Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My training in pediatrics says averages are 50% of toddlers are trained by 36 months of age. Standard advice is not to start till after 28 months of age.
+1, fully half of all kids train after turning 3. And the percent of kids not trained by kindergarten is quite small. So those 3 year olds are successful.
It's parental preference and yes, you can absolutely do harm by training too early.
20 months isn’t too early. It’s been done for centuries. You’re just silly.
For centuries people didn't have modern plumbing or underwear. Kids ran around naked and learned to go behind a tree. People had lower standards of cleanliness and hygiene. Learning to use a modern toilet is a totally different deal and it actually makes sense that most kids take a bit longer because going to the bathroom sitting down is a weird modern convenience that we force on them, which is why doing so very early is entirely about parental preference and can cause issues. Toilet put kids in an unnatural position to eliminate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My training in pediatrics says averages are 50% of toddlers are trained by 36 months of age. Standard advice is not to start till after 28 months of age.
+1, fully half of all kids train after turning 3. And the percent of kids not trained by kindergarten is quite small. So those 3 year olds are successful.
It's parental preference and yes, you can absolutely do harm by training too early.
20 months isn’t too early. It’s been done for centuries. You’re just silly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My training in pediatrics says averages are 50% of toddlers are trained by 36 months of age. Standard advice is not to start till after 28 months of age.
+1, fully half of all kids train after turning 3. And the percent of kids not trained by kindergarten is quite small. So those 3 year olds are successful.
It's parental preference and yes, you can absolutely do harm by training too early.
20 months isn’t too early. It’s been done for centuries. You’re just silly.
Potty training a 1 year old, I don’t think so. Go back to your 1700’s where they didn’t bathe daily for centuries.
Why don’t you care about our environment? Or climate change?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My training in pediatrics says averages are 50% of toddlers are trained by 36 months of age. Standard advice is not to start till after 28 months of age.
+1, fully half of all kids train after turning 3. And the percent of kids not trained by kindergarten is quite small. So those 3 year olds are successful.
It's parental preference and yes, you can absolutely do harm by training too early.
+2, 3 is average the average age in a developed society.
Now that’s a lie.
Pp not lying. I was recently told by my pediatrician that three is on point. And a little later for boys.
There’s absolutely zero evidence to support that nonsense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My training in pediatrics says averages are 50% of toddlers are trained by 36 months of age. Standard advice is not to start till after 28 months of age.
+1, fully half of all kids train after turning 3. And the percent of kids not trained by kindergarten is quite small. So those 3 year olds are successful.
It's parental preference and yes, you can absolutely do harm by training too early.
20 months isn’t too early. It’s been done for centuries. You’re just silly.
Potty training a 1 year old, I don’t think so. Go back to your 1700’s where they didn’t bathe daily for centuries.
Why don’t you care about our environment? Or climate change?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My training in pediatrics says averages are 50% of toddlers are trained by 36 months of age. Standard advice is not to start till after 28 months of age.
+1, fully half of all kids train after turning 3. And the percent of kids not trained by kindergarten is quite small. So those 3 year olds are successful.
It's parental preference and yes, you can absolutely do harm by training too early.
+2, 3 is average the average age in a developed society.
Now that’s a lie.
Pp not lying. I was recently told by my pediatrician that three is on point. And a little later for boys.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My training in pediatrics says averages are 50% of toddlers are trained by 36 months of age. Standard advice is not to start till after 28 months of age.
+1, fully half of all kids train after turning 3. And the percent of kids not trained by kindergarten is quite small. So those 3 year olds are successful.
It's parental preference and yes, you can absolutely do harm by training too early.
20 months isn’t too early. It’s been done for centuries. You’re just silly.
Potty training a 1 year old, I don’t think so. Go back to your 1700’s where they didn’t bathe daily for centuries.
Anonymous wrote:Some posters appear to own stock in Huggies/Pampers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My training in pediatrics says averages are 50% of toddlers are trained by 36 months of age. Standard advice is not to start till after 28 months of age.
+1, fully half of all kids train after turning 3. And the percent of kids not trained by kindergarten is quite small. So those 3 year olds are successful.
It's parental preference and yes, you can absolutely do harm by training too early.
+2, 3 is average the average age in a developed society.
Now that’s a lie.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My training in pediatrics says averages are 50% of toddlers are trained by 36 months of age. Standard advice is not to start till after 28 months of age.
+1, fully half of all kids train after turning 3. And the percent of kids not trained by kindergarten is quite small. So those 3 year olds are successful.
It's parental preference and yes, you can absolutely do harm by training too early.
20 months isn’t too early. It’s been done for centuries. You’re just silly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My training in pediatrics says averages are 50% of toddlers are trained by 36 months of age. Standard advice is not to start till after 28 months of age.
+1, fully half of all kids train after turning 3. And the percent of kids not trained by kindergarten is quite small. So those 3 year olds are successful.
It's parental preference and yes, you can absolutely do harm by training too early.
+2, 3 is average the average age in a developed society.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My training in pediatrics says averages are 50% of toddlers are trained by 36 months of age. Standard advice is not to start till after 28 months of age.
+1, fully half of all kids train after turning 3. And the percent of kids not trained by kindergarten is quite small. So those 3 year olds are successful.
It's parental preference and yes, you can absolutely do harm by training too early.
20 months isn’t too early. It’s been done for centuries. You’re just silly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My training in pediatrics says averages are 50% of toddlers are trained by 36 months of age. Standard advice is not to start till after 28 months of age.
+1, fully half of all kids train after turning 3. And the percent of kids not trained by kindergarten is quite small. So those 3 year olds are successful.
It's parental preference and yes, you can absolutely do harm by training too early.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My training in pediatrics says averages are 50% of toddlers are trained by 36 months of age. Standard advice is not to start till after 28 months of age.
+1, fully half of all kids train after turning 3. And the percent of kids not trained by kindergarten is quite small. So those 3 year olds are successful.
It's parental preference and yes, you can absolutely do harm by training too early.