Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t get why the other person wouldn’t have reached out to op to discuss this before accusing op of racism.
Ridiculous leap to make without giving anyone a modicum of benefit of doubt
It’s not her job to do that. The university hired OP and the university is responsible for the quality of the people they hire for marketing. The researcher did the right thing reporting the piece to the bigger university since she has no way to know how many other people OP has let be pushed out of articles about their own work for the crime of having a soft voice or a loud colleague.
This is a leap. And to tie it to racism?
It is your job not to assume racism before you accuse someone of something life altering.
To go from ‘you didn’t represent my voice in your article enough’ to you’re a racist is insane leap. That’s some powerful cancelling right there. Like sure you could assume the absolute worst of someone but she could also call her and be like - can you adjust your story I have more to say.
Insane next level bs
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t get why the other person wouldn’t have reached out to op to discuss this before accusing op of racism.
Ridiculous leap to make without giving anyone a modicum of benefit of doubt
It’s not her job to do that. The university hired OP and the university is responsible for the quality of the people they hire for marketing. The researcher did the right thing reporting the piece to the bigger university since she has no way to know how many other people OP has let be pushed out of articles about their own work for the crime of having a soft voice or a loud colleague.
This is a leap. And to tie it to racism?
It is your job not to assume racism before you accuse someone of something life altering.
To go from ‘you didn’t represent my voice in your article enough’ to you’re a racist is insane leap. That’s some powerful cancelling right there. Like sure you could assume the absolute worst of someone but she could also call her and be like - can you adjust your story I have more to say.
Insane next level bs
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t get why the other person wouldn’t have reached out to op to discuss this before accusing op of racism.
Ridiculous leap to make without giving anyone a modicum of benefit of doubt
It’s not her job to do that. The university hired OP and the university is responsible for the quality of the people they hire for marketing. The researcher did the right thing reporting the piece to the bigger university since she has no way to know how many other people OP has let be pushed out of articles about their own work for the crime of having a soft voice or a loud colleague.
This is a leap. And to tie it to racism?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t get why the other person wouldn’t have reached out to op to discuss this before accusing op of racism.
Ridiculous leap to make without giving anyone a modicum of benefit of doubt
It’s not her job to do that. The university hired OP and the university is responsible for the quality of the people they hire for marketing. The researcher did the right thing reporting the piece to the bigger university since she has no way to know how many other people OP has let be pushed out of articles about their own work for the crime of having a soft voice or a loud colleague.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t get why the other person wouldn’t have reached out to op to discuss this before accusing op of racism.
Ridiculous leap to make without giving anyone a modicum of benefit of doubt
Anonymous wrote:My read on this is that OP is working on autopilot. She doesn’t adequately prepare for her interviews/meetings because she feels like she doesn’t need to after 20 years of doing this as a business owner. She was unprepared for the interview and relied on who spoke the most during the interview and didn’t moderate the discussion well when there was one person who was not as vocal as the other person. She may have even been annoyed at the soft spoken person, because she was so soft spoken or inarticulate, especially when they spoke over each other, causing OP to make her strange double negative statement.
When OP was writing her piece, she worked with what she had and saw that she had more material from the loud man. Instead of reaching back out to the Asian woman, she smugly said to herself, “Well, this is what I have and I’m going with it. She should have spoken up more if she wanted more quotes in the piece.”
After seeing the piece, the lead author and the university came back to OP and called her out on the lop-sidedness of the piece. However, instead of criticizing her interviewing and writing skills, they mistakenly blamed the poor execution on racism. OP knows she could have done a better job with the piece if she had taken extra steps to include more from the lead author and feels embarrassed about the poor quality of the work, but also feels unjustly accused of racism. OP doesn’t understand that she may have biases that resulted in the way she handled the interview and writing because “some of her best friends are Asian.” Instead of owning up to the poor work product, she cried and now wants to figure out how to clear her name of the racism accusation. She still doesn’t understand that maybe she’s not as good at her job as she thought she was.
Anonymous wrote:The very broad strokes: I run my own marketing agency (not in DC, but I used to live here and still keep up on the boards).
I've been doing it for 20 years and have a really great reputation that I worked hard to earn. One of my clients is a university who wanted to publicize a research paper by two academics, so I put together a release after interviewing both authors, with the rep from the uni's comm department also on the line. I record all my calls, and this was recorded.
One of the authors, apparently the lead author -- which I didn't know, they were presented to me as co-authors -- was very young, Asian American woman who spoke more softly. The co-author was an older, very articulate white male.
At some point during the call, they began to talk over one another. I said, according to my recorded transcript: "Could one of you talk? I don't want to not hear you."
The call continued on, the story was finalized, but I quoted the man, who talked more, more in the release because he had more quotable phrases.
My longtime colleague who hired me from the uni called me yesterday and was very upset -- not at me, but at the situation, trying to figure out what happened, and said this wouldn't affect *my* relationship with the uni or future work, but that I should know that the younger woman apparently reached out to accuse me of racial bias because she thought I said, quote: "I don't want to hear you."
Now, that is not what I said, and the recording bears that out. I shared the recording with him as well as our correspondence where I gave equal attention and respect to both people.
The one thing I did was quote the man more, but the man was frankly the superior interview. It was not a racial choice. In fact, I had asked the softer woman to speak up to get her to talk more!
I burst into tears with my long time colleague. I have never had this happen before. I know people can be accused of micro aggressions in work environments all the time, but it has not happened to me, and it does not feel good, and I feel mortified. I also worry about my own reputation (although my colleague seems to have my back, and my recording bears out my side.)
DCUM, how would you handle? Do I ask to speak to these people directly? Do I let my client handle it? Will it blow over? I have been up sick, crying upset about this. I work with clients in the religious, disabilities, etc space. I feel mortified that I came off this way. Help? Thank you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The very broad strokes: I run my own marketing agency (not in DC, but I used to live here and still keep up on the boards).
I've been doing it for 20 years and have a really great reputation that I worked hard to earn. One of my clients is a university who wanted to publicize a research paper by two academics, so I put together a release after interviewing both authors, with the rep from the uni's comm department also on the line. I record all my calls, and this was recorded.
One of the authors, apparently the lead author -- which I didn't know, they were presented to me as co-authors -- was very young, Asian American woman who spoke more softly. The co-author was an older, very articulate white male.
At some point during the call, they began to talk over one another. I said, according to my recorded transcript: "Could one of you talk? I don't want to not hear you."
The call continued on, the story was finalized, but I quoted the man, who talked more, more in the release because he had more quotable phrases.
My longtime colleague who hired me from the uni called me yesterday and was very upset -- not at me, but at the situation, trying to figure out what happened, and said this wouldn't affect *my* relationship with the uni or future work, but that I should know that the younger woman apparently reached out to accuse me of racial bias because she thought I said, quote: "I don't want to hear you."
Now, that is not what I said, and the recording bears that out. I shared the recording with him as well as our correspondence where I gave equal attention and respect to both people.
The one thing I did was quote the man more, but the man was frankly the superior interview. It was not a racial choice. In fact, I had asked the softer woman to speak up to get her to talk more!
I burst into tears with my long time colleague. I have never had this happen before. I know people can be accused of micro aggressions in work environments all the time, but it has not happened to me, and it does not feel good, and I feel mortified. I also worry about my own reputation (although my colleague seems to have my back, and my recording bears out my side.)
DCUM, how would you handle? Do I ask to speak to these people directly? Do I let my client handle it? Will it blow over? I have been up sick, crying upset about this. I work with clients in the religious, disabilities, etc space. I feel mortified that I came off this way. Help? Thank you.
If you are going to continue doing academic work, you should know that the lead author is most important and therefore deserves most of the quotes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The very broad strokes: I run my own marketing agency (not in DC, but I used to live here and still keep up on the boards).
I've been doing it for 20 years and have a really great reputation that I worked hard to earn. One of my clients is a university who wanted to publicize a research paper by two academics, so I put together a release after interviewing both authors, with the rep from the uni's comm department also on the line. I record all my calls, and this was recorded.
One of the authors, apparently the lead author -- which I didn't know, they were presented to me as co-authors -- was very young, Asian American woman who spoke more softly. The co-author was an older, very articulate white male.
At some point during the call, they began to talk over one another. I said, according to my recorded transcript: "Could one of you talk? I don't want to not hear you."
The call continued on, the story was finalized, but I quoted the man, who talked more, more in the release because he had more quotable phrases.
My longtime colleague who hired me from the uni called me yesterday and was very upset -- not at me, but at the situation, trying to figure out what happened, and said this wouldn't affect *my* relationship with the uni or future work, but that I should know that the younger woman apparently reached out to accuse me of racial bias because she thought I said, quote: "I don't want to hear you."
Now, that is not what I said, and the recording bears that out. I shared the recording with him as well as our correspondence where I gave equal attention and respect to both people.
The one thing I did was quote the man more, but the man was frankly the superior interview. It was not a racial choice. In fact, I had asked the softer woman to speak up to get her to talk more!
I burst into tears with my long time colleague. I have never had this happen before. I know people can be accused of micro aggressions in work environments all the time, but it has not happened to me, and it does not feel good, and I feel mortified. I also worry about my own reputation (although my colleague seems to have my back, and my recording bears out my side.)
DCUM, how would you handle? Do I ask to speak to these people directly? Do I let my client handle it? Will it blow over? I have been up sick, crying upset about this. I work with clients in the religious, disabilities, etc space. I feel mortified that I came off this way. Help? Thank you.
Your work colleague informed you of a situation in which you may have caused an offense and your reaction is to burst into tears while denying any wrongdoing.
Classic. Been seeing this since grade school.
-WOC
+1 I agree.