Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He had just been released from jail on a parole violation. He wasn’t stealing food or diapers for his 2 children. Instead, he was stealing designer sunglasses. I hope that these poor policeman don’t lose their jobs.

I hope they go to prison. You don’t shoot unarmed people for shoplifting, period. At a minimum they should be fired for incompetence.

You are everything that is wrong with our criminal justice system and the reason why crime of all types continues to increase in this country. He wasn’t shot because he was shoplifting and he wasn’t a victim. He was shot, because when the police tried to apprehend for shoplifting, he ran. He was a lifelong criminal with a long and violent history. The police shouldn’t have to risk their lives chasing him into the woods only to have him pull out a weapon and kill them. No sympathy for this POS.

Spoken like somebody who has no idea how law enforcement works. There was no threat to life. The Chief of Police said they have no located a weapon. The man was running from the cops who coincidentally keeping killing unarmed people.

With the increase in gun violence at Tysons, with the recent armed carjackings in Fairfax County, I expect there's a push to come down hard on crime here. DC, Maryland, Loudoun County may be fine with skyrocketing crime statistics but we are not.

Go crime somewhere else.

+1
I hope this acts as a deterrent

It won’t.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fairfax does not have any foot pursuit policy. It has been recommended in the past. Now may be a good time to develop one.

For those asking what he shoplifted, it was a pair of designer sunglasses.

It appears he had no weapon.

So just let them run off with the stuff?

In every retail job I've worked, that is the policy.

And now look where we are.

If more criminals were shot for stealing will stealing slow down?

Yeah. Enforcement is enforcement. Lack of enforcement is lack of enforcement.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Barbaric? Go to the other thread about stealing. It should be fine to just walk in to a store and take stuff, amirite?

It's really not asking too much to ask police not to summarily execute unarmed shoplifting suspects pre-trial.

Imagine if IRS agents did this because you screwed up on your taxes by $600. Is that also OK?

Agents of government should not be executing people in public. Police are agents of government.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He had just been released from jail on a parole violation. He wasn’t stealing food or diapers for his 2 children. Instead, he was stealing designer sunglasses. I hope that these poor policeman don’t lose their jobs.

I hope they go to prison. You don’t shoot unarmed people for shoplifting, period. At a minimum they should be fired for incompetence.

You are everything that is wrong with our criminal justice system and the reason why crime of all types continues to increase in this country. He wasn’t shot because he was shoplifting and he wasn’t a victim. He was shot, because when the police tried to apprehend for shoplifting, he ran. He was a lifelong criminal with a long and violent history. The police shouldn’t have to risk their lives chasing him into the woods only to have him pull out a weapon and kill them. No sympathy for this POS.

Spoken like somebody who has no idea how law enforcement works. There was no threat to life. The Chief of Police said they have no located a weapon. The man was running from the cops who coincidentally keeping killing unarmed people.

With the increase in gun violence at Tysons, with the recent armed carjackings in Fairfax County, I expect there's a push to come down hard on crime here. DC, Maryland, Loudoun County may be fine with skyrocketing crime statistics but we are not.

Go crime somewhere else.

+1
I hope this acts as a deterrent

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He had just been released from jail on a parole violation. He wasn’t stealing food or diapers for his 2 children. Instead, he was stealing designer sunglasses. I hope that these poor policeman don’t lose their jobs.

I hope they go to prison. You don’t shoot unarmed people for shoplifting, period. At a minimum they should be fired for incompetence.

You are everything that is wrong with our criminal justice system and the reason why crime of all types continues to increase in this country. He wasn’t shot because he was shoplifting and he wasn’t a victim. He was shot, because when the police tried to apprehend for shoplifting, he ran. He was a lifelong criminal with a long and violent history. The police shouldn’t have to risk their lives chasing him into the woods only to have him pull out a weapon and kill them. No sympathy for this POS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He had just been released from jail on a parole violation. He wasn’t stealing food or diapers for his 2 children. Instead, he was stealing designer sunglasses. I hope that these poor policeman don’t lose their jobs.

I hope they go to prison. You don’t shoot unarmed people for shoplifting, period. At a minimum they should be fired for incompetence.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Barbaric? Go to the other thread about stealing. It should be fine to just walk in to a store and take stuff, amirite?

It's really not asking too much to ask police not to summarily execute unarmed shoplifting suspects pre-trial.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Barbaric? Go to the other thread about stealing. It should be fine to just walk in to a store and take stuff, amirite?

It's really not asking too much to ask police not to summarily execute unarmed shoplifting suspects pre-trial.

Anonymous wrote:
Barbaric? Go to the other thread about stealing. It should be fine to just walk in to a store and take stuff, amirite?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shooting someone RUNNING AWAY (and, even worse, unarmed) because they stole something (I think it was designer sunglasses) is just barbaric. It's not done in other civilized countries. You might as well say that a human life is worth less than designer sunglasses. You think other countries don't have shoplifters? You think that executing shoplifters is routine elsewhere?

PS. My teen told me shoplifting from stores like Sephora and Claire's was rampant among MS girls in her NOVA public MS when and was probably the reason she and friends were followed around when they shopped in groups.

Barbaric? Go to the other thread about stealing. It should be fine to just walk in to a store and take stuff, amirite?

It's never okay to steal. But you shouldn't have to be executed for it. If you think that's acceptable, move to Saudi Arabia where you can witness public mailings (cutting off of hands) of thieves or teletransport ourself to 18th century England where thieves and pickpockets were hung to death.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shooting someone RUNNING AWAY (and, even worse, unarmed) because they stole something (I think it was designer sunglasses) is just barbaric. It's not done in other civilized countries. You might as well say that a human life is worth less than designer sunglasses. You think other countries don't have shoplifters? You think that executing shoplifters is routine elsewhere?

PS. My teen told me shoplifting from stores like Sephora and Claire's was rampant among MS girls in her NOVA public MS when and was probably the reason she and friends were followed around when they shopped in groups.

Barbaric? Go to the other thread about stealing. It should be fine to just walk in to a store and take stuff, amirite?

Anonymous wrote:So much black and white concrete thinking. He shouldn’t have been shot. Conclusion by some people: “oh so you are ok with criminals getting away with crimes?” Ummm no. I think we should charge criminals with theft, even for small things. You know what else I believe in? Due process.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shooting someone RUNNING AWAY (and, even worse, unarmed) because they stole something (I think it was designer sunglasses) is just barbaric. It's not done in other civilized countries. You might as well say that a human life is worth less than designer sunglasses. You think other countries don't have shoplifters? You think that executing shoplifters is routine elsewhere?

PS. My teen told me shoplifting from stores like Sephora and Claire's was rampant among MS girls in her NOVA public MS when and was probably the reason she and friends were followed around when they shopped in groups.

Barbaric? Go to the other thread about stealing. It should be fine to just walk in to a store and take stuff, amirite?

Anonymous wrote:Shooting someone RUNNING AWAY (and, even worse, unarmed) because they stole something (I think it was designer sunglasses) is just barbaric. It's not done in other civilized countries. You might as well say that a human life is worth less than designer sunglasses. You think other countries don't have shoplifters? You think that executing shoplifters is routine elsewhere?

PS. My teen told me shoplifting from stores like Sephora and Claire's was rampant among MS girls in her NOVA public MS when and was probably the reason she and friends were followed around when they shopped in groups.