Anonymous wrote:Isn't cancelling people the equivalent of book burning?

That said, freedom of religion is not compatible with the streams of Islam that believe others must submit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain why OTHER people (people that are not muslim) aren't allowed to look at, print, draw, show, etc a picture that Muslims find offensive? Do muslims believe that everyone everywhere should abide by their beliefs? I'm not clear on this at all.

Forced birth Christian-identified people want to force everyone else to abide by their beliefs. It’s not like it’s a habit exclusive to Muslims.

Christians are not forced birth. No Christian is forcing any man to have sex with a woman, No Christians force any woman to become pregnant. That is the natural outcome for sexual relations. What some Christians are is called pro-life. If a life is created, and that is exactly how life is created, some Christians believe that life should not be killed.

Abortion statistics clearly show the vast majority of abortions are done because the pregnancy is inconvenient for the parents.

Among the structured survey respondents, the two most common reasons were "having a baby would dramatically change my life" and "I can't afford a baby now" (cited by 74% and 73%, respectively.

https://www.guttmacher.org/journals/psrh/2005/reasons-us-women-have-abortions-quantitative-and-qualitative-perspectives

[img][img]

Women who have abortions because they were raped is at 1%. Women who have abortions because they were victims of incest is less than half of 1%.

You can try to manipulate words, but your word manipulation is false, misleading, and factually incorrect.

Evidence for claim
“Women who have abortions because they were raped is at 1%. Women who have abortions because they were victims of incest is less than half of 1%. “

I don’t believe that at all.

I am a Christian and support Abortion rights as the lesser of many different evils related to wide spread violence and oppression against women. No woman or teen wants to get an abortion. But sometimes it is the most life affirming alternative m.

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain why OTHER people (people that are not muslim) aren't allowed to look at, print, draw, show, etc a picture that Muslims find offensive? Do muslims believe that everyone everywhere should abide by their beliefs? I'm not clear on this at all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Unfortunately, this opinion is out of step with modern political thought. Offensive speech is still protected speech in the US. If you lower the bar to offensive speech, you open the door to political suppression. I mentioned it earlier, but it was deleted, but Christians have to tolerate the Piss Christ for the same reasons that Muslims need to tolerate images of Mohammed.

Could not agree with the bolded more.

The reality is that some institutes of higher education have policies that essentially require action based on any complaint of discrimination or allegation of personal harm without regard for the circumstances or context.

It can be argued, and has been argued, that the First Amendment only protects offensive speech. It's unnecessary to protect inoffensive speech because no one would object to it.

https://www.aclu.org/news/free-speech/protecting-outrageous-offensive-speech

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain why OTHER people (people that are not muslim) aren't allowed to look at, print, draw, show, etc a picture that Muslims find offensive? Do muslims believe that everyone everywhere should abide by their beliefs? I'm not clear on this at all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am shock that we all can't agree that all Americans should be subject to Islamic blasphemy laws. This professor should be prosecuted for a hate crime.

Is this sarcasm?

Anonymous wrote:I am shock that we all can't agree that all Americans should be subject to Islamic blasphemy laws. This professor should be prosecuted for a hate crime.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like everyone tempted to show a picture of Mohammad knows they're being inflammatory. For them, this is a bug rather than a feature. I don't believe there is an ignorance crisis.

The crisis is one of jerkiness. Whether or not you agree it should be offensive, understand that it is. Only jerks deliberately offend in this way.

Is violent retaliation appropriate? I think not, but we all need to understand that the action can be understood as deeply offensive and just not do it in the first place.

Signed, traditional Jew who thinks a lot of ultra-secular and progressive faith Americans and Europeans have a bizarre blind spot when it comes to respecting the traditions of groups that have traditions.

It was an art history class! The professor repeatedly warned the students that there would be an image of Mohammed; why does the intersection of history, art, and religion need to be inflammatory?

People that are religious need to understand that the world should not revolve around their fairy tale beliefs and outdated traditions. It's a-OK to have these beliefs but it's stupid to expect others to adhere to them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain why OTHER people (people that are not muslim) aren't allowed to look at, print, draw, show, etc a picture that Muslims find offensive? Do muslims believe that everyone everywhere should abide by their beliefs? I'm not clear on this at all.

Forced birth Christian-identified people want to force everyone else to abide by their beliefs. It’s not like it’s a habit exclusive to Muslims.

Christians are not forced birth. No Christian is forcing any man to have sex with a woman, No Christians force any woman to become pregnant. That is the natural outcome for sexual relations. What some Christians are is called pro-life. If a life is created, and that is exactly how life is created, some Christians believe that life should not be killed.

Abortion statistics clearly show the vast majority of abortions are done because the pregnancy is inconvenient for the parents.

Among the structured survey respondents, the two most common reasons were "having a baby would dramatically change my life" and "I can't afford a baby now" (cited by 74% and 73%, respectively.

https://www.guttmacher.org/journals/psrh/2005/reasons-us-women-have-abortions-quantitative-and-qualitative-perspectives

[img][img]

Women who have abortions because they were raped is at 1%. Women who have abortions because they were victims of incest is less than half of 1%.

You can try to manipulate words, but your word manipulation is false, misleading, and factually incorrect.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain why OTHER people (people that are not muslim) aren't allowed to look at, print, draw, show, etc a picture that Muslims find offensive? Do muslims believe that everyone everywhere should abide by their beliefs? I'm not clear on this at all.

Forced birth Christian-identified people want to force everyone else to abide by their beliefs. It’s not like it’s a habit exclusive to Muslims.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain why OTHER people (people that are not muslim) aren't allowed to look at, print, draw, show, etc a picture that Muslims find offensive? Do muslims believe that everyone everywhere should abide by their beliefs? I'm not clear on this at all.

Forced birth Christian-identified people want to force everyone else to abide by their beliefs. It’s not like it’s a habit exclusive to Muslims.

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain why OTHER people (people that are not muslim) aren't allowed to look at, print, draw, show, etc a picture that Muslims find offensive? Do muslims believe that everyone everywhere should abide by their beliefs? I'm not clear on this at all.