Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LAMB is finally allowing some parents into the building. But parents have to show proof of vaccination to take a tour of the building.
Did LAMB go to voluntary masking last year?
Anonymous wrote:I have kids who have been at Inspired for many years and I've given the school the benefit of the doubt on lots and lots of decisions and have, by and large, been happy to sit back and let them do their thing.
But, after 2.5 years of pandemic, with CDC guidance where it is, and with literally every other institution relaxing their mitigation strategies, I feel like it's appropriate to give families a lot more explanation than "we are masking."
I'd like to know more so that I can explain to my kids why they are required to wear masks at school and not anywhere else. Because right now? I don't have it in me to carry the school's water on this. I am also really bummed that my kids are starting another year with (at least some) teacher attention diverted to mask compliance vs. building classroom community and teaching/learning.
Anonymous wrote:LAMB is finally allowing some parents into the building. But parents have to show proof of vaccination to take a tour of the building.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ITDS requiring masks. I am so unhappy about this. No clear path for reconsidering like some other schools. It’s just too much.
Are masks required for the meet your teacher night or for students going returning to school?
Confirmed. I just clarified with an ITDS teacher that all students are required to wear masks. We need to start a petition to at least make it optional. Or go to a different school, which sounds a million times nicer at this point.
I and every other ITDS parent I've talked to since this got announced would absolutely sign this. Do it!!
Anonymous wrote:LAMB is finally allowing some parents into the building. But parents have to show proof of vaccination to take a tour of the building.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Charters should be following DCPS.
Logically maybe, but their ability to not follow DCPS is the fundamental principle behind charters. You can’t ask for autonomy only when it suits you
Anonymous wrote:Charters should be following DCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Charters should be following DCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Inspired Teaching requiring masks in fall of 2022 is simply part of their social justice immersion curriculum. You can't turn kids into true political activists without the proper religious facewear.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am an ITDS parent and am fine with continued masking. Can’t wait to hear more entitled parents complain though!
What makes following the CDC “entitled”? Is that just a new catch-all slur now?
It’s more the endless whining and foot stomping.
I’m sorry it is whining to want to follow the CDC?
I get that the parents won’t make any difference at all on the school. People who are looking at charters should take note that parents hold zero ability to change a school, aside from perhaps trickling out over time and having the school eventually close. But since DCPS sucks so badly in most of the city, the charters will always have a foothold.
Mostly the only option is to get out of DC.
Parents don’t have much ability to change DCPS either….
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ITDS requiring masks. I am so unhappy about this. No clear path for reconsidering like some other schools. It’s just too much.
Are masks required for the meet your teacher night or for students going returning to school?
Confirmed. I just clarified with an ITDS teacher that all students are required to wear masks. We need to start a petition to at least make it optional. Or go to a different school, which sounds a million times nicer at this point.
I and every other ITDS parent I've talked to since this got announced would absolutely sign this. Do it!!