Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A thought for the gang of 37 or anyone that feels that Optimum Construction or Omar Elrahimy wrongfully took or kept your money. Check your homeowner's policy to see if you have coverage for theft. It may not cover it all or any but is worth checking into, especially now that St of MD has filed charges of felony theft against Omar Elrahimy. Of course, these are just charges, he is innocent until proven guilty, we have not heard his explanation and that is what our legal system will provide him. However, the State of MD, presumably MHIC has looked into both sides of these complaints and feels there is enough to let our court system decide. All of this to say that your insurance might have to take a hard look at things if you had coverage for theft. Just an opinion and speculating in hopes it might help someone. No intent of harm to anyone. Good luck.
In general most things that would have helped mitigate damage like purchasing bonds or umbrella coverages would have been purchased before signing the contract so pretty much the lesson learnt was do not trust Amr Elrahimy or any companies associated with him. This whole process has been such a disappointment in both the protection for the victims and how slow the system is. I just hope people read these comments in the future and if they decide to work with Amr Elrahimy that they protect themselves.
Who purchases the bonds and gets umbrella coverage - the home owner or the contractor?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A thought for the gang of 37 or anyone that feels that Optimum Construction or Omar Elrahimy wrongfully took or kept your money. Check your homeowner's policy to see if you have coverage for theft. It may not cover it all or any but is worth checking into, especially now that St of MD has filed charges of felony theft against Omar Elrahimy. Of course, these are just charges, he is innocent until proven guilty, we have not heard his explanation and that is what our legal system will provide him. However, the State of MD, presumably MHIC has looked into both sides of these complaints and feels there is enough to let our court system decide. All of this to say that your insurance might have to take a hard look at things if you had coverage for theft. Just an opinion and speculating in hopes it might help someone. No intent of harm to anyone. Good luck.
In general most things that would have helped mitigate damage like purchasing bonds or umbrella coverages would have been purchased before signing the contract so pretty much the lesson learnt was do not trust Amr Elrahimy or any companies associated with him. This whole process has been such a disappointment in both the protection for the victims and how slow the system is. I just hope people read these comments in the future and if they decide to work with Amr Elrahimy that they protect themselves.
Anonymous wrote:A thought for the gang of 37 or anyone that feels that Optimum Construction or Omar Elrahimy wrongfully took or kept your money. Check your homeowner's policy to see if you have coverage for theft. It may not cover it all or any but is worth checking into, especially now that St of MD has filed charges of felony theft against Omar Elrahimy. Of course, these are just charges, he is innocent until proven guilty, we have not heard his explanation and that is what our legal system will provide him. However, the State of MD, presumably MHIC has looked into both sides of these complaints and feels there is enough to let our court system decide. All of this to say that your insurance might have to take a hard look at things if you had coverage for theft. Just an opinion and speculating in hopes it might help someone. No intent of harm to anyone. Good luck.
Anonymous wrote:Look up Amir Elrahimy in the maryland judiciary case search:
D06CR23001723
D06CR23001861
D06CR23001862
jsteele wrote:I have just received a letter from the law office of Rollins, Smalkin, Richards, and Mackie threatening all sorts of legal repercussions if I don't remove this thread. At this time, I will not remove this thread.
As many of you have noticed, I have removed many posts from this thread. Those posts were reported to me via the "report" button that is present on every post. I believed the posts that I removed to be off-topic, in most cases mentioning individuals who are not directly involved in the subject of this thread.
The lawyer who has been in touch feels that there are many remaining posts that are defamatory. I have informed the lawyer that I will not remove the thread. However, I will comply with any legally-issued subpoenas for IP addresses.
If you are the author of a post in this thread and do not wish to have your IP address potentially turned over, you are welcome to "report" your own post and ask for it to be removed. However, that report will have to come from the same IP address as the post that you are reporting. That's the only way that I can know that it is you making the request.
In addition, the original poster of the thread can request to have the entire thread removed. However, the same stipulation will apply. I will need to be sure that such a request is actually coming from the original poster.