

This is a man problem.

Anonymous wrote:Men who decide that fatherhood isn't for them and leave women holding the bag is a problem.

Women who decide to have children and can raise them isn't a problem.

Anonymous wrote:Might be useful to remember that many single mothers are only single on paper, for tax and benefits purposes. Eliminate these and the rates will drop. Those who are truly single will stay single no matter what; the rest will tie the knot, most likely

Anonymous wrote:Poligamy.