Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Saying her boys would be cut off from access to her money once they are adults snd would need to work is not abuse.

Her boys have learned from their dad to live off this woman’s money without any respect for the work she did for it. Not only that, she worked for it and had no access to it herself for most of her adult life while her ex and her kids, and every other family member did.

Her ex is a loser and absolutely scum for parading his teenage sons in TV encouraging them to badmouth her. Why? So she can be shamed into a corner and give them her purse.

The kids need to learn how to adult once they are adults. She can change her mind about inheritance down the road but they are not entitled to anything.

You are crazy. Her children "live off" of her money because they are her minor children. They are not leaches. They are her minor children. What kind of sick adult are you? There is something wrong with you if this is how you refer to her children.

You need to keep up. This is about when her minor children become ADULTS.

And you are the only one using the word “leaches”.

Triggered much?

Anonymous wrote:Saying her boys would be cut off from access to her money once they are adults snd would need to work is not abuse.

Her boys have learned from their dad to live off this woman’s money without any respect for the work she did for it. Not only that, she worked for it and had no access to it herself for most of her adult life while her ex and her kids, and every other family member did.

Her ex is a loser and absolutely scum for parading his teenage sons in TV encouraging them to badmouth her. Why? So she can be shamed into a corner and give them her purse.

The kids need to learn how to adult once they are adults. She can change her mind about inheritance down the road but they are not entitled to anything.

You are crazy. Her children "live off" of her money because they are her minor children. They are not leaches. They are her minor children. What kind of sick adult are you? There is something wrong with you if this is how you refer to her children.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Saying her boys would be cut off from access to her money once they are adults snd would need to work is not abuse.

Her boys have learned from their dad to live off this woman’s money without any respect for the work she did for it. Not only that, she worked for it and had no access to it herself for most of her adult life while her ex and her kids, and every other family member did.

Her ex is a loser and absolutely scum for parading his teenage sons in TV encouraging them to badmouth her. Why? So she can be shamed into a corner and give them her purse.

The kids need to learn how to adult once they are adults. She can change her mind about inheritance down the road but they are not entitled to anything.

What a dismal dysfunctional view of families, mothers and children. How bleak.

How so?

Let me guess, you believe a Mom is only good if she’s a martyr. Having no boundaries, okay with being gaslit, disrespected, okay with only giving without any receiving.

The dad is a loser, the boys will be men taught to disrespect their mother and women in general. They need time to learn how to adult without mommy’s money and hopefully they will learn that they need to unlearn the ways of their dad to get there.

But my guess is that they’ll find some rich young woman and try to hook them and live off of them too.

Britney had free choice to date, marry and have children with Kevin.

Right so now she has to be the martyr and bankroll all of them as adults for the rest of her life. Misogynistic much?

Has there been a suggestion that Kevin or the kids expects her to bankroll the kids past 18? Let’s be real, she was not capable of anything other than being an occasional parent who was probably considered by the kids the same as the fun aunt. She had those kids so the least she could do was be financially responsible for them since she clearly wasn’t capable of being a full time parent. Britney apologists can’t have it both ways, either she was always well enough to not have a conservator, therefore she should have been a more present parent, or she has deficits which is why Kevin had essentially full custody and received the monetary support he did.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Saying her boys would be cut off from access to her money once they are adults snd would need to work is not abuse.

Her boys have learned from their dad to live off this woman’s money without any respect for the work she did for it. Not only that, she worked for it and had no access to it herself for most of her adult life while her ex and her kids, and every other family member did.

Her ex is a loser and absolutely scum for parading his teenage sons in TV encouraging them to badmouth her. Why? So she can be shamed into a corner and give them her purse.

The kids need to learn how to adult once they are adults. She can change her mind about inheritance down the road but they are not entitled to anything.

What a dismal dysfunctional view of families, mothers and children. How bleak.

How so?

Let me guess, you believe a Mom is only good if she’s a martyr. Having no boundaries, okay with being gaslit, disrespected, okay with only giving without any receiving.

The dad is a loser, the boys will be men taught to disrespect their mother and women in general. They need time to learn how to adult without mommy’s money and hopefully they will learn that they need to unlearn the ways of their dad to get there.

But my guess is that they’ll find some rich young woman and try to hook them and live off of them too.

Britney had free choice to date, marry and have children with Kevin.

Right so now she has to be the martyr and bankroll all of them as adults for the rest of her life. Misogynistic much?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I hope for Preston's and Jayden's benefits there is a college trust for them. A trust so they can buy a first house. A trust so they can be comfortable. I hope Britney isn't really cutting them off at the age of 18 and they will have to struggle for college/whatever.

It is/was up to their father to set up a college trust for the kids out of the 40k per month they got since B has no say over any of her money until recently. And now I wouldn't give them a dime more than the court ordered amount.

JFC you are stone cold. These are kids that have had no choice in their upbringing.

Wait, you want me to feel sorry for a bratty ass celebrity kids that’s gets 20k a month?

Clearly you are not a parent.

Totally. I am on a parents board for fun listening to you moan about these poor spoiled kids and how dare they be cut off at 18. Boo hoo. They could have been banking 240k per kid per year. If their dad blew all that money that’s on him not for the mom to keep providing the gravy train especially if they aren’t talking to her. Good for you if you are bankrolling your kids but that’s not typical parenting.

You’re an awful person.

DP That's all you've got?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I hope for Preston's and Jayden's benefits there is a college trust for them. A trust so they can buy a first house. A trust so they can be comfortable. I hope Britney isn't really cutting them off at the age of 18 and they will have to struggle for college/whatever.

It is/was up to their father to set up a college trust for the kids out of the 40k per month they got since B has no say over any of her money until recently. And now I wouldn't give them a dime more than the court ordered amount.

JFC you are stone cold. These are kids that have had no choice in their upbringing.

Wait, you want me to feel sorry for a bratty ass celebrity kids that’s gets 20k a month?

Clearly you are not a parent.

Totally. I am on a parents board for fun listening to you moan about these poor spoiled kids and how dare they be cut off at 18. Boo hoo. They could have been banking 240k per kid per year. If their dad blew all that money that’s on him not for the mom to keep providing the gravy train especially if they aren’t talking to her. Good for you if you are bankrolling your kids but that’s not typical parenting.

You’re an awful person.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I hope for Preston's and Jayden's benefits there is a college trust for them. A trust so they can buy a first house. A trust so they can be comfortable. I hope Britney isn't really cutting them off at the age of 18 and they will have to struggle for college/whatever.

It is/was up to their father to set up a college trust for the kids out of the 40k per month they got since B has no say over any of her money until recently. And now I wouldn't give them a dime more than the court ordered amount.

JFC you are stone cold. These are kids that have had no choice in their upbringing.

Wait, you want me to feel sorry for a bratty ass celebrity kids that’s gets 20k a month?

Clearly you are not a parent.

Totally. I am on a parents board for fun listening to you moan about these poor spoiled kids and how dare they be cut off at 18. Boo hoo. They could have been banking 240k per kid per year. If their dad blew all that money that’s on him not for the mom to keep providing the gravy train especially if they aren’t talking to her. Good for you if you are bankrolling your kids but that’s not typical parenting.

There is a reason she was placed under a conservatorship. I’m sure her father had watched the last few months and had some I told you so thoughts. Her father should never have been the decision maker given their toxic relationship, but can we stop pretending Britney doesn’t need some assistance with her life?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I hope for Preston's and Jayden's benefits there is a college trust for them. A trust so they can buy a first house. A trust so they can be comfortable. I hope Britney isn't really cutting them off at the age of 18 and they will have to struggle for college/whatever.

It is/was up to their father to set up a college trust for the kids out of the 40k per month they got since B has no say over any of her money until recently. And now I wouldn't give them a dime more than the court ordered amount.

JFC you are stone cold. These are kids that have had no choice in their upbringing.

Wait, you want me to feel sorry for a bratty ass celebrity kids that’s gets 20k a month?

Clearly you are not a parent.

What exactly did she say that supposedly attacked them?

My prediction is that K-fed and the kids are hoping for their own reality TV show.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Saying her boys would be cut off from access to her money once they are adults snd would need to work is not abuse.

Her boys have learned from their dad to live off this woman’s money without any respect for the work she did for it. Not only that, she worked for it and had no access to it herself for most of her adult life while her ex and her kids, and every other family member did.

Her ex is a loser and absolutely scum for parading his teenage sons in TV encouraging them to badmouth her. Why? So she can be shamed into a corner and give them her purse.

The kids need to learn how to adult once they are adults. She can change her mind about inheritance down the road but they are not entitled to anything.

What a dismal dysfunctional view of families, mothers and children. How bleak.

How so?

Let me guess, you believe a Mom is only good if she’s a martyr. Having no boundaries, okay with being gaslit, disrespected, okay with only giving without any receiving.

The dad is a loser, the boys will be men taught to disrespect their mother and women in general. They need time to learn how to adult without mommy’s money and hopefully they will learn that they need to unlearn the ways of their dad to get there.

But my guess is that they’ll find some rich young woman and try to hook them and live off of them too.

Britney had free choice to date, marry and have children with Kevin.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I hope for Preston's and Jayden's benefits there is a college trust for them. A trust so they can buy a first house. A trust so they can be comfortable. I hope Britney isn't really cutting them off at the age of 18 and they will have to struggle for college/whatever.

It is/was up to their father to set up a college trust for the kids out of the 40k per month they got since B has no say over any of her money until recently. And now I wouldn't give them a dime more than the court ordered amount.

JFC you are stone cold. These are kids that have had no choice in their upbringing.

Wait, you want me to feel sorry for a bratty ass celebrity kids that’s gets 20k a month?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Saying her boys would be cut off from access to her money once they are adults snd would need to work is not abuse.

Her boys have learned from their dad to live off this woman’s money without any respect for the work she did for it. Not only that, she worked for it and had no access to it herself for most of her adult life while her ex and her kids, and every other family member did.

Her ex is a loser and absolutely scum for parading his teenage sons in TV encouraging them to badmouth her. Why? So she can be shamed into a corner and give them her purse.

The kids need to learn how to adult once they are adults. She can change her mind about inheritance down the road but they are not entitled to anything.

What a dismal dysfunctional view of families, mothers and children. How bleak.

How so?

Let me guess, you believe a Mom is only good if she’s a martyr. Having no boundaries, okay with being gaslit, disrespected, okay with only giving without any receiving.

The dad is a loser, the boys will be men taught to disrespect their mother and women in general. They need time to learn how to adult without mommy’s money and hopefully they will learn that they need to unlearn the ways of their dad to get there.

But my guess is that they’ll find some rich young woman and try to hook them and live off of them too.

Anonymous wrote:It comes down to this.

I have several degrees, long time marriage and stable home. BUT, my teenage son and daughter are kicking my a$&. I am in tears some days. It so so hard to handle and manage them while keeping the family together.

And BS has mental health issues, no education , unstable life, a husband who is encouraging her to alienate her whole family. And she didn’t have custody of the kids. She just doesn’t have the tools to handle this age. The video shows it though I could see myself in some of those.

What she doesn’t get is that teenagers will be teenagers and you try to live through it and come out the other side. Going public and berating them and threatening to cut them off isn’t going to do squat at this point. Only further alienates. Anyone with teenagers knows this.

Whatever. I tell my DSs that they have three choices upon turning 18 and graduating from high school. Their choices are dorm barracks or their apartment. I am not taking care of adults. If I choose to leave them anything in my will, that's my choice. They know they are not entitled to my money as adults, for their father and I have provided for all their financial, emotional, and psychological needs. We will pay for college and the dorms Brittney has only been able to provide for their financial needs. She was prevented from providing for the other needs. If her children want to be in her life beyond the money, they need to act like it, especially the sixteen-year old. Brittney she offer to pay for the boys to go to college and if they decide they want to be a bum and try to live off her largess, she needs to cut them off.