Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:5:0
7:1
My observation is that some people go to the emergency room for everything. We have some friends whose kids (ages 5 and 3) have each been to the emergency room at least 8 times. These kids don't have chronic health issues or underlying conditions. They just think that a fever that lasts more than a day or two or a cough that persists more than a week deserves an emergency room visit. To me, that's a "call the nurse hotline, or worst case go to urgent care" situation. Usually we contact the nurse hotline through our pediatrician and get some good advice for treatment plus reassurance about what actually requires an ER visit, and it's fine.
My feeling is that the ER should be for: unexplained lethargy, trouble breathing (always), sudden injury (anything that makes you worry about a concussion or broken bone), or the weird kid incidents like an item lodged in an ear or nose, assuming you can't get into a pediatrician which these days you can't.
We don't go to the ER for cold symptoms, even bad ones, and we don't even go for flu/RSV type illness unless something escalates (like breathing issues). Most of the time, I think kids are best served by staying home, resting, and being cared for by a family member, not sitting in a hospital all night.
Same. My mom's group is notorious for this. "Oh no- I think my 4 year old might have RSV- time to head to ER!" It is such a waste of ER resources. I just don't get what people think the ER is going to do for their child *unless the child has breathing problems or it's life threatening*. I wish the ER could triage people like this to an urgent care instead.
PP here and thank you for validating. I was actually feeling really judgmental about my comment because I am judging my friends for how often they go. But yes, this is why it bothers me -- they are using up resources that really should be reserved for actual life threatening emergencies just because they are overzealous about health issues with their kids. To me it feels entitled, like "Well of course MY child should be seen immediately and receive ER care for whatever we want." I feel like some of this when you are a first time parent and are unsure where the line is makes some sense, but when experienced parents with multiple kids are heading to the ER "just in case" I get annoyed. ERs are constantly overcrowded and this is why. It's time to learn some basics about what symptoms require emergency care, and also to do some research on alternative options like urgent care or nurse hotlines.
I took my 3 yo to the ER in the middle of the night this summer because he spiked a high fever (103+) and was complaining that his neck hurt. I talked to the on call doctor at our pediatrician’s office who advised he be seen in the ER and not wait until morning when doctor office opened. We got to children’s ER (closest to home for us) around 1am and were advised it would be a 10 hour wait. We chose not to wait, instead went home, got some more sleep, not greet sleep, but sleep, and saw the pediatrician in the morning when the office opened - all within the 10 hour wait time for the ER. I will say that I sort of thought the ER wasn’t necessary, I wasn’t alarmed by DS’s behavior, which I told the on call doctor. But I also am not comfortable disregarding dr advice to go to the ER.
That said, that same child had an episode of respiratory distress that precipitated and asthma diagnosis in the middle of the night on the weekend this fall, we did not call the doctor or go to the ER, but waited for urgent care to open. I remember thinking that if I called the doctor they’d send us to ER and we wouldn’t be seen any faster there than waiting for urgent care to open.