Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Being gay or Lesbian is not a "sexual preference." It is sexual orientation. It is the not something you choose. I have a gay son who is very upset at the way labels are being tossed around. A cis het girl who doesn't like to wear skirts is not "non-binary" just because she uses they/them pronouns three days a week. A cis het guy is not "gay" just because he announces he is "sapiosexual" (a microlabel that means he is attracted to someone's intellect vs. their appearance). A kid isn't "trans" if they just announce they are trans but have no plans to change their assigned sex to match their gender identity. He said that most of the kids he knows who are claiming to be part of the gay community or chasing their pronouns are "straight kids who are desperate for attention. They tend to be very progressive politically and want to be part of an oppressed group." He and two of his gay male friends fear that this will erase all the work that gay people have done to find acceptance and understanding over the past 50 years. Instead, "gay" is becoming a catchall term not related to male homosexuality and (straight) people are using it as a lifestyle "choice" or "preference" vs. a sexual orientation that cannot be changed.
It's really wrong for someone to claim to be LGBT when they are cishet. You don't get some award in life for being queer. It just makes everything more difficult. I think most of these people will eventually stop identifying as queer and move on with their lives as straight cisgender people.
Why? Of course it's not really wrong for them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Being gay or Lesbian is not a "sexual preference." It is sexual orientation. It is the not something you choose. I have a gay son who is very upset at the way labels are being tossed around. A cis het girl who doesn't like to wear skirts is not "non-binary" just because she uses they/them pronouns three days a week. A cis het guy is not "gay" just because he announces he is "sapiosexual" (a microlabel that means he is attracted to someone's intellect vs. their appearance). A kid isn't "trans" if they just announce they are trans but have no plans to change their assigned sex to match their gender identity. He said that most of the kids he knows who are claiming to be part of the gay community or chasing their pronouns are "straight kids who are desperate for attention. They tend to be very progressive politically and want to be part of an oppressed group." He and two of his gay male friends fear that this will erase all the work that gay people have done to find acceptance and understanding over the past 50 years. Instead, "gay" is becoming a catchall term not related to male homosexuality and (straight) people are using it as a lifestyle "choice" or "preference" vs. a sexual orientation that cannot be changed.
Clearly it's both. And while your DC's jealousy of his identity being usurped by fakers is natural, it's not right. Kids trying on a different identity for a while will not harm the acceptance of "actually" gay people. It might upset the oldsters such as posters on DCUM but kids are genuinely inclusive now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Being gay or Lesbian is not a "sexual preference." It is sexual orientation. It is the not something you choose. I have a gay son who is very upset at the way labels are being tossed around. A cis het girl who doesn't like to wear skirts is not "non-binary" just because she uses they/them pronouns three days a week. A cis het guy is not "gay" just because he announces he is "sapiosexual" (a microlabel that means he is attracted to someone's intellect vs. their appearance). A kid isn't "trans" if they just announce they are trans but have no plans to change their assigned sex to match their gender identity. He said that most of the kids he knows who are claiming to be part of the gay community or chasing their pronouns are "straight kids who are desperate for attention. They tend to be very progressive politically and want to be part of an oppressed group." He and two of his gay male friends fear that this will erase all the work that gay people have done to find acceptance and understanding over the past 50 years. Instead, "gay" is becoming a catchall term not related to male homosexuality and (straight) people are using it as a lifestyle "choice" or "preference" vs. a sexual orientation that cannot be changed.
It's really wrong for someone to claim to be LGBT when they are cishet. You don't get some award in life for being queer. It just makes everything more difficult. I think most of these people will eventually stop identifying as queer and move on with their lives as straight cisgender people.
Anonymous wrote:Being gay or Lesbian is not a "sexual preference." It is sexual orientation. It is the not something you choose. I have a gay son who is very upset at the way labels are being tossed around. A cis het girl who doesn't like to wear skirts is not "non-binary" just because she uses they/them pronouns three days a week. A cis het guy is not "gay" just because he announces he is "sapiosexual" (a microlabel that means he is attracted to someone's intellect vs. their appearance). A kid isn't "trans" if they just announce they are trans but have no plans to change their assigned sex to match their gender identity. He said that most of the kids he knows who are claiming to be part of the gay community or chasing their pronouns are "straight kids who are desperate for attention. They tend to be very progressive politically and want to be part of an oppressed group." He and two of his gay male friends fear that this will erase all the work that gay people have done to find acceptance and understanding over the past 50 years. Instead, "gay" is becoming a catchall term not related to male homosexuality and (straight) people are using it as a lifestyle "choice" or "preference" vs. a sexual orientation that cannot be changed.
Anonymous wrote:Being gay or Lesbian is not a "sexual preference." It is sexual orientation. It is the not something you choose. I have a gay son who is very upset at the way labels are being tossed around. A cis het girl who doesn't like to wear skirts is not "non-binary" just because she uses they/them pronouns three days a week. A cis het guy is not "gay" just because he announces he is "sapiosexual" (a microlabel that means he is attracted to someone's intellect vs. their appearance). A kid isn't "trans" if they just announce they are trans but have no plans to change their assigned sex to match their gender identity. He said that most of the kids he knows who are claiming to be part of the gay community or chasing their pronouns are "straight kids who are desperate for attention. They tend to be very progressive politically and want to be part of an oppressed group." He and two of his gay male friends fear that this will erase all the work that gay people have done to find acceptance and understanding over the past 50 years. Instead, "gay" is becoming a catchall term not related to male homosexuality and (straight) people are using it as a lifestyle "choice" or "preference" vs. a sexual orientation that cannot be changed.
Anonymous wrote:Being gay or Lesbian is not a "sexual preference." It is sexual orientation. It is the not something you choose. I have a gay son who is very upset at the way labels are being tossed around. A cis het girl who doesn't like to wear skirts is not "non-binary" just because she uses they/them pronouns three days a week. A cis het guy is not "gay" just because he announces he is "sapiosexual" (a microlabel that means he is attracted to someone's intellect vs. their appearance). A kid isn't "trans" if they just announce they are trans but have no plans to change their assigned sex to match their gender identity. He said that most of the kids he knows who are claiming to be part of the gay community or chasing their pronouns are "straight kids who are desperate for attention. They tend to be very progressive politically and want to be part of an oppressed group." He and two of his gay male friends fear that this will erase all the work that gay people have done to find acceptance and understanding over the past 50 years. Instead, "gay" is becoming a catchall term not related to male homosexuality and (straight) people are using it as a lifestyle "choice" or "preference" vs. a sexual orientation that cannot be changed.
Anonymous wrote:Just curious, at my child’s large (public) middle school there seem to be so many kids that are identifying as gay/bi. As in maybe the majority, or close. It seems very commonplace. Is this the case at your child’s middle school? Seeing as adults that identify LGBQ is a much smaller percentage, what is going on with the middle school crowd?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seeing this is sixth grade and to be honest, sixth grade boys can be pretty unappealing, so it could just be looking at the alternative, realizing, "I'm not attracted to any of them" and the girls come out the winner.
I was thinking the same thing. 6-8th grade boys are shorter than the girls, have not hit the throws of puberty, stink and generally look like little boys. As where half the girls look like grown women. I can see why they aren’t attracted to the boys as assume their are bi since their girl friends are appealing
Right but this has already been true.
Right, but the default used to just be, the boys are still gross. Now it is, go I'm probably be bi/gay
+1 Or asexual, which just gets me. I am all for some asexual 13 year olds!
That reminds me of a conversation I overheard in line at six flag this summer. Girls were pressuring their friend in whether she was gay or straight. She said she didn't know so she must be asexual. I think they were about ten years old.
Kids definitely pressure each other. Over everything.
Only now, they pressure each other over their sexual preferences, even though they are many years away from actually having sex or understanding what it really is.
Anonymous wrote:
My daughter is in 9th grade and has 6 trans male friends. Two are considering hormones and dress as male. All 6 have taken male names and male pronouns, but 4 dress like females ('90s punkish) with plaid kilts, fishnets, band tees, and lots of rainbow merch. The kids get angry if people misgender them, even if they present as female. They also say things like, "I have a boyfriend and since I'm male, that means he's gay! But he said he's not gay because he's into my female body—but I'm male!" It is pretty confusing. I think a lot of kids are trying things on to see what fits and they'll figure it out eventually. But that is a large number of trans kids in one grade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seeing this is sixth grade and to be honest, sixth grade boys can be pretty unappealing, so it could just be looking at the alternative, realizing, "I'm not attracted to any of them" and the girls come out the winner.
I was thinking the same thing. 6-8th grade boys are shorter than the girls, have not hit the throws of puberty, stink and generally look like little boys. As where half the girls look like grown women. I can see why they aren’t attracted to the boys as assume their are bi since their girl friends are appealing
Right but this has already been true.
Right, but the default used to just be, the boys are still gross. Now it is, go I'm probably be bi/gay
+1 Or asexual, which just gets me. I am all for some asexual 13 year olds!
That reminds me of a conversation I overheard in line at six flag this summer. Girls were pressuring their friend in whether she was gay or straight. She said she didn't know so she must be asexual. I think they were about ten years old.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seeing this is sixth grade and to be honest, sixth grade boys can be pretty unappealing, so it could just be looking at the alternative, realizing, "I'm not attracted to any of them" and the girls come out the winner.
I was thinking the same thing. 6-8th grade boys are shorter than the girls, have not hit the throws of puberty, stink and generally look like little boys. As where half the girls look like grown women. I can see why they aren’t attracted to the boys as assume their are bi since their girl friends are appealing
Right but this has already been true.
Right, but the default used to just be, the boys are still gross. Now it is, go I'm probably be bi/gay
+1 Or asexual, which just gets me. I am all for some asexual 13 year olds!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do all you parents care so much? Being a closeted person with no internet in the 80’s was HELL.
At least these kids can express themselves and talk to other ppl that might be like them. Social media can be harmful but it can also be helpful.
I don’t care about labels and my kids or their friends can change their labels and pronouns daily for all I care. As long as they are having and kind. The End
Get a life ppl
I care because my kid and her friends care a lot. I don’t get involved but I like to be at least aware of what my kids are talking about and into, and I especially recommend that all parents of teens know who their kids are talking to online. The harmful/helpful line in social media is really, really fine when it comes to kids being influenced by strangers on the internet.
If your kids are influenced by strangers on the internet, that is a parenting issue
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do all you parents care so much? Being a closeted person with no internet in the 80’s was HELL.
At least these kids can express themselves and talk to other ppl that might be like them. Social media can be harmful but it can also be helpful.
I don’t care about labels and my kids or their friends can change their labels and pronouns daily for all I care. As long as they are having and kind. The End
Get a life ppl
I care because my kid and her friends care a lot. I don’t get involved but I like to be at least aware of what my kids are talking about and into, and I especially recommend that all parents of teens know who their kids are talking to online. The harmful/helpful line in social media is really, really fine when it comes to kids being influenced by strangers on the internet.