Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: "I’ve seen a sworn affidavit from Yoel Roth, the former head of Twitter’s trust and safety. He was meeting every week before the election with FBI and other intelligence officials." -

Miranda Devine on @FoxNews

That IS a violation of the 1st

No it isn’t.

Yes it is The FIB and government intelligence officials are (wait for it) government agencies.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: "I’ve seen a sworn affidavit from Yoel Roth, the former head of Twitter’s trust and safety. He was meeting every week before the election with FBI and other intelligence officials." -

Miranda Devine on @FoxNews

That IS a violation of the 1st

No it isn’t.

Anonymous wrote: "I’ve seen a sworn affidavit from Yoel Roth, the former head of Twitter’s trust and safety. He was meeting every week before the election with FBI and other intelligence officials." -

Miranda Devine on @FoxNews

That IS a violation of the 1st

Anonymous wrote:Crazy conservatives push fake story and no one believes them.

Next old man yells at clouds.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:They do no such thing. It is one of the biggest nothingburgers in recent history. Please, in specific detail, list anything that was illegal or even unethical that was revealed.

For example, the White House Press Secretary had her account frozen for tweeting about a New York Post article about Hunters laptop in the month before the 2020 election. I would say that was an abuse of power and an unethical decision by twitter.

Well it was a a totally fake story made up by Rudy.

Then why the claim it was 'hacked'?

The biggest problem with the laptop is lack of any reliable chain of custody. Seems to me many people had access to it, to be making all kinds of wild claims about what was or wasn't on it (including Rudy Giuliani at one point claiming there was child porn on it). While I don't doubt there are real files and emails on the laptop, other things could easily have been planted or altered and it's a known tactic of GRU and others to plant damning forgeries in the midst of real content.

And, at the exact same time that the laptop story surfaced, a bunch of other things flew around and raised huge red flags, for example some emails that showed signs of being forgeries, some emails that were curiously image files rather than being actual emails or pdf's of emails. Add to it the super-sketchy "corroboration" that came from "Biden business partner Tony Bobulinski" who had a history of fraud and a $600k judgement against him that mysteriously got paid off as he resurfaced, along with his "evidence" being photos (!) of iphone screen shots (!) of messages allegedly with Biden, which were being displayed on a Blackberry with a cracked screen that was connected to a RUSSIAN cellular network (!!!!) https://twitter.com/JeetoCheesus/status/1319407511821312006 It all ended up looking like a crude attempt at salting the mine.

So what you are saying is that the Bobulinsky emails could have been falsified, meaning that the copies Bobulinsky had on his own computer with email addresses/receipts, etc were falsified too, even though it never left his own custody?

Fox and WSJ investigated Bobulinski’s emails and concluded there was no business deal and no money. It was bullshit.

Incorrect

https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/oct/29/tony-bobulinski-hunter-biden-and-china-explainer/

The Wall Street Journal reported that the deal fell through; SinoHawk never received money from or completed deals with the Chinese oil company. According to the newspaper, Hunter, Joe Biden’s brother James, Gilliar and Walker were also involved — but there was no role for Joe Biden.

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:They do no such thing. It is one of the biggest nothingburgers in recent history. Please, in specific detail, list anything that was illegal or even unethical that was revealed.

For example, the White House Press Secretary had her account frozen for tweeting about a New York Post article about Hunters laptop in the month before the 2020 election. I would say that was an abuse of power and an unethical decision by twitter.

Twitter made a decision that the laptop story violated its terms of service. The White House Press Secretary violated the terms of service and had her account frozen until she removed the tweet in question. That is not unethical. To the contrary, it would have been unethical to allow the Press Secretary to violate terms of service to which others were held to account.

But why did the media decide to suppress the laptop story? Did the Biden campaign request they suppress it? Did the media/twitter want Biden to win and suppress/manipulate the facts? Is that OK?

Even Taibbi didn’t find evidence that the Biden campaign was involved in the laptop story decision.

They didn't find John Podesta was involved in the "Russia Dossier" until he admitted in deposition under oath
that the DNC and the Clinton campaign each paid 50 percent of the cost to purchase it.

BTW, not everything is in writing. That's why you investigate and perform discovery.

Do you really believe what you've seen so far is the totality of what went on?

Discovery? You seem confused and are acting like what was released was somehow under adversarial circumstances. That is not the case. Elon Musk has control of all of Twitter's internal correspondence and that's what he handed over to Taibbi.

Maybe he can use neuralink to hack Biden’s brain too.

Maybe the Biden admin FCC should fine Twitter for wrongdoing over suppressing the Biden laptop story and helping Biden get elected. Sounds about right. Companies need to be held accountable.

Accountable for what? What law or regulation did Twitter break?

Let's see if their suppression and selective dissemination of information at Democrat request, is considered to be election interference.

But there was suppression by the request of the Trump White House as well. Is that also election interference?

Also, what is illegal with a private company selectively publishing information? Do you deny that Fox News or any other media outlet is selective? If not, where is my prime time show on Fox? Why is Fox interfering with elections by not broadcasting my opinions?

If they are selectively publishing then they are not a platform, and lose Sec 230 protection.

It appears lower level employees banned the laptop story and links to NY Post to protect Biden, coming up with an excuse of hacking, and after they realized this was bogus, no one was willing to undo the decision, again because they wanted to protect Biden.
The Democrats in the FBI knew the laptop story was likely to come out, and preemptively went to tech companies and told them Russian disinformation was likely to come out.

You are wrong about Section 230. If you were correct, nobody could moderate anything. Platforms absolutely have the right to enforce their terms of service.

You have no way of knowing the motivations of the Twitter employees beyond what is mentioned in their emails saying that they viewed the Post story as violating their TOS regarding hacking. You are simply making things up.

Please take the time to educate yourself about the import and parameters of Section 230.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/12/publisher-or-platform-it-doesnt-matter

Anonymous wrote:Dick pics REPUBLCIANS FACINATION WITH GENITALS IS UNPARRELLED.

Ted Cruz is going to have to explain why a sitting senator posted porn on twitter.

UNPRECEDENTED FRAUD: Donald Trump overvaluing his properties by as much as 3300% to get loans and avoid taxes.

UNPRECEDENTED CURE: The NY AG is seeking to cancel the corporate charters of Trump’s businesses — and get at least $250 million in restitution and penalties.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:They do no such thing. It is one of the biggest nothingburgers in recent history. Please, in specific detail, list anything that was illegal or even unethical that was revealed.

For example, the White House Press Secretary had her account frozen for tweeting about a New York Post article about Hunters laptop in the month before the 2020 election. I would say that was an abuse of power and an unethical decision by twitter.

Well it was a a totally fake story made up by Rudy.

Then why the claim it was 'hacked'?

The biggest problem with the laptop is lack of any reliable chain of custody. Seems to me many people had access to it, to be making all kinds of wild claims about what was or wasn't on it (including Rudy Giuliani at one point claiming there was child porn on it). While I don't doubt there are real files and emails on the laptop, other things could easily have been planted or altered and it's a known tactic of GRU and others to plant damning forgeries in the midst of real content.

And, at the exact same time that the laptop story surfaced, a bunch of other things flew around and raised huge red flags, for example some emails that showed signs of being forgeries, some emails that were curiously image files rather than being actual emails or pdf's of emails. Add to it the super-sketchy "corroboration" that came from "Biden business partner Tony Bobulinski" who had a history of fraud and a $600k judgement against him that mysteriously got paid off as he resurfaced, along with his "evidence" being photos (!) of iphone screen shots (!) of messages allegedly with Biden, which were being displayed on a Blackberry with a cracked screen that was connected to a RUSSIAN cellular network (!!!!) https://twitter.com/JeetoCheesus/status/1319407511821312006 It all ended up looking like a crude attempt at salting the mine.

So what you are saying is that the Bobulinsky emails could have been falsified, meaning that the copies Bobulinsky had on his own computer with email addresses/receipts, etc were falsified too, even though it never left his own custody?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:They do no such thing. It is one of the biggest nothingburgers in recent history. Please, in specific detail, list anything that was illegal or even unethical that was revealed.

For example, the White House Press Secretary had her account frozen for tweeting about a New York Post article about Hunters laptop in the month before the 2020 election. I would say that was an abuse of power and an unethical decision by twitter.

Well it was a a totally fake story made up by Rudy.

Then why the claim it was 'hacked'?

The biggest problem with the laptop is lack of any reliable chain of custody. Seems to me many people had access to it, to be making all kinds of wild claims about what was or wasn't on it (including Rudy Giuliani at one point claiming there was child porn on it). While I don't doubt there are real files and emails on the laptop, other things could easily have been planted or altered and it's a known tactic of GRU and others to plant damning forgeries in the midst of real content.

And, at the exact same time that the laptop story surfaced, a bunch of other things flew around and raised huge red flags, for example some emails that showed signs of being forgeries, some emails that were curiously image files rather than being actual emails or pdf's of emails. Add to it the super-sketchy "corroboration" that came from "Biden business partner Tony Bobulinski" who had a history of fraud and a $600k judgement against him that mysteriously got paid off as he resurfaced, along with his "evidence" being photos (!) of iphone screen shots (!) of messages allegedly with Biden, which were being displayed on a Blackberry with a cracked screen that was connected to a RUSSIAN cellular network (!!!!) https://twitter.com/JeetoCheesus/status/1319407511821312006 It all ended up looking like a crude attempt at salting the mine.

Your source is JeetoCheesus?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:They do no such thing. It is one of the biggest nothingburgers in recent history. Please, in specific detail, list anything that was illegal or even unethical that was revealed.

For example, the White House Press Secretary had her account frozen for tweeting about a New York Post article about Hunters laptop in the month before the 2020 election. I would say that was an abuse of power and an unethical decision by twitter.

Well it was a a totally fake story made up by Rudy.

Then why the claim it was 'hacked'?

The biggest problem with the laptop is lack of any reliable chain of custody. Seems to me many people had access to it, to be making all kinds of wild claims about what was or wasn't on it (including Rudy Giuliani at one point claiming there was child porn on it). While I don't doubt there are real files and emails on the laptop, other things could easily have been planted or altered and it's a known tactic of GRU and others to plant damning forgeries in the midst of real content.

And, at the exact same time that the laptop story surfaced, a bunch of other things flew around and raised huge red flags, for example some emails that showed signs of being forgeries, some emails that were curiously image files rather than being actual emails or pdf's of emails. Add to it the super-sketchy "corroboration" that came from "Biden business partner Tony Bobulinski" who had a history of fraud and a $600k judgement against him that mysteriously got paid off as he resurfaced, along with his "evidence" being photos (!) of iphone screen shots (!) of messages allegedly with Biden, which were being displayed on a Blackberry with a cracked screen that was connected to a RUSSIAN cellular network (!!!!) https://twitter.com/JeetoCheesus/status/1319407511821312006 It all ended up looking like a crude attempt at salting the mine.

So what you are saying is that the Bobulinsky emails could have been falsified, meaning that the copies Bobulinsky had on his own computer with email addresses/receipts, etc were falsified too, even though it never left his own custody?

Fox and WSJ investigated Bobulinski’s emails and concluded there was no business deal and no money. It was bullshit.

Incorrect

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:They do no such thing. It is one of the biggest nothingburgers in recent history. Please, in specific detail, list anything that was illegal or even unethical that was revealed.

For example, the White House Press Secretary had her account frozen for tweeting about a New York Post article about Hunters laptop in the month before the 2020 election. I would say that was an abuse of power and an unethical decision by twitter.

Well it was a a totally fake story made up by Rudy.

Then why the claim it was 'hacked'?

The biggest problem with the laptop is lack of any reliable chain of custody. Seems to me many people had access to it, to be making all kinds of wild claims about what was or wasn't on it (including Rudy Giuliani at one point claiming there was child porn on it). While I don't doubt there are real files and emails on the laptop, other things could easily have been planted or altered and it's a known tactic of GRU and others to plant damning forgeries in the midst of real content.

And, at the exact same time that the laptop story surfaced, a bunch of other things flew around and raised huge red flags, for example some emails that showed signs of being forgeries, some emails that were curiously image files rather than being actual emails or pdf's of emails. Add to it the super-sketchy "corroboration" that came from "Biden business partner Tony Bobulinski" who had a history of fraud and a $600k judgement against him that mysteriously got paid off as he resurfaced, along with his "evidence" being photos (!) of iphone screen shots (!) of messages allegedly with Biden, which were being displayed on a Blackberry with a cracked screen that was connected to a RUSSIAN cellular network (!!!!) https://twitter.com/JeetoCheesus/status/1319407511821312006 It all ended up looking like a crude attempt at salting the mine.

So what you are saying is that the Bobulinsky emails could have been falsified, meaning that the copies Bobulinsky had on his own computer with email addresses/receipts, etc were falsified too, even though it never left his own custody?

Fox and WSJ investigated Bobulinski’s emails and concluded there was no business deal and no money. It was bullshit.